![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Drawing on Eccles’ expectancy-value model of achievement-related choices, we examined the personal aptitudes and motivational beliefs at 12th grade that move individuals toward or away from science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) occupations at age 29. In the first set of analyses, occupational and lifestyle values, math ability self-concepts, family demographics, and high school course-taking more strongly predicted both individual and gender differences in the likelihood of entering STEM careers than math scores on the Differential Aptitude Test. In the second set of analyses, individual and gender differences in career decisions within STEM disciplines (health, biological, and medical sciences (HBMS) versus mathematics, physical, engineering, and computer sciences (MPECS)) were best predicted by occupational values (i.e. preferences for work that were people oriented and altruistic predicted entrance into HBMS instead of MPECS careers). Females were less likely to hold the beliefs that predicted selection of STEM in general, but those who did choose STEM were more likely to select HBMS than MPECS. One Sentence Summary: Gender differences in selecting STEM related and health, biological, and medical occupations result primarily from gender differences in occupational and lifestyle values.
References
|
Abele, A. E., Spurk, D. (2011). The dual impact of gender and the influence of timing of parenthood on men’s and women’s career development: Longitudinal findings. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 225–232. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Bagnoli, A., Demey, D., Scott, J. (2014). Young people, gender, and science: Does an early interest lead to a job in SET? A longitudinal view from the BHPS youth data. In Schoon, I., Eccles, J. S. (Eds.), Gender differences in aspirations and attainment: A life course perspective (pp. 321–345). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Benbow, C. P., Lubinski, D., Shea, D. L., Eftekhari-Sanjani, H. (2000). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: Their status 10-years later. Psychological Science, 11, 474–480. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M. (2010). Sex differences in math-intensive fields. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 275–279. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Chow, A., Salmela-Aro, K. (2014). Does priority matter? Gendered patterns of subjective task values across school subject domains. In Schoon, I., Eccles, J. S. (Eds.), Gender differences in aspirations and attainment: A life course perspective (pp. 247–265). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691–1730. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Di Dio, L., Saragovi, C., Koestner, R., Aube, J. (1996). Linking personal values to gender. Sex Roles, 34, 621–637. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Diekman, A. B., Clark, E. K., Johnston, A. M., Brown, E. R., Steinberg, M. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10, 902–918. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Durik, A. M., Vida, M., Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382–393. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dweck, C. (2008). Mindsets and math/science achievement. New York: Carnagie Corporation of New York, Institute for Advance Study, Commission on Mathematics and Science Education. Google Scholar | |
|
Eccles, J. (1983). Female achievement patterns: Attributions, expectancies, values, and choice. Journal of Social Issues, 1–26. Google Scholar | |
|
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78–89. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Eccles, J. S., Harold, R. D. (1992). Gender differences in educational and occupational patterns among the gifted. In Colangelo, N., Assouline, S. G., Ambroson, D. L. (Eds.), Talent development: Proceedings from the 1991 Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development (pp. 3–29). Unionville, NY: Trillium Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Eccles, J. S., Barber, B., Jozefowicz, D. (1999). Linking gender to education, occupation, and recreational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. In Swann, W. B., Langlois, J. H., Gilbert, L. A. (Ed.), Sexism and stereotypes in modern society: The gender science of Janet Taylor Spence (pp. 153–192). Washington, DC: APA Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Ferriman, K., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. (2009). Work preferences, life values, and personal views of top math/science graduate students and the profoundly gifted: Developmental changes and gender differences during emerging adulthood and parenthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 517–532. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Hakim, C. (2006). Women, careers, and work-life preferences. British Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 34, 279–294. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–51. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Hill, C., Corbett, C., St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: AAUW. Google Scholar | |
|
Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Jacobs, J. E., Hyatt, S., Osgood, W. D., Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve. Child Development, 73, 509–527. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Jerrim, J., Schoon, I. (2014). Do teenagers want to become scientists? A comparison of gender differences in attitudes toward science, career expectations, and academic skills across 29 countries. In Schoon, I., Eccles, J. S. (Eds.), Gender differences in aspirations and attainment: A life course perspective (pp. 203–223). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Koller, O., Baumert, J., Schnabel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 448–470. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lazarides, R., Ittel, A. (2015). Gendered motivation and choice in STEM [Special Issue]. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 7(2). Retrieved from http://genderandset.open.ac.uk/index.php/genderandset Google Scholar | |
|
Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 316–345. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10-year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718–729. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Marsh, H. W. (1990). Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and English self-concepts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 107–116. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
National Science Foundation . (2011). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2011. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation. Google Scholar | |
|
Pajares, F. (2005). Gender differences in mathematics self-efficacy beliefs. In Gallagher, A. M., Kaufmann, J. C. (Eds.), Gender differences in mathematics: An integrative psychological approach (pp. 294–315). Boston: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Park, G., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science, 19, 957–961. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Parker, P., Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O. (2014). Predicting career aspirations and university majors from academic ability and self-concept: A longitudinal application of the internal–external frame of reference model. In Schoon, I., Eccles, J. S. (Eds.), Gender differences in aspirations and attainment: A life course perspective (pp. 224–246). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Quaiser-Pohl, C., Endepohls-Ulpe, M. (Eds.). (2012). Women’s choices in Europe: Influence of gender on education, occupational career and family development. Münster, Germany: Waxman. Google Scholar | |
|
Schoon, I., Eccles, J. S. (2014). Gender differences in aspirations and attainment: A life course perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Schwartz, S. H., Rubel, H. (2005). Sex differences in value priorities: Cross-cultural and multimethod studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 1010–1028. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Stoet, G., Geary, D. C. (2013). Sex differences in mathematics and reading achievement are inversely related: Within- and across-nation assessment of 10 years of PISA data. PLoS, One, 8(3): e57988. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057988. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Su, R., Rounds, J., Armstrong, P. I. (2009). Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 859–884. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Valian, V. (2007). Women at the top in science—and elsewhere. In Williams, W. M., Ceci, S. J. (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 27–39). Washington, DC: APA. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Watt, H. M. G., Eccles, J. S. (Guest Eds.) (2006). Understanding women’s choice of mathematics- and science-related careers: Longitudinal studies from four countries [Special issue]. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12(4). Google Scholar | |
|
Watt, H. M. G., Eccles, J. S. (2008). Gender and occupational outcomes: Longitudinal assessments of individual, social, and cultural influences. Washington, DC: APA Books. Google Scholar | Crossref |
