Who Gets the Daddy Bonus?: Organizational Hegemonic Masculinity and the Impact of Fatherhood on Earnings

First Published December 1, 2010 Research Article

Authors

University of Massachusetts, Amherst, [email protected]
by this author
,
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
by this author
First Published Online: December 1, 2010

Using the 1979-2006 waves of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, we investigate how the earnings bonus for fatherhood varies by characteristics associated with hegemonic masculinity in the American workplace: heterosexual marital status, professional/managerial status, educational attainment, skill demands of jobs, and race/ethnicity. We find the earnings bonus for fatherhood persists after controlling for an array of differences, including human capital, labor supply, family structure, and wives’ employment status. Moreover, consistent with predictions from the theory of hegemonic masculinity within bureaucratic organizations, the fatherhood bonus is significantly larger for men with other markers of workplace hegemonic masculinity. Men who are white, married, in households with a traditional gender division of labor, college graduates, professional/managerial workers and whose jobs emphasize cognitive skills and deemphasize physical strength receive the largest fatherhood earnings bonuses.

Acker, J. 1990. Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations . Gender & Society 4:139-58.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Acker, J. 1998. The future of "gender and organizations": Connections and boundaries. Gender, Work, and Organization 5:195-206.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Allison, P. 2009. Fixed effects regression models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Anderson, D. , M. Binder , and K. Krause. 2002. The motherhood wage penalty: Which mothers pay it and why? American Economics Review 92:354-58.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Avellar, S. , and P. Smock. 2003. Has the price of motherhood declined over time? A cross-cohort comparison of the motherhood wage penalty. Journal of Marriage and Family 65:597-607.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Becker, G. 1981. A treatise on the gamily. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Bianchi, S. , J. Robinson , and M. Milkie. 2006. The changing rhythms of American family life. New York: Russell Sage Foundation .
Google Scholar
Buchmann, C. , and T. DiPrete. 2006. The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review 71:514-41.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Budig, Michelle J. , and P. England. 2001. The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review 44:204-25.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cheng, C. 1996. Masculinities in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Collins, P. 2006. A telling difference: Dominance, strength, and masculinities . In Progressive masculinities, edited by Athena Mutua. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Coltrane, S. 2004. Families and society: Classic and contemporary readings . Belmont, CA: Thomson/ Wadsworth.
Google Scholar
Connell, R.W. 1995. Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Connell, R.W. , and M. Messerschmidt . 2005. Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society 19:829-59.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Cooper, M. 2000. Being the go-to guy: Fatherhood, masculinity, and the organization of work in Silicon Valley. Qualitative Sociology 23:397-402.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Correll, S. , S. Bernard , and I. Paik. 2007. Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology 112:1297-1338.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Correll, S. , and C. Ridgeway. 2003. Expectation states theory. In Handbook for social psychology, edited by John Delamater. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
Google Scholar
England, P. 1992. Comparable worth: Theories and evidence. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Google Scholar
England, P. , and Michelle J. Budig . 1998. Gary Becker on the family: His genius, impact, and blind spots. In Required reading: Sociology’s most influential books, edited by Dan Clawson. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Google Scholar
Glauber, R. 2008. Race and gender in families and at work: The fatherhood premium. Gender & Society 22:8-30.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hamilton, L. 2006. Statistics with Stata. Belmont, CA : Thomson Brooks/Cole.
Google Scholar
Hersch, J. , and L. Stratton. 2000. Household specialization and the male marriage wage premium. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 54:78-94.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hughes, M. 2000. Early fatherhood: Social determinants and life course consequences. Dissertation Abstracts International 60:4611-4861.
Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. , and K. Gerson. 2004. The time divide. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Kanter, R.M. 1979. Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Kaufman, G. , and P. Uhlenberg. 2000. The influence of parenthood on the work effort of married men and women. Social Forces 78:931-49.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Knoester, C. , and D. Eggebeen. 2006. The effects of the transition to parenthood and subsequent children on men’s well-being and social participation . Journal of Family Issues 27:1532-60.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Korenman, S. , and D. Neumark. 1991. Does marriage really make men more productive ? Journal of Human Resources 26:282-301.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lundberg, S. , and E. Rose. 2000. Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women. Labour Economics 7:689-710.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lundberg, S. , and E. Rose. 2002. The effects of sons and daughters on men’s labor supply and wages. Review of Economics and Statistics 84:251-68.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Marsiglio, W. , P. Amato , R. Day , and M. Lamb. 2000. Scholarship on fatherhood in the 1990s and beyond. Journal of Marriage and Family 62:1173-91.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Meyer, P. , and A. Osborne. 2005. Proposed category system for 1960-2000 Census occupations. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Office of Productivity and Technology, Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
Millimet, D. 2000. The impact of children on wages, job tenure, and the division of household labor. Economic Journal 110:139-57.
Google Scholar | Crossref
National Center for Health Statistics. 2006 . Fertility, contraception, and fatherhood: Data on men and women from Cycle 6 (2002) of the National Survey of Family Growth. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Center for Disease Control and Prevention Vital and Health Statistics 26:1-159.
Google Scholar
Nock, S. 1998. The consequences of premarital fatherhood. American Sociological Review 60:250-63.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Pager, D. 2003. The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology 108:937-75.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Percheski, C. , and C. Wildeman. 2008. Becoming a dad: Employment trajectories of married, cohabiting, and nonresident fathers. Social Science Quarterly 89:482-501.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Presser, H. 1994. Employment schedules among dual-earning spouses and the division of household labor by gender. American Sociological Review 59:348-64.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ridgeway, C. , and S. Correll. 2004. Motherhood as a status characteristic . Journal of Social Issues 60:683-700.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Smith, A. 2006. Pre-fatherhood, fatherhood, and earnings: The price of parenthood. PhD diss., Department of Social Policy, University of Edinburgh.
Google Scholar
South, S. , and G. Spitze. 1994. Housework in marital and nonmarital households. American Sociological Review 59:327-47.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tomaskovic-Devey, D. , and S. Skaggs. 1999. An establishment-level test of the statistical discrimination hypothesis. Work and Occupations 26:422-45.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Townsend, N. 2002. The packaged deal: Marriage, work, and fatherhood in men’s lives. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar
Treiman, D. 2009. Quantitative data analysis. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
Google Scholar
Williams, C. 1995. Still a man’s world. Berkeley : University of California Press.
Google Scholar

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Access

    does not have access to this content.

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

GAS-article-ppv for GBP29.00
GAS-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP199.35
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $241.11

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top