![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Order and disorder are prevalent in both nature and culture, which suggests that each environ confers advantages for different outcomes. Three experiments tested the novel hypotheses that orderly environments lead people toward tradition and convention, whereas disorderly environments encourage breaking with tradition and convention—and that both settings can alter preferences, choice, and behavior. Experiment 1 showed that relative to participants in a disorderly room, participants in an orderly room chose healthier snacks and donated more money. Experiment 2 showed that participants in a disorderly room were more creative than participants in an orderly room. Experiment 3 showed a predicted crossover effect: Participants in an orderly room preferred an option labeled as classic, but those in a disorderly room preferred an option labeled as new. Whereas prior research on physical settings has shown that orderly settings encourage better behavior than disorderly ones, the current research tells a nuanced story of how different environments suit different outcomes.
References
|
Abrahamson, E., Freedman, D. H. (2007). A perfect mess: The hidden benefits of disorder. New York, NY: Little, Brown. Google Scholar | |
|
Baumeister, R. F. (2005). The cultural animal: Human nature, meaning, and social life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Dollinger, S. J. (2007). Creativity and conservatism. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 1025–1035. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. London, England: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Eidelman, S., Crandall, C. S., Pattershall, J. (2009). The existence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 765–775. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Feather, N. T. (1971). Organization and discrepancy in cognitive structures. Psychological Review, 78, 355–379. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fennis, B. M., Janssen, L., Vohs, K. D. (2009). Acts of benevolence: A limited-resource account of compliance with charitable requests. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 906–924. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Friedman, R., Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001–1013. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar | |
|
Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Keizer, K., Lindenberg, S., Steg, L. (2008). The spreading of disorder. Science, 322, 1681–1685. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Koole, S. L., Van den Berg, A. E. (2005). Lost in the wilderness: Terror management, action orientation, and nature evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 1014–1028. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Liljenquist, K., Zhong, C.-B., Galinsky, A. D. (2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21, 381–383. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Mazar, N., Zhong, C.-B. (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21, 494–498. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Ritter, S. M., Damian, R. I., Simonton, D. K., van Baaren, R., Strick, M., Derks, J., Dijksterhuis, A. (2012). Diversifying experiences enhance cognitive flexibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 961–964. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Roberts, B. W., Jackson, J. J., Fayard, J. V., Edmonds, G., Meints, J. (2009). Conscientiousness. In Leary, M. R., Hoyle, R. H. (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 369–381). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Schweizer, P. (2008). Makers and takers: Why conservatives work harder, feel happier, have closer families, take fewer drugs, give more generously, value honesty more, are less materialistic and envious, whine less and even hug their children more than liberals. New York, NY: Random House. Google Scholar | |
|
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Creativity as blind variation and selective retention: Is the creative process Darwinian? Psychological Inquiry, 10, 309–328. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Wilson, J. Q., Kelling, G. (1982, March). Broken windows. The Atlantic Monthly, pp. 29–38. Google Scholar | |
|
Zhong, C.-B., Strejcek, B., Sivanathan, N. (2010). A clean self can render harsh moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 859–862. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
