He Says, She Says: Gender and Cohabitation

First Published February 3, 2011 Research Article Find in PubMed

Authors

University of California, Hastings College of the Law, San Francisco, CA, USA, [email protected]
by this author
,
The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
by this author
,
Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH, USA
by this author
,
East Connecticut State University, Willimantic, CT, USA
by this author
First Published Online: February 3, 2011

Cohabitation has become the modal path to marriage in the United States. However, little is known about what cohabitation means to young adults today. Drawing on data from 18 focus groups (N = 138) and 54 in-depth interviews with young adults, this exploratory study investigates motivations to cohabit and examines potential gender differences in those motivations and the meanings attached to them. The authors find that primary motives to cohabit include spending time together, sharing expenses, and evaluating compatibility. Strong gender differences emerge in how respondents discuss these themes and how they characterize the drawbacks of cohabitation, with men more concerned about loss of freedom and women with delays in marriage. Overall, the findings of this study suggest that gendered cultural norms governing intimate relationships extend to cohabiting unions and point to gender differences in the perceived role of cohabitation in union formation processes.

Albrecht, T.L. , Johnson, G.M. , & Walther, J.B. ( 1993). Understanding communication processes in focus groups . In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 51-64). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Avellar, S. , & Smock, P.J. ( 2005). The economic consequences of the dissolution of cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 315-327.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Blumstein, P. , & Schwartz, P. ( 1983). American couples: Money work sex. New York, NY: William Morrow.
Google Scholar
Brines, J. , & Joyner, K. ( 1999). The ties that bind: Commitment and stability in the modern union. American Sociological Review, 64, 333-356.
Google Scholar
Brown, S.L. ( 2000). Union transitions among cohabitors: The significance of relationship assessments and expectations. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62, 833-846.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Browne, I. , & Misra, J. ( 2003). The intersection of gender and race in the labor market . Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 487-513.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bulcroft, R.A. , Bulcroft, K.A. , Bradley, K. , & Simpson, C. ( 2000). The management and production of risk in romantic relationships: A postmodern paradox. Journal of Family History, 25, 63-92.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bumpass, L. , & Lu, H. ( 2000). Trends in cohabitation and implications for children’s family contexts. Population Studies, 54, 29-41.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Bumpass, L.L. , Sweet, J.A. , & Cherlin, A. ( 1991). The role of cohabitation in declining rates of marriage . Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 913-927.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Carlson, M. , McLanahan, S. , & England, P. ( 2004). Union formation in fragile families. Demography, 41, 237-261.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Charmaz, K. ( 2001). Grounded theory. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research: Perspectives and formulations (pp. 335-353). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
Google Scholar
Clarkberg, M.E. , Stolzenberg, R.M. , & Waite, L.J. ( 1995). Attitudes, values, and entrance into cohabitational versus marital unions. Social Forces, 74, 609-634.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Collins, P.H. ( 1998). It’s all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia, 13, 62-82.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Edin, K. ( 2000). What do low-income single mothers say about marriage ? Social Problems, 47, 112-133.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Glaser, B. , & Strauss, A. ( 1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Google Scholar
Gupta, Sanjiv. 1999. "The effects of transitions in marital status transitions on men’s performance of housework," Journal of Marriage and Family, 61, p. 700.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hollander, J.A. ( 2004). The social contexts of focus groups. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 33, 602-637.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Jarrett, R.L. ( 1993). Focus group interviewing with low-income minority populations: A research experience. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 184-201). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Jarrett, R.L. ( 1994). Living poor: Family life among single parent, African-American women. Social Problems, 41, 30-49.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kennedy, S. , & Bumpass, L. ( 2008). Cohabitation and children’s living arrangements: New estimates from the United States. Demographic Research , 19, 1663-1692.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Kenney, C. ( 2004). Cohabiting couple, filing jointly? Resource pooling and U.S. poverty policies. Family Relations, 53, 237-247.
Google Scholar | ISI
Kitzinger, J. ( 1994). The methodology of focus groups: The importance of interaction between research participants. Sociology of Health & Illness , 16, 103-121.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Knodel, J. ( 1993). The design and analysis of focus group studies: A practical approach. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 35-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Knodel, J. ( 1997). A case for nonanthropological qualitative methods for demographers. Population and Development Review, 23, 847-853.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
LaRossa, Ralph. ( 2005). "Grounded theory methods and qualitative research". Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4):837-857.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lichter, D. , McLaughlin, C. , Kephart, G. , & Landry, D. ( 1992). Race and the retreat from marriage: A shortage of marriageable men? American Sociological Review, 57, 781-799.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lindsay, J.M. ( 2000). An ambiguous commitment: moving in to a cohabiting relationship . Journal of Family Studies, 6, 120-134.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lye, D. , & Waldron, I. ( 1997). Attitudes toward cohabitation, family, and gender roles: Relationships to values and political ideology. Sociological Perspectives, 40, 199-125.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Manning, W.D. , & Jones, A. ( 2006, April). Cohabitation and marital dissolution. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Los Angeles, CA.
