Research on Technological Innovation in Family Firms: Present Debates and Future Directions

First Published November 9, 2012 Research Article

Authors

1
 
University of Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
by this author
, 2
 
Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
by this author
, 3
 
University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
by this author
First Published Online: November 9, 2012

The purpose of this article is to review and systematize prior work on technological innovation in family firms and to open up an agenda to guide future research into this promising area. The study shows that family involvement has direct effects on innovation inputs (e.g., R&D expenditures), activities (e.g., leadership in new product development projects), and outputs (e.g., number of new products), as well as moderating effects on the relationships between these steps of technological innovation. The article uses theories applied in family business research (e.g., agency theory) to discuss opportunities for extending technological innovation frameworks by considering family involvement.

Adler, P. S., Kwon, S. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Almirall, E., Casadesus-Masanell, R. (2010). Open versus closed innovation: A model of discovery and divergence. Academy of Management Review, 35(1), 27-47.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Antoncic, B., Hisrich, R. D. (2001). Intrapreneurship: Construct refinement and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 495-527.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Asplund, M., Sandin, R. (1999). The survival of new products. Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 219-237.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bammens, Y., Van Gils, A., Voordeckers, W. (2010). The role of family involvement in fostering an innovation-supportive stewardship culture. In Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings. Retrieved from http://doclib.uhasselt.be/dspace/bitstream/1942/11754/2/13982_AOMBestPaperProceedings.pdf
Google Scholar
Bergfeld, M.-M. H., Weber, F.-M. (2011). Dynasties of innovation: Highly performing German family firms and the owners’ role for innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 13(1), 80-94.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Block, J. H. (2009). Long-term orientation of family firms. An investigation of R&D investments, downsizing practices, and executive pay. Wiesbaden, Germany: Gabler.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Block, J. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 248-265.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Blundell, R., Griffiths, R., Van Reenen, J. (1999). Market share, market value and innovation in a panel of British manufacturing firms. Review of Economic studies, 66, 529-554.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249-265.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Carney, M., Gedajlovic, E. (2002). The coupling of ownership and control and the allocation of financial resources: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 123-146.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cassia, L., De Massis, A., Pizzurno, E. (2011). An exploratory investigation on NPD in small family businesses from Northern Italy. International Journal of Business, Management and Social Sciences, 2(2), 1-14.
Google Scholar
Cassia, L., De Massis, A., Pizzurno, E. (2012). Strategic innovation and new product development in family firms: An empirically grounded theoretical framework. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 18, 198-232.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Chen, H. L., Hsu, W. T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22, 347-362.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Google Scholar
Chiesa, V. (2001). R&D strategy and organization: Managing technical change in dynamic contexts. London, England: Imperial College Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Chin, C. L., Chen, Y. J., Kleinman, G., Lee, P. (2009). Corporate ownership structure and innovation: Evidence from Taiwan’s electronics industry. Journal of Accounting Auditing Finance, 24(1), 145-175.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Chirico, F., Sirmon, D., Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P. (2011). Resource orchestration in family firms: Investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement, and participative strategy affect performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 307-326.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Chrisman, J. J., Patel, P. J. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of management Journal, 55, 976-997.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Google Scholar
Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19-39.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Churchill, N. C., Hatten, K. J. (1997). Non-market-based transfers of wealth and power: A research framework for family business. Family Business Review, 10, 53-67.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Classen, N., Carree, M., Van Gils, A., Peters, B. (2011). The role of family ownership in research, innovation and productivity of SMEs: A stepwise econometric analysis. Paper presented at the IFERA 11th Annual World Family Business Research Conference, Palermo, Italy.
Google Scholar
Classen, N., Van Gils, A., Bammens, Y., Carree, M. (2012). Accessing resources from innovation partners: The search breadth of family SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 50, 191-215.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cooper, R. G., Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1987). New products: What separates winners from losers? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 169-184.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Craig, J. B. L., Dibrell, C. (2006). The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study. Family Business Review, 19, 275-288.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Craig, J. B. L., Moores, K. (2006). A 10 year longitudinal investigation of strategy, systems, and environment on innovation in family firms. Family Business Review, 19, 1-10.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Crossan, M. M., Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1154-1191.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Czarnitzki, D., Kraft, K. (2009). Capital control, debt financing and innovative activity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 71, 372-383.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cyert, R. M., March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory ofthe firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
Dahlander, L., Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation? Research Policy, 39, 699-709.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
De Massis, A. (2012). Family Involvement and Procedural Justice Climate among Non-Family Managers: The Effects of Affect, Social Identities, Trust and Risk of Non-Reciprocity. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 36(6), 1227-1234.
Google Scholar | Crossref
De Massis, A., Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J. (2008). Factors preventing intra-family succession. Family Business Review, 21, 183-199.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Nordqvist, M., Chrisman, J. J. (2012). Critical success factors for product innovation in family business: A multiple case-study. Paper presented at the IFERA 11th Annual World Family Business Research Conference, Bordeaux, France.
Google Scholar
De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Pizzurno, E., Cassia, L. (2013). Product innovation in family vs. non-family firms: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Small Business Management.
Google Scholar
De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Cassia, L. (in press). How do entrepreneurs of family firms perceive their competitive advantages and disadvantages compared to non-family companies? Empirical evidence from the transportation industry. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 51(1).
Google Scholar
De Massis, Kotlar, J., Chua, J.H., Chrisman, J.J. (in press). Ability and Willingness as Sufficiency Conditions for Family-Oriented Particularistic Behavior: Implications for Theory and Empirical Studies. Journal of Small Business Management.
Google Scholar
De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Frattini, F. (in press). Is social capital perceived as a source of competitive advantage or disadvantage for family firms? An exploratory analysis of CEO perceptions. Journal of Entrepreneurship, 22(1).
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
De Massis, A., Sharma, P. A., Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J. (2012). Family business studies: An annotated bibliography. Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Google Scholar
Dunn, B. (1996). Family enterprises in the UK: A special sector? Family Business Review, 9, 139-155.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Durand, R., Vargas, V. (2003). Ownership, organization, and private firms’ efficient use of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 667-675.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Dyer, W. G. (2003). The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 401-416.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Dyer, W. G., Dyer, W. J. (2009). Putting the family into family business research. Family Business Review, 22, 216-219.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Earley, P. C. (1989). Social loafing and collectivism: A comparison of the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 565-581.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14, 532-550.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ernst, H. (2002). Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(1), 1-40.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Furrer, O., Thomas, H., Goussevskaia, A. (2008). The structure and evolution of the strategic management field: A content analysis of 26 years of strategic management research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 1-23.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Freeman, C. (1976). Economics of industrial innovation. London, England: Pinter.
Google Scholar
García-Álvarez, E., López-Sintas, J. (2001). A taxonomy of founders based on values: The root of family business heterogeneity. Family Business Review, 14, 209-230.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Gedajlovic, E., Cao, Q., Zhang, H. (2012). Corporate shareholdings and organizational ambidexterity in high-tech SMEs: Evidence from a transitional economy. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 652-665.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M. (2010). Markets, hierarchies, and families: Toward a transaction cost theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 1145-1172.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gedajlovic, E., Lubatkin, M. H., Schulze, W. S. (2004). Crossing the threshold from founder management to professional management: A governance perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 41, 899-912.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Geroski, P., Machin, S., Van Reenen, J. (1993). The profitability of innovating firms. RAND Journal of Economics, 24, 198-211.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gersick, K. E., Davis, J. A., Hampton, M. M., Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annals, 5, 653-707.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J. L., Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106-137.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Nunez-Nickel, M., Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of management Journal, 44(1), 81-95.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gudmundson, D., Hartman, E. A., Tower, C. B. (1999). Strategic orientation: Differences between family and nonfamily firms. Family Business Review, 12, 27-39.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Gudmundson, D., Tower, C. B., Hartman, E. A. (2003). Innovation in small businesses: Culture and ownership structure do matter. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 8(1), 1-18.
Google Scholar
Habbershon, T. G., Williams, M. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 9, 157-170.
Google Scholar
Harris, D., Martinez, J. L., Ward, J. L. (1994). Is strategy different for the family-owned businesses? Family Business Review, 7, 159-176.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hatch, N. W., Dyer, J. H. (2004). Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 25, 1155-1178.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Helfat, C. E. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: Understanding strategic change in organizations. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Horton, T. (1986). Managing in a family way. Management Review, 75(2), 3.
Google Scholar
Hoskisson, R. E., Hitt, M. A., Johnson, R. A., Grossman, W. (2002). Conflicting voices: The effects of institutional ownership heterogeneity and internal governance on corporate innovation strategies. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 697-716.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hoy, F., Sharma, P. (2010). Entrepreneurial family firms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Hsu, L. C., Chang, H. C. (2011). The role of behavioral strategic controls in family firm innovation. Industry and Innovation, 18, 709-727.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jensen, M. C., Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kochhar, R., David, P. (1996). Institutional investors and firm innovation: a test of competing hypotheses. Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 73-84.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Bianchi, M., Fang, H. (2012). Technology acquisition in family-controlled firms: A longitudinal analysis of Spanish manufacturing firms. Paper presented at the 19th International Product Development Management Conference, Manchester, England.
Google Scholar
Klein, S. B., Astrachan, J. H., Smyrnios, K. X. (2005). The F PEC Scale of Family Influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 321-339.
Google Scholar | Crossref
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54, 471-517.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Le Breton-Miller, I. L., Miller, D. (2006). Why do some family businesses out compete? governance, long term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 731-746.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 822-846.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lichtenthaler, U., Muethel, M. (2012). The impact of family involvement on dynamic innovation capabilities: Evidence from German manufacturing firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 36(6). Advance online publication. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00548.x
Google Scholar | Crossref
