![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
The role of face typicality in face recognition is well established, but it is unclear whether face typicality is important for face evaluation. Prior studies have focused mainly on typicality’s influence on attractiveness, although recent studies have cast doubt on its importance for attractiveness judgments. Here, we argue that face typicality is an important factor for social perception because it affects trustworthiness judgments, which approximate the basic evaluation of faces. This effect has been overlooked because trustworthiness and attractiveness judgments have a high level of shared variance for most face samples. We show that for a continuum of faces that vary on a typicality-attractiveness dimension, trustworthiness judgments peak around the typical face. In contrast, perceived attractiveness increases monotonically past the typical face, as faces become more like the most attractive face. These findings suggest that face typicality is an important determinant of face evaluation.
References
|
Bartlett, J. C., Hurry, S., Thorley, W. (1984). Typicality and familiarity of faces. Memory & Cognition, 12, 219–228. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Unger, L., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R. (2007). Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: Attractive faces are not always average. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1420–1430. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Galton, F. (1883). Inquiries into human faculty and its development. Cambridge, England: Macmillan. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Halberstadt, J., Rhodes, G. (2003). It’s not just average faces that are attractive: Computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 149–156. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1, 115–121. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., Musselman, L. (1994). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science, 5, 214–220. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Lee, A. Y. (2001). The mere exposure effect: An uncertainty reduction explanation revisited. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 1255–1266. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Levenberg, K. (1944). A method for the solution of certain problems in least squares. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics, 2, 164–168. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Martindale, C., Moore, K. (1988). Priming, prototypicality, and preference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 661–670. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Maxwell, S. E., Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective (Vol. 1). New York, NY: Psychology Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Oosterhof, N. N., Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 11087–11092. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Perrett, D., May, K., Yoshikawa, S. (1994). Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature, 368, 239–242. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Repp, B. H. (1997). The aesthetic quality of a quantitatively average music performance: Two preliminary experiments. Music Perception, 14, 419–444. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rhodes, G. (2006). The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 199–226. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Rhodes, G., Brennan, S., Carey, S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: Implications for mental representations of faces. Cognitive Psychology, 19, 473–497. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Rhodes, G., Hickford, C., Jeffery, L. (2000). Sex-typicality and attractiveness: Are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? British Journal of Psychology, 91, 125–140. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Rhodes, G., Tremewan, T. (1996). Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. Psychological Science, 7, 105–110. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Said, C. P., Dotsch, R., Todorov, A. (2010). The amygdala and FFA track both social and non-social face dimensions. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3596–3605. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Said, C. P., Todorov, A. (2011). A statistical model of facial attractiveness. Psychological Science, 22, 1183–1190. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Tanaka, J. W., Kantner, J., Bartlett, M. (2012). How category structure influences the perception of object similarity: The atypicality bias. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 147. Retrieved from http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00147/full Google Scholar | |
|
Tanaka, J. W., Meixner, T. L., Kantner, J. (2011). Exploring the perceptual spaces of faces, cars and birds in children and adults. Developmental Science, 14, 762–768. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Tiddeman, B., Burt, M., Perrett, D. (2001). Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(5), 42–50. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Todorov, A. (2008). Evaluating faces on trustworthiness: An extension of systems for recognition of emotions signaling approach/avoidance behaviors. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 208–224. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Todorov, A., Dotsch, R., Porter, J. M., Oosterhof, N. N., Falvello, V. B. (2013). Validation of data-driven computational models of social perception of faces. Emotion, 13, 724–738. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Todorov, A., Olivola, C., Dotsch, R., Mende-Siedlecki, P. (in press). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 43, 161–204. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Winston, J. S., O’Doherty, J., Kilner, J. M., Perrett, D. I., Dolan, R. J. (2007). Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 45, 195–206. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Zebrowitz, L. A., Bronstad, P. M., Lee, H. K. (2007). The contribution of face familiarity to ingroup favoritism and stereotyping. Social Cognition, 25, 306–338. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Zebrowitz, L. A., Montepare, J. M. (2008). Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 1497–1517. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline |
