Working With Differences in Everyday Interactions through Anticipational Fluidity: A Hermeneutic Perspective

First Published April 15, 2019 Research Article

Authors

Fundação Getulio Vargas-EAESP, Sao Paulo, Brazil
by this author
,
College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, USA
by this author
First Published Online: April 15, 2019

This paper sheds light on an issue we all face, how to work with differences encountered in our everyday interactions with each other when the outcome of the exchange is not simply up to us. Our contribution lies in proposing the notion of anticipational fluidity, of finding ways of relating and responding to others as we orient ourselves to each other and to what might happen next within the moment of conversation. Situated in a hermeneutic lens that highlights the interplay of interpretations in unfolding responsive moments, we integrate the work of Shotter and Ricoeur with our interpretation of empirical texts generated from an ethnographic inquiry of academic/practitioner collaboration. We suggest that anticipational fluidity encompasses open work, difference-making and tentative intentionality, and elaborate these sensitizing resources by putting readers within unfolding moments of a meeting where differences are addressed.

Amabile, T., Patterson, C., Mueller, J., Wojcik, T., Odomirok, P., Marsh, M., Kramer, S. (2001). Academic–practitioner collaboration in management research: A case of cross-profession collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 418431.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Arvanitis, A., Karampatzos, A. (2013). Negotiation as an intersubjective process: Creating and validating claim-rights. Philosophical Psychology, 26, 89108.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Emerson, C. (Ed. & Trans.). Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Barbour, J. B., Treem, J. W., Kolar, B. (2017). Analytics and expert collaboration: How individuals navigate relationships when working with organizational data. Human Relations, 71, 256284.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Barge, K., Little, M. (2008). A discursive approach to skillful activity. Communication Theory, 18, 505534.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bartunek, J. (2007). Academic–practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 13231333.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bartunek, J. M., Louis, M. R. (1996). Insider/outsider team research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar
Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L. (2014). Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike: The paradoxes of academic–practitioner relationships. Journal of Management, 40, 11811201.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Beech, N., MacIntosh, R., MacLean, D. (2010). Dialogues between academics and practitioners: The role of generative dialogic encounters. Organization Studies, 31, 13411367.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. R. Nice (Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Brummans, B. H. J. M., Putnam, L. L., Gray, B., Hanke, R., Lewicki, R. J., Weithoff, C. (2008). Making sense of intractable multiparty conflict: A study of framing in four environmental disputes. Communications Monographs, 75, 2551.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bruns, H. C. (2013). Working alone together: Coordination in collaboration across domains of expertise. Academy of Management Journal, 56, 6283.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bucher, S. V., Chreim, S., Langley, A., Reay, T. (2016). Contestation about collaboration: Discursive boundary work among professions. Organization Studies, 37, 497522.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Clark, K., Holquist, M. (1984). Mikhail Bakhtin. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Collier, M. J., Lawless, B. (2016). Critically reflexive dialogue and praxis: Academic/practitioner reflections throughout a formative evaluation of Circles® USA. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 44, 156173.
Google Scholar
Cunliffe, A. L., Eriksen, M. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64, 14251449.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Cunliffe, A. L., Scaratti, G. (2017). Embedding impact: Developing situated knowledge through dialogical sensemaking. British Journal of Management, 28, 2944.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Daley, D. M. (2009). Interdisciplinary problems and agency boundaries: Exploring effective cross-agency collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 19, 477493.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Deetz, S., Simpson, J. (2004). Organizational dialogue: Open formation and the demand of “otherness”. In Anderson, R., Baxter, L., Cissna, K. (Eds.), Dialogic approaches to communication. (pp.141158). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Delbridge, R. (2008). Explaining conflicted collaboration: A critical realist approach to hegemony. Organization Studies, 28, 13471357.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
