Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1996

Crashworthiness Simulations with DYNA3D

Abstract

Current progress in parallel algorithm research and applications in vehicle crash simulation is described for the explicit, finite-element algorithms in DYNA3D. Two challenging algorithm research problems are addressed: problem partitioning methods and parallel algorithms for contact at material interfaces. Two prototype parallel contact algorithms have been developed for treating the cases of local and arbitrary contact. Demonstration problems for local contact are crashworthiness simulations with 22 locally defined contact surfaces and a vehicle-barrier collision modeled with arbitrary contact. A simulation of crash tests conducted for a vehicle striking a U-channel small signpost embedded in soil has been run on both the serial and parallel versions of DYNA3D. A significant reduction in computational time has been observed when running these problems on the parallel version. However, to achieve maximum efficiency, complex problems must be appropriately partitioned, especially when contact dominates the computation.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Whirley R. G., and Engelmann B. E. DYNA3D: A Nonlinear, Explicit, Three Dimensional Finite Element Code for Solid and Structural Mechanics—User Manual. UCRL-MA-107254 Rev. 1. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, Calif., 1993.
2. Hendrickson B., and Leland R. Technical Report SAND 92-1460. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, N.M., 1992.
3. Hendrickson B., and Leland R. Technical Report SAND 93-2339. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, N.M., 1993.
4. Procassini R. J., De Groot A. J., and Maltby J. D. PARTMESH: Partitioning Unstructured Finite Element Meshes for Solution on a Massively Parallel Processor—User Manual. UCRL-MA-118774. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, Calif., 1994.
5. Whirley R. G., and Engelmann B. E. Automatic Contact in DYNA3D for Vehicle Crashworthiness. UCRL-53868-93. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, Calif., 1994, pp. 2–29.
6. Benson D. J., and Hallquist J. O. A Single Surface Contact Algorithm for the Post-Buckling Analysis of Shell Structures. Computer Methods and Applied Mechanics, Vol. 78, 1990, p. 141.
7. Ross H. E., Sicking D. L., Zimmer R. A., and Michie J. D. NHCHRP Report 350: Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993.
8. MADYMO USER'S MANUAL 3D. TNO Road-Safety Research Institute, Delft, The Netherlands, 1992.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996

Rights and permissions

© 1996 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dale A. Schauer
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Box 808, Livermore, Calif. 94551.
Carol G. Hoover
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Box 808, Livermore, Calif. 94551.
Gregory J. Kay
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Box 808, Livermore, Calif. 94551.
Anthony S. Lee
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Box 808, Livermore, Calif. 94551.
Anthony J. De Groot
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Box 808, Livermore, Calif. 94551.

Notes

This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither the U.S. Government nor the University of California nor any of their employees makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Government or the University of California. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Government or the University of California and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 6

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub