![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
An influential explanation for gender differences in mating strategies is that the sex-specific reproductive constraints faced by human ancestors shaped these differences. Other theorists have emphasized the role of societal factors, hypothesizing, for example, that gender differences in mate preferences should wane in gender-equal societies. However, findings have been ambiguous. Using recent data and a novel measure of gender equality, we revisited the role of gender parity in gender differentiation for mate preferences. In the first study, 3,177 participants from 10 nations with a gradually decreasing Global Gender Gap Index (GGI) provided online ratings of the desirability of mate attributes with reportedly evolutionary origins. In the second study, GGI scores were related to gender differences in mate preferences previously reported for 8,953 participants from 31 nations (Buss, 1989). Both studies show that gender differences in mate preferences with presumed evolutionary roots decline proportionally to increases in nations’ gender parity.
References
|
Archer, J. (1996). Sex differences in social behavior: Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51, 909–917. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Barreto, H., Howland, F. M. (2005). Introductory econometrics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Birnbaum, M. H. (2004). Human research and data collection via the internet. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 803–832. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Braver, S. L., MacKinnon, D. P., Page, M. C. (2003). Levine’s guide to SPSS for analysis of variance (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Brown, G. R., Dickins, T. E., Sear, R., Laland, K. N. (2011). Evolutionary accounts of human behavioural diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366, 313–324. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioural & Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Buss, D. M. (2011). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (4th ed.). London, England: Allyn & Bacon. Google Scholar | |
|
Buss, D. M., Abbott, M., Angleitner, A., Biaggio, A., Blanco-Villasenor, A., Bruchon-Schweitzer, M., . . . Yang, K.-S. (1990). International preferences in selecting mates: A study of 37 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 5–47. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Buss, D. M., Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary theory on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Del Giudice, M., Booth, T., Irwing, P. (2012). The distance between Mars and Venus: Measuring global sex differences in personality. PLoS One, 7, 1. Retrieved from http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029265 Google Scholar | |
|
Eagly, A. H., Eastwick, P. W., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. (2009). Possible selves in marital roles: The impact of the anticipated division of labor on the mate preferences of women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35, 403–414. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behaviour: Evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist, 54, 408–423. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Eastwick, P. W., Eagly, A. H., Glick, P., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C., Fiske, S. T., Blum, A. M. B., . . . Volpato, C. (2006). Is traditional gender ideology associated with sex-typed mate preferences? A test in nine nations. Sex Roles, 54, 603–614. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., Eagly, A. H. (2011). When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1012–1032. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences—A test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 125–139. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M. (2006). Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: Evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 75–95. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59, 93–104. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Grimes, D. A., Schulz, K. F. (2002). Bias and causal association in observational research. Lancet, 359, 248–252. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Hausmann, R., Tyson, L. D., Zahidi, S. (2010). The global gender gap report 2010. Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum. Google Scholar | |
|
Haynes, S. N., O’Brien, W. H. (2000). Principles and practice of behavioral assessment. New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hoffman, M., Gneezy, U., List, J. A. (2011). Nurture affects gender differences in spatial abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 108, 14786–14788. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Hyde, J. S., Mertz, J. E. (2009). Gender, culture, and mathematics performance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 8801–8807. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Jütting, J. P., Morrisson, C., Dayton-Johnson, J., Drechsler, D. (2008). Measuring gender (in)equality: The OECD gender, institutions, and development data base. Journal of Human Development, 9, 65–89. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kasser, T., Sharma, Y. S. (1999). Reproductive freedom, educational equality, and females’ preference for resource-acquisition characteristics of males. Psychological Science, 10, 374–377. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Klasen, S. (2006). UNDP’s gender-related measures: Some conceptual problems and possible solutions. Journal of Human Development, 7, 243–274. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Li, N. P., Kenrick, D. T., Bailey, M. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Moore, F. R., Cassidy, C. (2007). Female status predicts female mate preferences across nonindustrial societies. Cross-Cultural Research, 41, 66–74. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Moore, F. R., Cassidy, C., Law Smith, M. J., Perrett, D. I. (2006). The effects of female control of resources on sex differentiated mate preferences. Evolution & Human Behavior, 27, 193– 205. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., . . . Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 10593–10597. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Skitka, L. J., Sargis, E. G. (2006). The internet as psychological laboratory. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 529–555. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Sweeney, M., Cancian, M. (2004). The changing importance of White women’s economic prospects for assortative mating. Journal of Marriage and Family, 66, 1015–1028. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Campbell, B. (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). Chicago, IL: Aldine. Google Scholar | |
|
Waynforth, D., Dunbar, R. I. M. (1995). Conditional mate choice strategies in humans: Evidence from ‘Lonely Hearts’ advertisements. Behaviour, 132, 755–779. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Wood, W., Eagly, A. H. (2002). A cross-cultural analysis of the behaviour of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 699–727. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Zentner, M. (2005). Ideal mate personality concepts and compatibility in close relationships: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 242–256. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Zentner, M., Eerola, T. (2010). Rhythmic engagement with music in infancy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 107, 5568–5573. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Zentner, M., Renaud, O. (2007). Origins of adolescents’ ideal self: An intergenerational perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 557–574. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Zentner, M., Shiner, R. (2012). Fifty years of progress in temperament research: A synthesis of major themes, findings, challenges, and a look forward. In Zentner, M., Shiner, R. (Eds.), The handbook of temperament (pp. 673–700). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Zietsch, B., Verweij, K., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. (2011). Variation in human mate choice: Simultaneously investigating heritability, parental influence, sexual imprinting and assortative mating. American Naturalist, 177, 605–616. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
