Political actors increasingly use the microblogging service, Twitter, for the organization, coordination, and documentation of collective action. These interactions with Twitter leave digital artifacts that can be analyzed. In this article, we look at Twitter messages commenting on one of the most contentious protests in Germany’s recent history, the protests against the infrastructure project Stuttgart 21. We analyze all messages containing the hashtag #s21 that were posted between May 25, 2010, and November 14, 2010, by the 80,000 most followed Twitter users in Germany. We do this to answer three questions: First, what distinguishes events that resulted in high activity on Twitter from events that did not? Second, during times of high activity, does the behavior of Twitter users vary from their usual behavior patterns? Third, were the artifacts (retweets, links) that dominated conversations during times of high activity indicative of tactical support of the protests or of symbolic association with it?

Atton, C. (2002). Alternative media. London, England: Sage.
Google Scholar
Bastos, M. T., Raimundo, R. L. G., Travitzki, R. (2013). Gatekeeping Twitter: Message diffusion in political hashtags. Media, Culture & Society, 35, 260270.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bennett, W. L. (2012). The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 664, 2039.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A. (2011). Digital media and the personalization of collective action. Information, Communication & Society, 14, 770799.
Google Scholar | ISI
Bennett, W. L., Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 739768.
Google Scholar | ISI
Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., Stohl, C. (2005). Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory, 15, 365388.
Google Scholar | ISI
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A. J., Stohl, C. (2012). Collective action in organizations: Interaction and engagement in an era of technological change. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Bruns, A. (2005). Gatewatching: Collaborative online news production. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing.
Google Scholar
Bruns, A., Stieglitz, S. (2012). Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on Twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30, 160185.
Google Scholar
Bruns, A., Stieglitz, S. (2013). Towards more systematic Twitter analysis: Metrics for tweeting activities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 16, 91108.
Google Scholar | ISI
Chadwick, A. (2013). The hybrid media system: Politics and power. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Couldry, N., Curran, J. (Eds.). (2003). Contesting media power: Alternative media in a networked world. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Couldry, N., Hepp, A., Krotz, F. (Eds.). (2010). Media events in a global age. Oxon, England: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Dayan, D., Katz, E. (1992). Media events: The live broadcasting of history. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Donsbach, W. (1991). Medienwirkung trotz Selektion: Einflussfaktoren auf die Zuwendung zu Zeitungsinhalten [Media effects in spite of selectivity: Influencing factors on the selection of newspaper content]. Köln, Germany: Böhlau.
Google Scholar
Earl, J., Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the Internet age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Eilders, C. (1997). Nachrichtenfaktoren und Rezeption: Eine empirische Analyse zur Auswahl und Verarbeitung politischer Informationen [News values and reception: An empirical analysis of the selection and processing of political information]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Google Scholar
Eilders, C., Wirth, W. (1999). Die Nachrichtenwertforschung auf dem Weg zum Publikum: Eine experimentelle überprüfung des Einflusses von Nachrichtenfaktoren bei der Rezeption [News value research on its way to the audience: An experimental examination of the influence of news values on reception]. Publizistik, 44, 3557.
Google Scholar
Gabriel, O. W., Schoen, H., Faden-Kuhne, K. (2013). Die Volksabstimmung über “Stuttgart 21”. [The plebiscite on “Stuttgart 21”]. Leverkusen, Germany: Opladen Budrich.
Google Scholar
Gerbaudo, P. (2012). Tweets and the streets: Social media and contemporary activism. London, England: Pluto Press.
Google Scholar
González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Moreno, Y. (2013). Broadcasters and hidden influentials in online protest diffusion. American Behavioural Scientist , 57, 943–965.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
González-Bailón, S., Borge-Holthoefer, J., Rivero, A., Moreno, Y. (2011). The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Scientific Reports, 1. Retrieved March 31, 2013, from http://www.nature.com/srep/2011/111215/srep00197/full/srep00197.html
Google Scholar
Green, J. E. (2010). The eyes of the people: Democracy in an age of spectatorship. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Howard, P. N., Hussain, M. M. (2011). The role of digital media. Journal of Democracy, 22, 3548.
Google Scholar | ISI
Howard, P. N., Hussain, M. M. (2013). Democracy’s fourth wave? Digital media and the Arab Spring. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Jungherr, A., Jürgens, P. (2013a). Forecasting the pulse: How deviations from regular patterns in online data can identify offline phenomena. Internet Research. (Forthcoming).
Google Scholar | ISI
Jungherr, A., Jürgens, P. (2013b). Stuttgart’s black Thursday on Twitter: Mapping political protests with social media data. In Gibson, R., Cantijoch, M., Ward, S. (Eds.), Analyzing social media data and web networks: New methods for political science. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Jungherr, A., Schoen, H. (2013). Das Internet in Wahlkämpfen: Konzepte, Wirkungen und Kampagnenfunktionen [The Internet in election campaigns: Concepts, effects and functions for a campaign]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
Google Scholar
Jürgens, P. (2010). Stell’ Dir vor du twitterst und keiner hört zu. Themen und Öffentlichkeit auf Twitter [Imagine you tweet and nobody is listening: Topics and publics on Twitter] (Unpublished master’s thesis). Institut für Publizistik, University of Mainz, Mainz.
Google Scholar
Kreiss, D., Meadows, L., Remensperger, J. (2013). Political performance and active spectatorship: Symbolically organizing the polity during the 2012 Democratic national convention. Paper presented at the International Communication Association annual conference. International Communication Association, London, England.
Google Scholar
Kuhn, J. (2010). Live aus der Baumkrone [Live from the tree top]. Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved March 31, 2013, from http://www.sueddeutsche.de/digital/stuttgart-protestvideos-im-netz-live-aus-der-baumkrone-1.1007082
Google Scholar
Lin, Y.-R., Keegan, B., Margolin, D., Lazer, D. (2013). Rising tides or rising stars?: Dynamics of shared attention on Twitter during media events. arXiv 1307.2785. Retrieved March 31, 2013, from http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.2785
Google Scholar
Lotan, G., Graeff, E., Ananny, M., Gaffney, D., Pearce, I., Boyd, D. (2011). The revolutions were tweeted: Information flows during the 2011 Tunesian and Egyptian revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5. Retrieved March 31, 2013, from http://ijoc.org/ojs/index.php/ijoc/article/view/1246
Google Scholar
Mader, F. (2010). Schwabenstreich im Netz [Swabian tricks online]. Süddeutsche Zeitung. Retrieved March 31, 2013, from http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/protest-gegen-stuttgart-schwabenstreich-im-netz-1.998202
Google Scholar
Meraz, S., Papacharissi, Z. A. (2012). Broadcasting and listening practices on #Egypt: Networked framing and networked gatekeeping on Twitter. Paper presented at the International Association for Media and Communication Research, Durban, South Africa.
Google Scholar
Papacharissi, Z. A., de Fatima, M. (2012). Affective news and networked publics: The rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, 62, 266282.
Google Scholar | ISI
Poell, T., Borra, E. (2013). Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Journalism, 14, 695713.
Google Scholar
R Core Team . (2012). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved March 31, 2013, from http://www.R-project.org
Google Scholar
Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Ruhrmann, G., Woelke, J., Maier, M., Diehlmann, N. (2003). Der Wert von Nachrichten im deutschen Fernsehen: Ein Modell zur Validierung von Nachrichtenfaktoren [The value of news in German TV: A model for the validation of news values]. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
Google Scholar
Schulz, W. (1976). Die Konstruktion von Realität in den Nachrichtenmedien [The construction of reality in the news media]. Freiburg, Germany: Karl Alber.
Google Scholar
Segerberg, A., Bennett, W. L. (2011). Social media and the organization of collective action: Using Twitter to explore the ecologies of two climate change protests. The Communication Review, 14, 197215.
Google Scholar
Tufekci, Z., Wilson, C. (2012). Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: Observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, 62, 363379.
Google Scholar | ISI
Verma, S., Vieweg, S., Corvey, W. J., Palen, L., Martin, J. H., Palmer, M., Schram, A., Anderson, K. M. (2011). Natural language processing to the rescue? Extracting “situational awareness” tweets during mass emergency. In Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (pp. 385392). Menlo Park, CA: The AAAI Press.
Google Scholar
Wickham, H. (2009). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. New York, NY: Springer.
Google Scholar
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here.

Your Access Options


Purchase

SSC-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $372.66

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top