![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
With the continued integration of technology into people’s lives, saving digital information has become an everyday facet of human behavior. In the present research, we examined the consequences of saving certain information on the ability to learn and remember other information. Results from three experiments showed that saving one file before studying a new file significantly improved memory for the contents of the new file. Notably, this effect was not observed when the saving process was deemed unreliable or when the contents of the to-be-saved file were not substantial enough to interfere with memory for the new file. These results suggest that saving provides a means to strategically off-load memory onto the environment in order to reduce the extent to which currently unneeded to-be-remembered information interferes with the learning and remembering of other information.
Keywords
References
|
Bjork, E. L., Bjork, R. A. (1996). Continuing influences of to-be-forgotten information. Consciousness and Cognition, 5, 176–196. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Bjork, R. A. (1989). Retrieval inhibition as an adaptive mechanism in human memory. In Roediger, H. L, Craik, F. I. M. (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 309–330). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In Metcalfe, J., Shimamura, A. (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Bjork, R. A., Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In Healy, A., Kosslyn, S., Shiffrin, R. (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35–67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Clark, A., Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7–19. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Doyle, A. C. (1892). The five orange pips. In The adventures of Sherlock Holmes. London, England: George Newnes. Google Scholar | |
|
Dror, I. E., Harnad, S. (2008). Offloading cognition onto cognitive technology. In Dror, I. E., Harnad, S. (Eds.), Cognition distributed: How cognitive technology extends our minds (pp. 1–23). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Foster, N. L., Sahakyan, L. (2011). The role of forget-cue salience in list-method directed forgetting. Memory, 19, 110–117. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Henkel, L. A. (2014). Point-and-shoot memories: The influence of taking photos on memory for a museum tour. Psychological Science, 25, 396–402. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Isaacson, W. (2007). Einstein: His life and universe. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar | |
|
Kirsh, D., Maglio, P. (1994). On distinguishing epistemic from pragmatic actions. Cognitive Science, 18, 513–549. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Maeda, N. (2012). External working memory and the amount of distributed cognition. In Miyake, N., Peebles, D., Cooper, R. P. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1954–1959). Retrieved from http://mindmodeling.org/cogsci2012/papers/0342/paper0342.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Pastötter, B., Bäuml, K.-H. (2010). Amount of postcue encoding predicts amount of directed forgetting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36, 54–65. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Radvansky, G. A. (2012). Across the event horizon. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 269–272. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Sahakyan, L., Delaney, P. F., Foster, N. L., Abushanab, B. (2013). List-method directed forgetting in cognitive and clinical research: A theoretical and methodological review. In Ross, B. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 59, pp. 131–190). Waltham, MA: Academic Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Sahakyan, L., Kelley, C. M. (2002). A contextual change account of the directed forgetting effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 1064–1072. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Schacter, D. L. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar | |
|
Smith, S. M. (2003). The constraining effects of initial ideas. In Paulus, P. B., Nijstad, B. A. (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 15–31). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B. (2012). Cognition and the creation of ideas. In Holyoak, K. J., Morrison, R. G. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 456–474). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Sparrow, B., Liu, J., Wegner, D. M. (2011). Google effects on memory: Cognitive consequences of having information at our fingertips. Science, 333, 776–778. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Storm, B. C., Bjork, E. L., Bjork, R. A. (2008). Accelerated relearning after retrieval-induced forgetting: The benefit of being forgotten. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 230–236. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Storm, B. C., Patel, T. N. (2014). Forgetting as a consequence and enabler of creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1594–1609. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Tversky, B. (2011). Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 499–535. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Wilson, R. A. (2004). Boundaries of the mind: The individual in the fragile sciences—cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref |
