Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1996

Guardrail Runout Lengths Revisited

Abstract

The guardrail runout length recommendations contained in AASHTO's Roadside Design Guide were reevaluated to determine optimal guardrail length of need. Encroachment data collected along Canadian highways were evaluated in a manner similar to that used with other encroachment data to reproduce the procedures contained in AASHTO's Roadside Design Guide. A cost-benefit analysis of extending guardrails was also conducted as an alternative procedure for defining appropriate guardrail runout lengths. Both analysis procedures indicate that the guardrail runout lengths recommended by the Roadside Design Guide are excessive. Highway agencies are advised to select one of the two new procedures for identifying appropriate guardrail runout lengths.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Roadside Design Guide. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1989.
2. Griffin L. I. An Analysis of Accidents on Turned-Down Guardrail Ends in the State of Texas. Report No. 9901-H. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, May 1991.
3. Hutchinson J. W., and Kennedy T. W. Medians of Divided Highways—Frequency and Nature of Vehicle Encroachments. Engineering Experiment Station Bulletin 487. University of Illinois, Champaign, June 1966.
4. Cooper P. Analysis of Roadside Encroachments—Single Vehicle Run-off-the-Road Accident Data Analysis for Five Provinces. British Columbia Research Council, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, March 1980.
5. Sicking D. L., and Wolford D. F. Development of Guardrail Runout Length Calculation Procedures. Draft Final Report. Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, June 1995.
6. Guide for Selecting, Locating, and Designing Traffic Barriers. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1977.
7. Hatton J. H. Jr. A Roadside Design Procedure. Unpublished Report. Office of Engineering, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1974.
8. Sicking D. L., and Ross H. E. Jr. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Roadside Safety Alternatives. In Transportation Research Record 1065, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1986.
9. Ross H. E. Jr., and Sicking D. L. Guidelines for Use of Temporary Barriers in Work Zones, Vol. I. Final Report. Research Report 4151-1. Contract DOT-F H-11-9688. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, College Station, July 1983.
10. Benefit to Cost Analysis Program. Publication FHWA-TS-88. Research, Development, and Technology, Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center, McLean, Va., June 1988.
11. Olsen R. M. et al. NCHRP Report 149: Bridge Rail Design Factors, Trends, and Guidelines. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1974, 70 pp.
12. Roadside Design Guide. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1995.
13. Erinle O., Hunter W. et al. An Analysis and Median Barrier Accidents Using the Longitudinal Barrier Special Studies (LBSS) File, Vol. I. Final Report. Report FHWA-RD-92-098. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1992.
14. Ross H. E. Jr.et al. Traffic Barriers and Control Treatments for Restricted Work Zones. Final Report. NCHRP Project 17-8. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, College Station, Nov. 1991.
15. Mak K. K. et al. Severity Measures for Roadside Objects and Features, Vol. I. Technical Report. Report FHWA/RD-86/019. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1986.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996

Rights and permissions

© 1996 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dan Wolford
Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Center for Infrastructure Research, Civil Engineering Department, 1901 Y Street, Building C, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebr. 68588-0601.
Dean L. Sicking
Midwest Roadside Safety Facility, Center for Infrastructure Research, Civil Engineering Department, 1901 Y Street, Building C, University of Nebraska—Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebr. 68588-0601.

Notes

The contents of this report reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of the Nebraska Department of Roads or FHWA. This report does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 15

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Corridor-Based Procedure for Determining Longitudinal Barrier Length o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. An improved mathematical model for vehicle crashagainst highway guardr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Guardrail Run-Out Length Design Procedures Revisited
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Reexamination of Roadside Encroachment Data
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub