To see and be seen, to know and be known: Perceptions and prevention strategies on Facebook surveillance

First Published October 12, 2017 Research Article

Authors

Institute of Social Sciences of the University of Lisbon (ICS-ULisboa), Portugal
by this author
,
University of Beira Interior and CICS.NOVA.UMinho, Portugal
by this author
First Published Online: October 12, 2017

With the increasing use of social networks, particularly Facebook, a large amount of data is made available. Such extensive and intensive disclosure of public and private matter aspects of individuals’ lives leads to theoretical and conceptual challenges. To answer some of these challenges, it is intended in this article, through the use of a qualitative methodology, to analyse the perceptions that Facebook users have of the surveillance they are subjected to, as well as the identification of prevention strategies that can be adopted. The interaction of these analysis dimensions has enabled the creation of a user typology that it is important, given the very recent nature of the object of this study, to confront and develop through new research.

Acquisti, A, Gross, R (2006) Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In: Danezis, G, Golle, P (eds) Lecture notes in computer science: vol. 4258. Privacy enhancing technologies. Cambridge: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 3658.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Albrechtslund, A (2008) Online Social Networking as Participatory Surveillance. First Monday 13(3). Available at: http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2142/1949 (accessed 1 April 2015).
Google Scholar
Andrejevic, M (2005) The work of watching one another: Lateral surveillance, risk, and governance. Surveillance & Society 2(4): 479497.
Google Scholar
Bauman, Z (2000) Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Bumgarner, BA (2007) You have been poked: Exploring the uses and gratifications of Facebook among emerging adults. First Monday 12(11). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2026/1897 (accessed 16 October 2013).
Google Scholar
Calvert, C (2000) Voyeur nation: Media, privacy, and peering in modern culture. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Google Scholar
Christofides, E, Muise, A, Desmarais, S (2010) Privacy and disclosure on Facebook: Youth and adults’ information disclosure and perception of privacy risks. Report for the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada.
Google Scholar
Dal Bello, C (2011) Visibilidade, vigilância, identidade e indexação: a questão da privacidade nas redes sociais digitais. Revista LOGOS – Dossiê – O estatuto da Cibercultura no Brasil 18(1). Available at: http://www.e-publicacoes.uerj.br/index.php/logos/article/view/1261 (accessed 1 December 2015).
Google Scholar
Expresso (2013) Espionagem dos EUA paga à Google, Microsoft e Facebook, Newspaper Expresso, 23 August 2013. Available at: http://expresso.sapo.pt/espionagem-dos-eua-paga-a-google-microsoft-e-facebook=f827198 (accessed 2 February 2015).
Google Scholar
Facebook (n.d.) Data Use Policy. Available at: https://www.Facebook.com/about/privacy (accessed 4 March 2014).
Google Scholar
Fuchs, C (2009) Social networking sites and the surveillance society: A critical case study of the usage of studiVZ, Facebook, and MySpace by students in Salzburg in the context of electronic surveillance. Research Group Unified Theory of Information ICT&S Center Research Report. Salzburg: University of Salzburg.
Google Scholar
Fuchs, C (2011) Web 2.0, prosumption, and surveillance. Surveillance & Society 8(3): 288309.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Fuchs, C (2012) Dallas Smythe today – the audience commodity, the digital labour debate, Marxist political economy and critical theory: Prolegomena to a digital labour theory of value. TripleC 10(2): 692740.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Fuchs, C, Sevignani, S (2013) What is digital labour? What is digital work? What’s their difference? And why do these questions matter for understanding social media? Triple C 11(2): 237293.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ganascia, J-G (2010) The generalized sousveillance society. Social Science Information 49: 489507.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gilliom, J, Monahan, T (2013) SuperVision: An introduction to the Surveillance Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Good, NS, Grossklags, J, Mulligan, D, Konstan, JA (2007) Noticing notice: A large-scale experiment on the timing of software license agreements. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. San Jose: ACM Press. Available at: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.124.8044&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed 5 January 2016).
Google Scholar
