![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Taking notes on laptops rather than in longhand is increasingly common. Many researchers have suggested that laptop note taking is less effective than longhand note taking for learning. Prior studies have primarily focused on students’ capacity for multitasking and distraction when using laptops. The present research suggests that even when laptops are used solely to take notes, they may still be impairing learning because their use results in shallower processing. In three studies, we found that students who took notes on laptops performed worse on conceptual questions than students who took notes longhand. We show that whereas taking more notes can be beneficial, laptop note takers’ tendency to transcribe lectures verbatim rather than processing information and reframing it in their own words is detrimental to learning.
References
|
Aiken, E. G., Thomas, G. S., Shennum, W. A. (1975). Memory for a lecture: Effects of notes, lecture rate, and informational density. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 439–444. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Barak, M., Lipson, A., Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38, 245–263. Google Scholar | |
|
Barnett, S. M., Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 612–637. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI | |
|
Bohay, M., Blakely, D. P., Tamplin, A. K., Radvansky, G. A. (2011). Note taking, review, memory, and comprehension. The American Journal of Psychology, 124, 63–73. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI | |
|
Bretzing, B. H., Kulhavy, R. W. (1979). Notetaking and depth of processing. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 4, 145–153. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Bretzing, B. H., Kulhavy, R. W. (1981). Note-taking and passage style. Journal of Educational Psychology, 73, 242–250. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Brown, C. M. (1988). Comparison of typing and handwriting in “two-finger typists.” Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 32, 381–385. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Bui, D. C., Myerson, J., Hale, S. (2013). Note-taking with computers: Exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 299–309. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Butler, A. C. (2010). Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 1118–1133. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI | |
|
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116–131. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Craik, F. I., Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684. Google Scholar | |
|
Diemand-Yauman, C., Oppenheimer, D. M., Vaughan, E. B. (2011). Fortune favors the bold (and the italicized): Effects of disfluency on educational outcomes. Cognition, 118, 111–115. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI | |
|
DiVesta, F. J., Gray, G. S. (1972). Listening and note taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 8–14. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI | |
|
DiVesta, F. J., Gray, S. G. (1973). Listening and note taking: II. Immediate and delayed recall as functions of variations in thematic continuity, note taking, and length of listening-review intervals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 64, 278–287. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Einstein, G. O., Morris, J., Smith, S. (1985). Note-taking, individual differences, and memory for lecture information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 522–532. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50, 906–914. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., White, C. S. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 41–57. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Grace-Martin, M., Gay, G. (2001). Web browsing, mobile computing and academic performance. Educational Technology & Society, 4, 95–107. Google Scholar | |
|
Hembrooke, H., Gay, G. (2003). The laptop and the lecture: The effects of multitasking in learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15, 46–64. Google Scholar | |
|
Igo, L. B., Bruning, R., McCrudden, M. T. (2005). Exploring differences in students’ copy-and-paste decision making and processing: A mixed-methods study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 103–116. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Iqbal, S. T., Horvitz, E. (2007). Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: Field study, analysis, and directions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 677–686). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. doi:10.1145/1240624.1240730 Google Scholar | |
|
Judd, C. M., Westfall, J., Kenny, D. A. (2017). Experiments with more than one random factor: Designs, analytic models, and statistical power. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 601–625. Google Scholar | Medline | |
|
Kay, R., Lauricella, S. (2011). Exploring the benefits and challenges of using laptop computers in higher education classrooms: A formative analysis. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 37(1). Retrieved from http://www.cjlt.ca/index.php/cjlt/article/view/565/299 Google Scholar | |
|
Kiewra, K. A. (1985). Investigating notetaking and review: A depth of processing alternative. Educational Psychologist, 20, 23–32. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Kiewra, K. A. (1989). A review of note-taking: The encoding-storage paradigm and beyond. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 147–172. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Kobayashi, K. (2005). What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 242–262. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Kraushaar, J. M., Novak, D. C. (2010). Examining the affects of student multitasking with laptops during the lecture. Journal of Information Systems Education, 21, 241–251. Google Scholar | |
|
Lin, L., Bigenho, C. (2011). Note-taking and memory in different media environments. Computers in the Schools, 28, 200–216. Google Scholar | |
|
Mitra, A., Steffensmeier, T. (2000). Changes in student attitudes and student computer use in a computer-enriched environment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32, 417–432. Google Scholar | |
|
Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Preacher, K. J., Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717–731. Google Scholar | Medline | |
|
Quade, A. Q. (1996). An assessment of retention and depth of processing associated with notetaking using traditional pencil and paper and an on-line notepad during computer-delivered instruction. In Simonson, M. R., Hays, M., Hall, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1996 Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 559–570). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED397772.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Richland, L. E., Bjork, R. A., Finley, J. R., Linn, M. C. (2005). Linking cognitive science to education: Generation and interleaving effects. In Bara, B. G., Barsalou, L., Bucciarelli, M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1850–1855). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Rubinstein, J. S., Meyer, D. E., Evans, J. E. (2001). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 763–797. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI | |
|
Skolnick, R., Puzo, M. (2008). Utilization of laptop computers in the school of business classroom. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 12, 1–10. Google Scholar | |
|
Slotte, V., Lonka, K. (1999). Review and process effects of spontaneous note-taking on text comprehensions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 1–20. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI | |
|
Sovern, J. (2013). Law student laptop use during class for non-class purposes: Temptation v. incentives. University of Louisville Law Review, 51, 483–517. Google Scholar | |
|
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505. Google Scholar | Medline | ISI | |
|
Van Meter, P., Yokoi, L., Pressley, M. (1994). College students’ theory of note-taking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 325–338. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Wurst, C., Smarkola, C., Gaffney, M. A. (2008). Ubiquitous laptop usage in higher education: Effects on student achievement, student satisfaction, and constructivist measures in honors and traditional classrooms. Computers & Education, 51, 1766–1783. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Yamamoto, K. (2007). Banning laptops in the classroom: Is it worth the hassle? Journal of Legal Education, 57, 477–520. Google Scholar | ISI |