DiBenigno, J., Kellogg, K. C. (2014). Beyond occupational differences: The importance of cross-cutting demographics and dyadic toolkits for collaboration in a US hospital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59, 375408.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Di Domenico, M., Tracey, P., Haugh, H. (2009). The dialectic of social exchange: Theorizing corporate–social enterprise collaboration. Organization Studies, 30, 887907.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Feldman, M. S. (2010). Managing the organization of the future. Public Administration Review, 70, 159163.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Geanellos, R. (2000). Exploring Ricoeur’s hermeneutic theory of interpretation as a method of analysing research texts. Nursing Inquiry, 7, 112119.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Gergen, K., Gergen, M. M., Barrett, F. J. (2004). Dialogue: Life and death of the organization. In Grant, D., Hardy, C., Oswick, C., Phillips, N., Putnam, L. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational discourse (pp. 3960). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gertsen, M. C., Søderberg, A-M., Zølner, M. (2012). Global collaboration: Intercultural experiences and learning. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
Google Scholar
Greig, G., Gilmore, C., Patrick, H., Beech, N. (2013). Arresting moments in engaged management research. Management Learning, 44, 267285.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gulati, R., Wohlgezogen, F., Zhelyazkov, P. (2012). The two facets of collaboration: Cooperation and coordination in strategic alliances. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 531583.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hardy, C., Lawrence, T., Grant, D. (2005). Discourse and collaboration: The role of conversations and collective identity. Academy of Management Review, 30, 5877.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hernes, T., Maitlis, S. (Eds.) (2010). Process, sensemaking, and organizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hibbert, P., Huxham, C., Sydow, J., Lerch, F. (2010). Barriers to process learning: Authority and anomie in regional clusters. Management Learning, 41, 453471.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Huq, J-L., Reay, T., Chreim, S. (2016). Protecting the paradox of interprofessional collaboration. Organization Studies, 38, 513538.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Jarvenpaa, S., Majchrzak, A. (2016). Interactive self-regulatory theory for sharing and protecting in inter-organizational collaborations. Academy of Management Review, 41, 927.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jung, T., Harrow, J., Pharoah, C. (2012). Co-producing research: Working together or falling apart. Centre for Charitable Giving and Philanthropy Briefing Note 8. www.cgap.org.uk/research/briefing-papers.html (accessed 26.11.2017).
Google Scholar
Koschmann, M. A. (2012). The communicative constitution of collective identity in interorganizational collaboration. Management Communication Quarterly, 27, 6189.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Le Roy, F., Fernandez, A-S. (2015). Managing coopetitive tensions at the working-group level: The rise of the coopetitive project team. British Journal of Management, 26, 671688.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Levesque, J-F., Harris, M. F., Scott, C., Crabtree, B., Miller, W., Halma, L. M., Hogg, W. E., Weenink, J-W., Advocat, J. R., Gunn, J., Russell, G. (2018). Dimensions and intensity of inter-professional teamwork in primary care: Evidence from five international jurisdictions. Family Practice, 35, 285294.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Li, J., Robertson, T. (2011). Physical space and information space: Studies of collaboration in distributed multi-disciplinary medical team meetings. Behaviour and Information Technology, 30, 443454.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Linden, R. M. (2002). Working across boundaries: Making collaboration work in governmental and nonprofit organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Madsen, C. Ø., Larsen, M. V., Hersted, L., Rasmussen, J. G. (2018). Relational research and organization studies. New York and London: Routledge.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mallett, O., Wapshott, R. (2012). Mediating ambiguity: Narrative identity and knowledge workers. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28, 1626.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Marcos, J., Denyer, D. (2012). Crossing the sea from they to we? The unfolding of knowing and practicing in collaborative research. Management Learning, 43, 443459.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Martin, J. A., Eisenhardt, K. M. (2010). Rewiring: Cross-business-unit collaborations in multibusiness organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 265301.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
van Marrewijk, A., Ybema, S., Smits, K., Clegg, S., Pitsis, T. (2016). Clash of the Titans: Temporal organizing and collaborative dynamics in the Panama Canal megaproject. Organization Studies, 37, 17451769.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Orr, K. M., Bennett, M. (2012). Down and out at the British Library and other dens of co-production. Management Learning, 43, 427442.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ospina, S. M., Dodge, J. (2005). Narrative inquiry and the search for connectedness: Practitioners and academics developing public administration scholarship. Public Administration Review, 65, 409423.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pouthier, V. (2017). Griping and joking as identification rituals and tools for engagement in cross-boundary team meetings. Organization Studies, 38, 753774.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ramsey, C. (2008). Managing to learn: The social poetics of a polyphonic ‘classroom’. Organization Studies, 29, 543558.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ren, H., Gray, B. (2009). Repairing relationship conflict: How violation types and culture influence the effectiveness of restoration rituals. Academy of Management Review, 34, 105126.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rhodes, C., Pullen, A., Clegg, S. R. (2010). ‘If I should fall from grace…’: Stories of change and organizational ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 91, 535551.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences. Ed. and Trans. Thompson, J. B. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [2005].
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ricoeur, P. (1990). Time and narrative volume 3. Trans. Blamey, K., Pellauer, D. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [first published 1985].
Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1991). The human experience of time and narrative. In Valdés, M. J. (Ed.), A Ricoeur reader: Reflection and Imagination (pp. 99116). University of Toronto Press.
Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Trans. Blamey, K. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Ricoeur, P. (2006). On translation: Thinking in action. Trans. Brennan, E. London and New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Rondinelli, D. A., London, T. (2003). How corporations and environmental groups cooperate: Assessing cross-sector alliances and collaborations. Academy of Management Executive, 17, 6176.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sandberg, J., Tsoukas, H. (2011). Grasping the logic of practice: Theorizing through practical rationality. Academy of Management Review, 36, 338360.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Schwab, A., Miner, A. S. (2008). Learning in hybrid-project systems: The effects of project performance on repeated collaboration. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 11171149.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sharma, A., Kearins, K. (2011). Interorganizational collaboration for regional sustainability: What happens when organizational representatives come together? Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47, 168203.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Shotter, J. (1996a). Living in a Wittgensteinian world: Beyond theory to a poetics of practices. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 26, 293311.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Shotter, J , (1996b). ‘Now I can go on’: Wittgenstein and our embodied embeddedness in the ‘hurly-burly’ of life. Human Studies, 19, 385407.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Shotter, J. (2008) [1993]. Conversational realities revisited: Life language, body and world. Chagrin Falls, OH: Taos Institute Publications.
Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (2009). Bateson, double description, Todes, and embodiment: Preparing activities and their relation to abduction. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 39, 221245.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Shotter, J. (2011). Embodiment, abduction, and expressive movement: A new realm of inquiry? Theory & Psychology, 21, 439456.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Shotter, J. (2014). Practice-based methods for practitioners in inquiring into the continuous co-emergent “stuff” of everyday life. In Simon, G., Chard, A. (Eds.), Systemic inquiry for innovations in reflexive practitioner research (pp. 95123). London: Everything is Connected Press.
Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (2016). Speaking actually: Towards a new ‘fluid’ common-sense understanding of relational becomings. London: Everything is Connected Press.
Google Scholar
Silva, T., Pina, e, Cunha, M., Clegg, S. R., Neves, P., Rego, A., Rodrigues, R. A. (2014). Smells like team spirit: Opening a paradoxical black box. Human Relations, 67, 287310.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sparrowe, R. T. (2005). Authentic leadership and the narrative self. Leadership Quarterly, 16, 419439.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tan, H., Wilson, A., Olver, I. (2009). Ricoeur’s theory of interpretation: An instrument for data interpretation in hermeneutic phenomenology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 15.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

OSS-article-ppv for GBP29.00
OSS-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP241.98
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $292.66