Llach, J., Nordqvist, M. (2010). Innovation in family and non-family businesses: A resource perspective. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 2, 381-399.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lumpkin, G. T., Steier, L., Wright, M. (2011). Strategic entrepreneurship in family business. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5, 285-306.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McKelvie, A., McKenny, A. F., Lumpkin, G. T., Short, J. C. (2013). Corporate entrepreneurship in family business: Past contributions and future opportunities. In Melin, L., Nordqvist, M., Sharma, P. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of family business studies. New York, NY: Sage.
Google Scholar
McCann, J. E., Leon Guerrero, A. Y., Haley, J. D. (2001). Strategic goals and practices of innovative family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 39(1), 50-59.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I. (2005). Managing for the long run. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Google Scholar
Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. stagnation: An empirical comparison of small family and non-family businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51-78.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Munari, F., Oriani, R., Sobrero, M. (2010). The effects of owner identity and external governance systems on R&D investments: A study of Western European firms. Research Policy, 39, 1093-1104.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Muñoz-Bullón, F., Sanchez-Bueno, M. J. (2011). The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Family Business Review, 24, 62-70.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Nohria, N., Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1245-1264.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Nordqvist, M., Melin, L. (2010). Entrepreneurial families and family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22, 211-239.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ordanini, A., Rubera, G., DeFillippi, R. (2008). The many moods of inter-organizational imitation: A critical review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 375-398.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Pittino, D., Visintin, F. (2009). Innovation and strategic types of family SMEs. A test and extension of Miles and Snow’s configurational model. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 17, 257-295.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Bachrach, D., Podsakoff, N. (2005). The influence of management journals in the 1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 473-488.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. London, England: Macmillan.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Reuber, A. R. (2010). Strengthening your literature review. Family Business Review, 23, 105-108.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Rothaermel, F. T., Hess, A. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18, 898-921.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sacristán-Navarro, M., Gómez-Ansón, S., Cabeza-García, L. (2011). Family ownership and control, the presence of other large shareholders, and firm performance: Further evidence. Family Business Review, 24, 71-93.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H. (1996). A review and annotated bibliography of family business studies. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., Gersick, K. E. (2012). 25 years of family business review: Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future. Family Business Review, 25, 5-15.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sharma, P., Nordqvist, M. (2008). A classification scheme for family firms: From family values to effective governance to firm performance. In Tapies, J., Ward, J. L. (Eds.), Family values and value creation: How do family-owned businesses foster enduring values (pp. 71-101). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sharma, P., Salvato, C. (2011). Commentary: Exploiting and exploring new opportunities over life cycle stages of family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35 1199-1205.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sirmon, D. G., Arregle, J., Hitt, M. A., Webb, J. W. (2008). The role of family influence in firms’ strategic responses to threat of imitation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 979-998.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339-358.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review, 32, 273-292.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Steijvers, T., Voordeckers, W. (2009). Private family ownership and the agency costs of debt. Family Business Review, 22, 333-346.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Tagiuri, R., Davis, J. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9, 199-208.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 1319-1350.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Thieme, J. (2007). Perspective: The world’s top innovation management scholars and their social capital. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 214-229.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Thomsen, S., Pedersen, T. (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 689-705.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tidd, J., Bessant, J. R. (2009). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Google Scholar
Tidd, J., Bessant, J. R., Pavitt, K. (2005). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Google Scholar
Ulrich, K. T., Eppinger, S. D. (2011). Product design and development. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Van De Vrande, V., Vanhaverbeke, W., Duysters, G. (2009). External technology sourcing: The effect of uncertainty on governance mode choice. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(1), 62-80.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.
Google Scholar
Villalonga, B., Amit, R. (2009). How are US family firms controlled? Review of Financial Studies, 22, 3047-3091.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wagner, M. (2010). Corporate social performance and innovation with high social benefits: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 581-594.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Westhead, P. (1997). Ambitions, external environment and strategic factor differences between family and non-family companies. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 9, 127-158.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Westhead, P., Howorth, C. (2007). “Types” of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19, 405-431.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wu, Z., Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J. (2007). Effects of family ownership and management on small business equity financing. Journal of Business Venturing, 22, 875-895.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Yin, R. K. (2003). Applications of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Zellweger, T. (2007). Time horizon, costs of equity capital, and generic investment strategies of firms. Family Business Review, 20, 1-15.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Zellweger, T., Nason, R., Nordqvist, M. (2012). From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families: Introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review, 25, 136-155.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP147.15
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $179.66
FBR-article-ppv for GBP29.00
FBR-article-ppv for $37.50

Article available in:

Related Articles