Abstract
Cohabitation has become the modal path to marriage in the United States. However, little is known about what cohabitation means to young adults today. Drawing on data from 18 focus groups (N = 138) and 54 in-depth interviews with young adults, this exploratory study investigates motivations to cohabit and examines potential gender differences in those motivations and the meanings attached to them. The authors find that primary motives to cohabit include spending time together, sharing expenses, and evaluating compatibility. Strong gender differences emerge in how respondents discuss these themes and how they characterize the drawbacks of cohabitation, with men more concerned about loss of freedom and women with delays in marriage. Overall, the findings of this study suggest that gendered cultural norms governing intimate relationships extend to cohabiting unions and point to gender differences in the perceived role of cohabitation in union formation processes.
|
Albrecht, T.L. , Johnson, G.M. , & Walther, J.B. ( 1993). Understanding communication processes in focus groups . In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 51-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Avellar, S. , & Smock, P.J. ( 2005). The economic consequences of the dissolution of cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 315-327. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Blumstein, P. , & Schwartz, P. ( 1983). American couples: Money work sex. New York, NY: William Morrow. Google Scholar | |
|
Brines, J. , & Joyner, K. ( 1999). The ties that bind: Commitment and stability in the modern union. American Sociological Review, 64, 333-356. Google Scholar | |
|
Brown, S.L. ( 2000). Union transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 833-846. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Browne, I. , & Misra, J. ( 2003). The intersection of gender and race in the labor market . Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 487-513. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Bulcroft, R.A. , Bulcroft, K.A. , Bradley, K. , & Simpson, C. ( 2000). The management and production of risk in romantic relationships: A postmodern paradox. Journal of Family History, 25, 63-92. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Bumpass, L. , & Lu, H. ( 2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts. Population Studies, 54, 29-41. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Bumpass, L.L. , Sweet, J.A. , & Cherlin, A. ( 1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 913-927. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Carlson, M. , McLanahan, S. , & England, P. ( 2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography, 41, 237-261. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Charmaz, K. ( 2001). Grounded theory. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations (pp. 335-353). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Clarkberg, M.E. , Stolzenberg, R.M. , & Waite, L.J. ( 1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74, 609-634. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Collins, P.H. ( 1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13, 62-82. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Edin, K. ( 2000). What do low-income single mothers say about marriage ? Social Problems, 47, 112-133. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Glaser, B. , & Strauss, A. ( 1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine. Google Scholar | |
|
Gupta, Sanjiv. 1999. "The effects of transitions in marital status transitions on men’s performance of housework," Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, p. 700. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hollander, J.A. ( 2004). The social contexts of focus groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33, 602-637. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Jarrett, R.L. ( 1993). Focus group interviewing with low-income minority populations: A research experience. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 184-201). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
|
Jarrett, R.L. ( 1994). Living poor: Family life among single parent, African-American women. Social Problems, 41, 30-49. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Kennedy, S. , & Bumpass, L. ( 2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research , 19, 1663-1692. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Kenney, C. ( 2004). Cohabiting couple, filing jointly? Resource pooling and U.S. poverty policies. Family Relations, 53, 237-247. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Kitzinger, J. ( 1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness , 16, 103-121. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Knodel, J. ( 1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
|
Knodel, J. ( 1997). A case for nonanthropological qualitative methods for demographers. Population and Development Review, 23, 847-853. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
LaRossa, Ralph. ( 2005). "Grounded theory methods and qualitative research". Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4):837-857. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lichter, D. , McLaughlin, C. , Kephart, G. , & Landry, D. ( 1992). Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men? American Sociological Review, 57, 781-799. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lindsay, J.M. ( 2000). An ambiguous commitment: moving in to a cohabiting relationship . Journal of Family Studies, 6, 120-134. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Lye, D. , & Waldron, I. ( 1997). Attitudes toward cohabitation, family, and gender roles: Relationships to values and political ideology. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 199-125. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Manning, W.D. , & Jones, A. ( 2006, April). Cohabitation and marital dissolution. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, CA. Google Scholar | |
|
Manning, W.D. , & Smock, P.J. ( 2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 989-1002. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Miller, A. , & Sassler, S. ( 2006, August). Waiting to be asked: The gendered aspects of relationship progression among cohabiting couples. Roundtable discussion at the Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Google Scholar | |
