Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1996

Assessment of Guardrail-Strengthening Techniques

Barry T. Rosson, Mark G. Bierman, and John R. RohdeView all authors and affiliations
Volume 1528, Issue 1
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198196152800107

Abstract

Guardrail-strengthening techniques were assessed by full-scale crash testing according to Service Level 2 conditions of NCHRP Report 230 and by BARRIER VII computer simulation. The Kansas Department of Transportation's standard W-beam with steel posts guardrail was strengthened by nesting the W-beam and by reducing the post spacing. Computer simulations with BARRIER VII were used to assess the various strengthening techniques for guardrails with standard and extended post lengths installed in clay and sand. The soil-post stiffness parameters used in the program were obtained by conducting 21 post impact tests with a 1388-kg bogie striking a post at 33 km/hr. The guardrails constructed with W6 × 8.5 steel posts and 15.2 × 20.3-cm timber posts behaved similarly under all test conditions. The density of the clay has a profound effect on the lateral dynamic deflections. Nesting the W-beam to strengthen the guardrail provides very little benefit, whereas reducing the post spacing by half provides the greatest benefit.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

1. Bierman M. G., Rosson B. T., Sicking D. L., and Rohde J. R. Performance Evaluation of KDOT W-Beam Systems. Research Report 03-39-93. Midwest Regional Pooled Fund Program, in preparation.
Google Scholar
2. NCHRP Report 230: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Appurtenances. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, 42 pp.
Google Scholar
3. Powell G. H. BARRIER VII: A Computer Program for Evaluation of Automobile Barrier Systems. Report FHWA-RD-73-51. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, April 1973.
Google Scholar
4. Hargrave M. W., and Hansen A. G. Federal Outdoor Impact Laboratory—A New Facility for Evaluating Roadside Safety Hardware. In Transportation Research Record 1198, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 90–96.
Google Scholar
5. Michie J. D. Response of Guardrail Posts During Impact. Research Report 03-9051. Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Tex., Oct. 1970.
Google Scholar
6. Michie J. D., Gatchell C. J., and Duke T. J. Dynamic Evaluation of Timber Posts for Highway Guardrails. In Highway Research Record 343, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1971, pp. 19–33.
Google Scholar
7. Calcote L. R., and Kimball C. E. Properties of Guardrail Posts for Various Soil Types. In Transportation Research Record 679, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 22–25.
Google Scholar
8. Bronstad M. E., Calcote L. R., Ray M. H., and Mayer J. B. Guardrail-Bridge Rail Transition Designs. Report FHWA-RD-86-178. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, April 1986.
Google Scholar

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Volume 1528, Issue 1
Pages: 69 - 77
Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996

Rights and permissions

© 1996 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Barry T. Rosson
Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Civil Engineering Department, 1901 Y Street, Building C, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebr. 68588-0601.
View all articles by this author
Mark G. Bierman
Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Civil Engineering Department, 1901 Y Street, Building C, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebr. 68588-0601.
View all articles by this author
John R. Rohde
Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Civil Engineering Department, 1901 Y Street, Building C, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebr. 68588-0601.
View all articles by this author

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 10

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Midwest Guardrail System for Standard and Special Applications
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Subscribe to this journal

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

Start 2 week free trial
Need help?

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub
Download PDF

Also from Sage