Google Scholar
Manning, W.D. , & Smock, P.J. ( 2005). Measuring and modeling cohabitation: New perspectives from qualitative data. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 989-1002.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Miller, A. , & Sassler, S. ( 2006, August). Waiting to be asked: The gendered aspects of relationship progression among cohabiting couples. Roundtable discussion at the Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Google Scholar
Morgan, D.L. ( 1993). Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Morgan, D.L. ( 1996). Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology , 22, 129-152.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Morgan, D.L. ( 1997). Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Morgan, D.L. ( 1998). The focus group guidebook (Focus Group Kit, Vol. 1). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Oppenheimer, V. ( 2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career development process. Demography, 40, 127-149.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Patton, M.Q. ( 2001). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Phillips, J.A. , & Sweeney, M.M. ( 2005). Premarital cohabitation and marital disruption among White, Black, and Mexican American women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 271-285.
Google Scholar | ISI
Popenoe, D. , & Whitehead, B.D. (2000). The state of our union (2000): The social health of marriage in America. Retrieved from http://www.stateofourunions.org/pdfs/SOOU2000.pdf
Google Scholar
Raley, K. , & Bumpass, L. ( 2003). The topography of the divorce plateau: Levels and trends in union stability in the United States after 1980. Demographic Research, 8, 245-259.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Reneflot, A. ( 2006). A gender perspective on preferences for marriage among cohabiting couples. Demographic Research, 15, 311-328.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rhoades, G.K. , Stanley, S.M. , & Markman, H.J. ( 2006). Pre-engagement cohabitation and gender asymmetry in marital commitment. Journal of Family Psychology, 20, 553-560.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Rhoades, G.K. , Stanley, S.M. , & Markman, H.J. ( 2009). Couples’ reasons for cohabitation: Associations with individual well-being and relationship quality. Journal of Family Issues, 30, 233-258.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Rindfuss, R. , & Vandenheuvel, A. (1990). Cohabitation: A precursor to marriage or an alternative to being single? Population and Development Review, 16, 703-726.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sanchez, L.S. , Manning, W.D. , & Smock, P.J. ( 1998). Sex: specialized or collaborative mate selection? Union transitions among cohabitors. Social Science Research, 27, 280-304.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sassler, S. ( 2004). The process of entering into cohabiting unions. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 491-505.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sassler, S. , & Cunningham, A. (2008). How cohabitors view childbearing . Sociological Perspectives, 51, 3-29.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sassler, S. , & McNally, J. ( 2003). Cohabiting couple’s economic circumstances and union transitions: A re-examination using multiple imputation techniques. Social Science Research, 32, 553-578.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Smock, P.J. ( 2000). Cohabitation in the United States: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology , 26, 1-20.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Smock, P.J. , & Manning, W.D. ( 1997). Cohabiting partners’ economic circumstances and marriage. Demography, 34, 331-341.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Smock, P.J. , Manning, W.D. , & Porter, M. ( 2005). Everything’s there but the money: How money shapes decisions to marry among cohabitors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 680-696.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
South, S.J. , & Spitze, G. ( 1994). Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review, 59, 327-347.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Stanley, S.M. , Rhoades, G.K. , & Markman, H.J. ( 2006). Sliding versus deciding: Inertia and the premarital cohabitation effect. Family Relations, 55, 499-509.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Strauss, A.M. , & Corbin, J.M. ( 1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Google Scholar
Sussman, S. , Burton, D. , Dent, C.W. , Stacy, A. , & Flay, B.R. ( 1991). Use of focus groups in developing an adolescent tobacco cessation program: Collective norm effects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21, 1772-1782.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sweeney, M. ( 2002). Two decades of family change: The shifting economic foundations of marriage. American Sociological Review, 67, 132-147.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sweet, J.A. , & Bumpass, L.L. ( 1992). Young adults’ view of marriage, cohabitation, and family. In S. J. South & S. E. Tolnay (Eds.), The changing American family: Sociological & demographic perspectives (pp. 143-170). Boulder, CO: Westview.
Google Scholar
Teachman, J.D. ( 2003). Premarital sex, premarital cohabitation, and the risk of subsequent marital dissolution among women. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65, 444-455.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Thornton, A. , Axinn, W. , & Xie, Y. ( 2007). Marriage and cohabitation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Umana-Taylor, A. , & Bamaca, M.Y. ( 2004). Conducting focus groups with Latino populations: Lessons from the field. Family Relations, 53, 262-272.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. ( 2005). Fertility, family planning, & the health of U.S. women: Data from the (2002) National Survey of Family Growth, Series 23-25 . Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
Google Scholar
Weber, L. ( 1998). A conceptual framework for understanding race, class, gender and sexuality. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 13-32.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Winkler, A. ( 1997). Economic decision-making by cohabitors: Findings regarding income pooling. Applied Economics, 29, 1079-1090.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wu, Zheng and Michael S. Pollard. 2000. "Economic Circumstances and the Stability of Nonmarital Cohabitation", Journal of Family Issues, 21, 303-356.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Xie, Y. , Raymo, J. , Goyette, K. , & Thornton, A. ( 2003). Economic potential and entry into marriage and cohabitation . Demography, 40, 351-367.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

JFI-article-ppv for GBP29.00
JFI-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP167.66
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $214.95