|
Morgan, D.L. ( 1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Morgan, D.L. ( 1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology , 22, 129-152. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Morgan, D.L. ( 1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Morgan, D.L. ( 1998). The focus group guidebook (Focus Group Kit, Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
|
Oppenheimer, V. ( 2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career development process. Demography, 40, 127-149. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI | |
|
Patton, M.Q. ( 2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
|
Phillips, J.A. , & Sweeney, M.M. ( 2005). Premarital cohabitation and marital disruption among White, Black, and Mexican American women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 271-285. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Popenoe, D. , & Whitehead, B.D. (2000). The state of our union (2000): The social health of marriage in America. Retrieved from http://www.stateofourunions.org/pdfs/SOOU2000.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Raley, K. , & Bumpass, L. ( 2003). The topography of the divorce plateau: Levels and trends in union stability in the United States after 1980. Demographic Research, 8, 245-259. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Reneflot, A. ( 2006). A gender perspective on preferences for marriage among cohabiting couples. Demographic Research, 15, 311-328. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rhoades, G.K. , Stanley, S.M. , & Markman, H.J. ( 2006). Pre-engagement cohabitation and gender asymmetry in marital commitment. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 553-560. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Rhoades, G.K. , Stanley, S.M. , & Markman, H.J. ( 2009). Couples’ reasons for cohabitation: Associations with individual well-being and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 233-258. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Rindfuss, R. , & Vandenheuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review, 16, 703-726. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sanchez, L.S. , Manning, W.D. , & Smock, P.J. ( 1998). Sex: specialized or collaborative mate selection? Union transitions among cohabitors. Social Science Research, 27, 280-304. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sassler, S. ( 2004). The process of entering into cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 491-505. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sassler, S. , & Cunningham, A. (2008). How cohabitors view childbearing . Sociological Perspectives, 51, 3-29. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Sassler, S. , & McNally, J. ( 2003). Cohabiting couple’s economic circumstances and union transitions: A re-examination using multiple imputation techniques. Social Science Research, 32, 553-578. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Smock, P.J. ( 2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology , 26, 1-20. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Smock, P.J. , & Manning, W.D. ( 1997). Cohabiting partners’ economic circumstances and marriage. Demography, 34, 331-341. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Smock, P.J. , Manning, W.D. , & Porter, M. ( 2005). Everything’s there but the money: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680-696. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
South, S.J. , & Spitze, G. ( 1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327-347. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Stanley, S.M. , Rhoades, G.K. , & Markman, H.J. ( 2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499-509. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Strauss, A.M. , & Corbin, J.M. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | |
|
Sussman, S. , Burton, D. , Dent, C.W. , Stacy, A. , & Flay, B.R. ( 1991). Use of focus groups in developing an adolescent tobacco cessation program: Collective norm effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1772-1782. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sweeney, M. ( 2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67, 132-147. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sweet, J.A. , & Bumpass, L.L. ( 1992). Young adults’ view of marriage, cohabitation, and family. In S. J. South & S. E. Tolnay (Eds.), The changing American family: Sociological & demographic perspectives (pp. 143-170). Boulder, CO: Westview. Google Scholar | |
|
Teachman, J.D. ( 2003). Premarital sex, premarital cohabitation, and the risk of subsequent marital dissolution among women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 444-455. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Thornton, A. , Axinn, W. , & Xie, Y. ( 2007). Marriage and cohabitation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Umana-Taylor, A. , & Bamaca, M.Y. ( 2004). Conducting focus groups with Latino populations: Lessons from the field. Family Relations, 53, 262-272. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2005). Fertility, family planning, & the health of U.S. women: Data from the (2002) National Survey of Family Growth, Series 23-25 . Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics. Google Scholar | |
|
Weber, L. ( 1998). A conceptual framework for understanding race, class, gender and sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 13-32. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Winkler, A. ( 1997). Economic decision-making by cohabitors: Findings regarding income pooling. Applied Economics, 29, 1079-1090. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wu, Zheng and Michael S. Pollard. 2000. "Economic Circumstances and the Stability of Nonmarital Cohabitation", Journal of Family Issues, 21, 303-356. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Xie, Y. , Raymo, J. , Goyette, K. , & Thornton, A. ( 2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation . Demography, 40, 351-367. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
