Inch by Inch: Gender Equity Since the Civil Rights Act of 1964
Abstract
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was influential in leveling the playing field for women. More than the actual protections afforded by the act itself, it triggered subsequent laws that collectively have lessened the pay gap, provided protections from harassment, and increased opportunities for women to participate in education, sports, and workplace opportunities that were previously reserved for men. However, the pace at which these changes have occurred has extended over generations, and the goal of parity has yet to be reached. This article traces legislation that has helped women advance in the workplace and concludes by arguing for the expansion of how gender is conceptualized. Rather than the dichotomous male/female view, gender equity should embrace fairness for all, wherever they fall on the continuum from masculine to feminine.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Alkadry M. G., Tower L. E. (2006). Unequal pay: The role of gender. Public Administration Review, 66, 888-898.
Alkadry M. G., Tower L. E. (2011). Covert pay discrimination: How authority predicts pay differences between men and women. Public Administration Review, 71, 740-750.
Belton R. (1990). The dismantling of the Griggs disparate impact theory and the future of Title VII: The need for a third reconstruction. Yale Law & Policy Review, 8, 223-256.
Bondurant B., Kleiner B. H. (2003). New developments concerning Title IX. Equal Opportunities International, 22, 24-30.
Boucher J. (2003). Betty Friedan and the radical past of liberal feminism. New Politics, 9, 23-32.
Civil Rights—Disparate Impact Doctrine. (1990). Court prohibits awarding scholarships on the basis of standardized tests that discriminatorily impact women. Harvard Law Review, 103, 806-811.
Cott N. F. (1984). Feminist politics in the 1920’s: The National Woman’s Party. The Journal of American History, 71, 43-68.
Eidmann K. A. (2008). Ledbetter in congress: The limits of a narrow legislative override. The Yale Law Journal, 117, 971-979.
Equal Employment Opportunities Commission. (2004, June 22). First principles-enacting the Civil Rights Act and using the courts to challenge and remedy workplace discrimination [Panel Presentation]. Celebrating the 40th Anniversary of Title VII, U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Retrieved from www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/history/40th/panel/40thpanels/panel1/transcript.html
Equal Employment Opportunities Commission. (2011). Sexual harassment charges: EEOC and FEPAs combined FY 1997-FY 2011. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/sexual_harassment.cfm
Equal Employment Opportunities Commission. (2012). U. S. Equal Employment Opportunities Commission. Available from www.eeoc.gov
General Electric Co. v. Gilbert et al., 429 U. S. 125 (1976).
Gold M. E. (1981). A tale of two amendments: The reasons Congress added sex to Title VII and their implication for the issue of comparable worth. Duquesne Law Review, 19, 453-477.
Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U. S. 424 (1971).
Grossman J. L., Thomas G. L. (2009). Making pregnancy work: Overcoming the Pregnancy Discrimination Act’s capacity-based model. Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 21, 15-50.
Guy M. E. (2011). In search of a middle ground: Preachy, screechy, and angry versus soft, sweet, and compliant. In D’Agostino M. J., Levine H. (Eds.), Women in public administration: Theory and practice (pp. 299-307). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Guy M. E., Calvert S. (1997). Gender issues in the workplace: Compensation, reproductive safety, family obligations, and sexual harassment. In Cooper P. J., Newland C. A. (Eds.), Handbook of public law and administration (pp. 314-343). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hebert C. L. (2011). The causal relationship of sex, pregnancy, lactation, and breastfeeding and the meaning of “because of . . . sex” under Title VII. The Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law, 12, 119-158.
Holmes S. A. (1990, October 23). President vetoes bill on job rights; Showdown is set. The New York Times. Retrieved from www.nytimes.com/1990/10/23/us/president-vetoes-bill-on-job-rights-showdown-is-set.html?pagewanted=all&src=pm
Hutchinson J. (2011). Feminist theories and their application to public administration. In D’Agostino M. J., Levine H. (Eds.), Women in public administration: Theory and practice (pp. 3-14). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Jackson R., Newman M. (2004). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace revisited: Influences on sexual harassment by gender. Public Administration Review, 64, 705-717.
Kramer Z. (2009). Heterosexuality and Title VII. Northwestern University Law Review, 103, 205-248.
Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U. S. 618 (2007).
London. (2012). Retrieved from www.london2012.com
Magid J. M. (2001). Pregnant with possibility: Reexamining the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. American Business Law Journal, 38, 819-856.
McKay R. B. (2007, February). A black community with advanced labor force characteristics in 1960. Monthly Labor Review, 130, 3-8.
National Coalition for Women and Girls in Education. (2008). Title IX at 35: Beyond the headlines. Retrieved from ncwge.org/PDF/TitleIXat35.pdf
Newman M., Jackson R., Baker D. (2003). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace. Public Administration Review, 63, 472-483.
Ng E. S. W., Schweitzer L., Lyons S. T. (2012). Anticipated discrimination and a career choice in nonprofit: A study of early career lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgendered (LGBT) job seekers. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 332-352.
Ng T. W. H., Eby L. T., Sorensen K. L., Feldman D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success. Personnel Psychology, 58, 367-408.
Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2012). Key characteristics of parental leave systems. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/social/family/PF2.1_Parental_leave_systems%20-%20updated%20%2018_July_2012.pdf
Oyer P., Schaefer S. (2003). The unintended consequences of the ’91 Civil Rights Act. Regulation, 26, 42-47.
Pedriana N. (2009). Discrimination by definition: The historical and legal paths to the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978 (Respecting Expecting: The 30th Anniversary of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act). Yale Journal of Law & Feminism, 21, 1-14.
Pelletier A. (2006). The Family Medical Leave Act of 1993: Why does parental leave in the United States fall so far behind Europe? Gonzaga Law Review, 42, 547-576.
Piskorski T. J., Warner M. A. (1992). The Civil Rights Act of 1991: Overview and analysis. The Labor Lawyer, 8, 9-17.
Reese C. C., Warner B. (2012). Pay equity in the states: An analysis of the gender-pay gap in the public sector. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 32, 312-331.
Riccucci N. M. (2009). The pursuit of social equity in the federal government: A road less traveled? Public Administration Review, 69, 373-382.
Rupp L. J. (1985). The women’s community in the National Woman’s Party, 1945 to the 1960s. Signs, 10, 715-740.
S. 1463. (2012). Breastfeeding Promotion Act of 2011. Retrieved from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/112/s1463
Sharif v. New York State Education Department, No. 88 Civ. 8435, S.D.N.Y. (1989).
Sorock C. E. (2010). Closing the gap legislatively: Consequences of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act (Symposium on the law of philanthropy in the twenty-first century). Chicago-Kent Law Review, 85, 1199-1216.
Stivers C. (2002). Gender images in public administration: Legitimacy and the administrative state (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Stivers C. (2010). A tactless question: Rejoinder to the forum on Bureau Men, Settlement Women. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32, 220-224.
Title VII—Gender Discrimination—Ninth circuit holds that women can be fired for refusing to wear makeup. (2006). Harvard Law Review, 120, 651-658.
Toossi M. (2002, May). A century of change: The U. S. labor force, 1950-2050. Monthly Labor Review, 125, 15-28.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1962). Educational attainment of the population of the United States: 1960, Table 173 [PC(S1)-37]. Retrieved from www.census.gov/hhes/socdemo/education/data/cps/1960/cp60pcs1-37/tab-173.pdf
U.S. Department of Education, Secretary’s Commission on Opportunity in Athletics. (2003). “Open to all”: Title IX at thirty. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/athletics/title9report.pdf
U.S. Department of Labor. (2010a). Fact sheet #28: The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993. Wage and Hour Division. Retrieved from www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs28.pdf
U.S. Department of Labor. (2010b). Fact sheet #28a: The Family and Medical Leave Act military family leave requirements. Wage and Hour Division. Retrieved from www.dol.gov/whd/regs/compliance/whdfs28a.pdf
U.S. Department of Labor. (2011a). BLS spotlight on statistics: Women at work. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/spotlight/2011/women/pdf/women_bls_spotlight.pdf
U.S. Department of Labor. (2011b). Women in the labor force: A databook (Report No. 1034). U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-databook-2011.pdf
U.S. Department of Labor. (2012, September 7). International labor force participation rates for women, 2011 (TED: The Editor’s Desk). U.S. Department of Labor, U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2012/ted_20120907.htm
Van Riper P. (1958). History of the United States civil service. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
Wards Cove Packing v. Antonio, 490 U. S. 642 (1989).
Westcott D. N. (1982, June). Blacks in the 1970s: Did they scale the job ladder? Monthly Labor Review, 105, 29-38.
Wetzel J. R. (1990, March). American families: 75 years of change. Monthly Labor Review, 113, 4-13.
Biographies
Mary E. Guy is a professor at the University of Colorado Denver, School of Public Affairs. Her research focuses on public management with emphasis on workforce diversity and the difference that gender makes in policy development and implementation.
Vanessa M. Fenley is a doctoral student at the University of Colorado Denver, School of Public Affairs. Her research interests include the influences of gender in public affairs and the effects of framing in policy processes.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: October 31, 2013
Issue published: March 2014
Keywords
History
Published online: October 31, 2013
Issue published: March 2014
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Review of Public Personnel Administration.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 3571
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Articles citing this one
Web of Science: 12 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 16
- Rule formalization, gender, and gender congruence: examining prosocial...
- The Role of Gender in Government and Nonprofit Workplaces: An Experime...
- Gendered Institutions in Global Health
- Diversity in the Legal Context
- Citizens’ perceptions of closing the gender pay gap: an experimental s...
- Intersectionality, Leadership, and Inclusion: How Do Racially Underrep...
- Equal Employment Opportunity: Women Bureaucrats in Male‐Dominated Prof...
- LGBTQ+ Civil Rights: Local Government Efforts in a Volatile Era
- The Human Capital Model or Location! Location! Location!? The Gender-B...
- Why Men and Women Want to Leave? Turnover Intent Among Public Procurem...
- Exploring the Antecedents of the Gender Pay Gap in U.S. Higher Educati...
- Perceived Civil Rights and Moral Competence in Iranian Adults
- Work Dissatisfaction and Sleep Problems among Canadians in the Latter ...
- Gender-Based Discrimination in the Workplace...
- Gender and the Law: 25 Years of Progress?
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
