Social Innovation in Disability Nonprofits: An Abductive Study of Capabilities for Social Change

First Published September 11, 2019 Research Article

Authors

1
 
Federation University Australia, Ballarat, Australia

by this author
, 23
 
Mahidol University, Salaya, Thailand
 
University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, Australia
by this author
, 34
 
University of Tasmania, Sandy Bay, Australia
 
United Nations University—Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
by this author
First Published Online: September 11, 2019

This study uses an abduction-based approach to identify the capabilities harnessed by nonprofit organizations (NPOs) as they develop social innovations. The context of this study is the Australian disability sector currently undergoing a once-in-a-generation social policy reform with the implementation of the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Data from extensive field observation and 52 interviews were collected during “researcher-in-residences” at two disability NPOs and analyzed using thematic coding and practice–theory iteration to arrive at a “working” hypothesis. The findings reveal many capabilities used by disability NPOs on the path to social innovation development. The complex interplay of these capabilities forms five pivotal capabilities (i.e., transformational empathy, place-based relationing, diversity learning, paradoxical change making, and complexity leadership) for eliciting nonprofit social innovation (NSI) with community and system-level impacts.

Agar, M. (2010). On the ethnographic part of the mix: A multi-genre tale of the field. Organizational Research Methods, 13, 286-303.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Ashby, R. (1962). Principles of the self-organizing system. In von Foerster, H., Zopf, G. W., Jr., (Eds.), Principles of self-organization (pp. 255-278). New York, NY: Pergamon Press.
Google Scholar
Ayob, N., Teasdale, S., Fagan, K. (2016). How social innovation “came to be”: Tracing the evolution of a contested concept. Journal of Social Policy, 45, 635-653.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Benner, M. J., Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28, 238-256.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bigby, C., Wiesel, I. (2015). Mediating community participation: Practice of support workers in initiating, facilitating or disrupting encounters between people with and without intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 28, 307-318.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Burnes, B. (2005). Complexity theories and organizational change. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7, 73-90.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (2006). Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Clement, T., Bigby, C. (2009). Breaking out of a distinct social space: Reflections on supporting community participation for people with severe and profound intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22, 264-275.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Connellan, J. (2014). Big disruptive and here to stay: The impact of the National Disability Insurance Scheme on not for profit housing and homelessness agencies. Parity, 27(5), 23-24.
Google Scholar
Davies, A., Mulgan, G., Norman, W., Pulford, L., Patrick, R., Simon, J. (2012). Systemic innovation. Social Innovation Europe. Retrieved from https://www.siceurope.eu/sites/default/files/field/attachment/SIE%20Systemic%20Innovation%20Report%20-%20December%202012_1.pdf
Google Scholar
Department of Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs . (2011). 2010-2020 National disability strategy. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia. Retrieved from https://www.dss.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/05_2012/national_disability_strategy_2010_2020_easy_english.pdf
Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P., Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Goldstein, J., Hazy, J. K., Silberstang, J. (2010). A complexity science model of social innovation in social enterprise. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1, 101-125.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Green, J., Mears, J. (2014). The implementation of the NDIS: Who wins, who loses? Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6(2), 25-39.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Griggs, J., Whitworth, A., Walker, R., McLennan, D., Noble, M. (2008). Person- or place-based policies to tackle disadvantage? York, UK: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Google Scholar
Hall, J., Vredenburg, H. (2003). The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45, 61-68.
Google Scholar | ISI
Howaldt, J., Schwarz, M. (2017). Social innovation and human development: How the capabilities approach and social innovation theory mutually support each other. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18, 163-180.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Keith, L. (2000). Take up thy bed and walk: Death, disability and cure in classic fiction for girls. London, England: The Women’s Press.
Google Scholar
Khachab, C. E. (2013). The logical goodness of abduction in C. S. Peirce’s thought. The Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 49, 157-177.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kovács, G., Spens, K. (2005). Abductive reasoning in logistics research. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 35, 132-144.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kraft, M. E., Furlong, S. R. (2013). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives (4th ed.). London, England: Sage.
Google Scholar
Lettice, F., Parekh, M. (2010). The social innovation process: Themes, challenges and implications for practice. International Journal of Technology Management, 51, 139-158.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mahoney, J., Thelen, K. (2009). Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Marsh, I., Crowley, K., Grube, D., Eccleston, R. (2017). Delivering public services: Locality, learning and reciprocity in place based practice. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 76, 443-456.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Morris, J. (2001). Impairment and disability: Constructing an ethics of care that promotes human rights. Hypatia, 16(4), 1-16.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42, 1969-1990.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Newth, J. (2018). “Hands-on” versus “arms-length” entrepreneurship research: Using ethnography to contextualize social innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 24, 683-696.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Patokorpi, E., Ahvenainen, M. (2009). Developing an abduction-based method for futures research. Futures, 41, 126-139.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Peirce, C. S. (1960). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1934)
Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1955). Philosophical writings of Peirce. New York, NY: Dover.
Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Phills, J., Deiglmeier, K., Miller, D. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34-43.
Google Scholar
Productivity Commission . (2011, July 31). Disability care and support: Productivity Commission inquiry report (Vol. 1). Retrieved from https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/disability-support/report/disability-support-volume1.pdf
Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68-78.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Sousa, M., van Dierendonck, D. (2017). Servant leadership and the effect of the interaction between humility, action, and hierarchical power on follower engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 13-25.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stainton, T. (2017). Moving towards full citizenship and inclusion for people with intellectual disabilities. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 4(1), 1-3.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Svennevig, J. (2001). Abduction as a methodological approach to the study of spoken interaction. Norskrift, 103, 1-22.
Google Scholar
Svensson, P., Bengtsson, L. (2010). Users’ influence in social-service innovations: Two Swedish case studies. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1, 190-212.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Taylor, R., Torugsa, N., Arundel, A. (2018a). Leaping into real-world relevance: An “abduction” process for nonprofit research. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47, 206-227.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Taylor, R., Torugsa, N., Arundel, A. (2018b). Thriving within the turbulence: A complexity theorizing approach to social innovation by nonprofit organizations. In Dogru, C. (Ed.), Handbook of research on contemporary approaches in management and organizational strategy. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
Google Scholar
Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298-318.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15, 398-405.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Van de Ven, A. H. (2015). Welcome to the Academy of Management Discoveries (AMD). Academy of Management Discoveries, 1(1), 1-4.
Google Scholar | Crossref
von Hippel, E . (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32, 791-805.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Weerawardena, J., Mort, G. S. (2012). Competitive strategy in socially entrepreneurial nonprofit organizations: Innovation and differentiation. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 31, 91-101.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

NVS-article-ppv for GBP29.00
NVS-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP188.14
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $227.55