Abstract
This article analyses crowdwork platforms where various forms of digital labour are outsourced to digital workers across the globe. The labour of these workers is, among other things, a crucial component in the production, development and support of artificial intelligence. Crowdwork platforms are an extreme example of new forms of automated measurement, management and control of labour allowing, in turn, for the creation of hyperflexible and highly scalable workforces. Particularly on so-called microtask platforms, work is characterised by decomposition, standardisation, automated management and surveillance, as well as algorithmically organised cooperation between a great number of workers. Analysing these platforms as a paradigmatic example of an emerging digital Taylorism, the article goes on to argue that this allows the platforms to assemble a deeply heterogeneous set of workers while bypassing the need to spatially and subjectively homogenise them. These platforms create a global on-demand workforce, working in their private homes or Internet cafes. As a result, crowdwork taps into labour pools hitherto almost inaccessible to wage labour. The second part of the article investigates this tendency by looking at two sets of workers: women shouldering care responsibilities, who now can work on crowdwork platforms while performing domestic labour, as well as digital workers in the Global South. While there are clear specifics of digital crowdwork, it is also an expression of broader transformations within the world of work, concerning, for example, new forms of algorithmic management just as the return of very old forms of exploitation such as the piece wage.
References
|
Altenried, M (2018) The digital factory. PhD Thesis, Goldsmiths, University of London, London. Google Scholar | |
|
Altenried, M, Wallis, M (2018) Zurück in die Zukunft: Digitale Heimarbeit. Ökologisches Wirtschaften 4: 24–27. Google Scholar | |
|
AP (2018) Ai’s dirty little secret: It’s powered by people. Available at: https://apnews.com/31b235a9ed404e8c912ce8224e3929c0 (accessed 9 January 2020). Google Scholar | |
|
Aytes, A (2013) Return of the crowds: Mechanical Turk and neoliberal states of exception. In: Scholz, T (ed.) Digital Labor: The Internet as Playground and Factory. London: Routledge, pp. 79–97. Google Scholar | |
|
Beerepoot, N, Kloosterman, R, Lambregts, B (2015) The Local Impact of Globalization in South and Southeast Asia. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Berg, J, Furrer, M, Harmon, E, et al. (2018) Digital Labour Platforms and the Future of Work: Towards Decent Work in the Online World. Geneva: International Labour Office. Google Scholar | |
|
Bezos, J (2006) Opening keynote and keynote interview (Video). MIT Techtv, 27 September. Available at: http://techtv.mit.edu/videos/16180-opening-keynote-and-keynote-interview-with-jeff-bezos (accessed 27 July 2018). Google Scholar | |
|
Brown, P, Lauder, H, Ashton, D (2012) The Global Auction: The Broken Promises of Education, Jobs, and Incomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Easterling, K (2014) Extrastatecraft: The Power of Infrastructure Space. London: Verso Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Fang, L (2019) Google hired gig economy workers to improve artificial intelligence in controversial drone-targeting project. The Intercept, 5 February. Available at: https://theintercept.com/2019/02/04/google-ai-project-maven-figure-eight/ (accessed 27 February 2019). Google Scholar | |
|
Graham, M, Mann, L (2013) Imagining a silicon Savannah? Technological and conceptual connectivity in Kenya’s BPO and software development sectors. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries 56: 1–19. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Graham, M, Woodcock, J (2018) Towards a fairer platform economy: Introducing the fairwork foundation. Alternate Routes 29: 242–253. Google Scholar | |
|
Graham, M, Hjorth, I, Lehdonvirta, V (2017) Digital labour and development: Impacts of global digital labour platforms and the gig economy on worker livelihoods. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research 23(2): 135–162. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Head, S (2005) The New Ruthless Economy: Work and Power in the Digital Age. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Head, S (2014) Mindless: Why Smarter Machines Are Making Dumber Humans. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Irani, L (2015a) Difference and dependence among digital workers: The case of Amazon mechanical Turk. South Atlantic Quarterly 114(1): 225–234. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Irani, L (2015b) The cultural work of microwork. New Media & Society 17(5): 720–739. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Kucklick, C (2011) SMS-Adler. Brandeins 4: 26–34. Google Scholar | |
|
Kuek, SC, Paradi-Guilford, C, Fayomi, T, et al. (2015) The Global Opportunity in Online Outsourcing. Washington, DC: World Bank. Google Scholar | |
|
Marx, K (2004) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1. London: Penguin Books. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Mezzadra, S, Neilson, B (2013) Border as Method, or, the Multiplication of Labor. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Nachtwey, O, Staab, P (2015) Die Avantgarde des digitalen Kapitalismus. Mittelweg 36(24): 59–84. Google Scholar | |
|
Shah, N (2016) Free basics by Facebook – An interview with Nishant Shah by Inga Luchs. Spheres: Journal for Digital Cultures. Available at: http://spheres-journal.org/interview-on-internet-org/ (accessed 27 July 2018). Google Scholar | |
|
Shapiro, DN, Chandler, J, Mueller, PA (2013) Using mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clinical Psychological Science 1(2): 213–220. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Silberman, MS, Irani, L (2016) Operating an employer reputation system: Lessons from Turkopticon, 2008-2015. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37(3): 505–541. Google Scholar | |
|
Zuckerberg, M (2014) Is connectivity a human right? Available at: https://www.facebook.com/isconnectivityahumanright (accessed 27 July 2018). Google Scholar |