Greene, D, Joseph, D (2015) The digital spatial fix. tripleC 13(2): 223247.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hull, G, Lipford, HR, Latulipe, C (2011) Contextual gaps: Privacy issues on Facebook. Ethics and Information Technology 13(4): 289302.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jaeger, E (2014) Facebook Messenger: Eroding user privacy in order to collect, analyze, and sell your personal information. John Marshall Journal of Information Technology & Privacy Law 31(3): 393421.
Google Scholar
Kadivar, J (2015) A comparative study of government surveillance of social media and mobile phone communications during Iran’s Green Movement (2009) and the UK Riots (2011). tripleC 13(1): 169191.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kirkpatrick, D (2011) O efeito Facebook. Lisboa: BABEL.
Google Scholar
Lahlou, S (2008) Identity, social status, privacy and face-keeping in digital society. Social Science Information 47: 299330.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Lampe, C, Ellison, NB, Steinfield, C (2006) A Face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. In: Hinds, P, Martin, D (eds) Proceedings of ACM specfic interest group on computersupportedcooperative work. Banff, Alberta, Canada: ACM, New York, 167170.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lyon, D (1994) The Electronic Eye: The rise of surveillance society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Lyon, D (2001) Surveillance Society: Monitoring everyday life. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Google Scholar
Lyon, D (2009) Identifying citizens – ID cards as surveillance. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Mann, S, Nolan, J, Wellman, B (2003) Sousveillance: Inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments. Surveillance & Society 1(3): 331355.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Marichal, J (2012) Facebook democracy: The architecture of disclousure and the threat to public life. Farnham: Ashgate.
Google Scholar
Marwick, A (2012) The public domain: Surveillance in everyday life. Surveillance & Society 9(4): 378393.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Marx, G (1988) Undercover: Police surveillance in America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Marx, G (2008) Vigilância Soft. In: Frois, C (ed.) A Sociedade Vigilante – Ensaios sobre identificação, vigilância e privacidade. Lisboa: ICS, 87109.
Google Scholar
Nelkin, D, Andrews, L (1993) Surveillance creep in the genetic age. In: Lyon, D (ed.) Surveillance as social sorting – privacy, risk and digital discrimination. London: Routledge, 94110.
Google Scholar
Netchitailova, E (2012) Facebook as a surveillance tool: From the perspective of the user. tripleC 10(2): 683691.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Netchitailova, E (2014) The flâneur, the badaud and empathetic worker. tripleC 12(1): 113.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Norris, C (2003) From personal to digital: CCTV, the panopticon, and the technological mediation of suspicion and social control. In: Lyon, D (ed.) Surveillance as social sorting – privacy, risk and digital discrimination. London: Routledge, 249281.
Google Scholar
Shore, J, Steinman, J (2015) Did you really agree to that? The evolution of Facebook’s privacy policy. Technology Science: 137. Available at: https://techscience.org/a/2015081102/#References (accessed 19 January 2016).
Google Scholar
Simões, MJ (2011) Surveillance: A (potential) threat to political participation? In: ICDS 2011: The Fifth International Conference on Digital Society. IARIA, 9499.
Google Scholar
Sinn, D, Syn, SY (2014) Personal documentation on a social network site: Facebook, a collection of moments from your life? Archival Science 14(2): 95124.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stalder, F, Lyon, D (2003) Electronic identity cards and social classification. In: Lyon, D (ed.) Surveillance as social sorting – privacy, risk and digital discrimination. London: Routledge, 7793.
Google Scholar
Stoycheff, E (2016) Under surveillance: Examining Facebook’s spiral of silence effects in the wake of NSA Internet monitoring. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 93(2): 296311.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Timan, T, Oudshoorn, N (2012) Mobile cameras as new technologies of surveillance? How citizens experience the use of mobile cameras in public nightscape. Surveillance & Society 10(2): 167181.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Van Der Ploeg, I (2003) Biometrics and the body as information: Normative issues of the socio-technical coding of the body. In: Lyon, D (ed.) Surveillance as social sorting – privacy, risk and digital discrimination. London: Routledge, 5573.
Google Scholar

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Access

    does not have access to this content.

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

SSI-article-ppv for GBP29.00
SSI-article-ppv for $37.50

Top