Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online March 11, 2013

What is Librarian 2.0 – New competencies or interactive relations? A library professional viewpoint

Abstract

Library 2.0 is a change in the way libraries interact with their users. Technological developments on the Web have had a major influence on these changes. The change also places new requirements on librarians’ competencies and skills. This research investigates how librarians themselves see this change in terms of their work identity and working knowledge. The research shows what kinds of qualities and characteristics are expected from a ‘Librarian 2.0’, according to a group of professional librarians. The results associate ‘Librarian 2.0’ firmly with the Web, although some of the more traditional characteristics of librarianship have retained their relevance. This research also shows that the change towards a ‘Librarian 2.0’ can be seen as intimidating by some librarians, a fact that has to be taken into account when libraries develop their future strategies.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Abbott A (1988) The system of Professions. An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Abbott A (1998) Professionalism and the future of librarianship. Library Trends 46(3): 430–443.
Abram S (2008) Social libraries. The Librarian 2.0 phenomenon. Library Resources and Technical Services 52(2): 19–22.
Aharony N (2009) Web 2.0 use by librarians. Library & Information Science Research 31(1): 29–37.
Ashcroft L (2004) Developing competencies, critical analysis and personal transferable skills in future information professionals. Library Review 53(2): 82–88.
Baruchson-Arbib S, Bronstein J (2002) A view to the future of the library and information science profession: A Delphi study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(5): 397–408.
Bennett S, Maton K, Kervin L (2008) The digital natives debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology 39(5): 775–786.
Boyack KW, Klavans R, Börner K (2005), Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics 64(3): 351–374.
Broady-Preston J (2009) Professional education, development and training in a Web 2.0 environment: A case study of the UK. New Library World 110(5/6): 265–279.
Brophy P (2007) The Library in the Twenty-First Century. 2nd edn. London: Facet.
Cassner M, Adams KE (2006) Assessing the professional development needs of distance librarians and academic libraries. Journal of Library Administration 45(1): 81–99.
Chan DC, Auster E (2003) Factors contributing to the professional development of reference librarians. Library & Information Science Research 25(3): 265–286.
Chawner B (2008) Spectators, not players: Information managers’ use of Web 2.0 in New Zealand. Electronic Library 26(5): 630–649.
Courtial JP (1994) A co-word analysis of scientometrics. Scientometrics 31(3): 251–260.
Cullen J (2008a) Professionalizing knowledge sharing and communications. Business Information Review 25(1): 53–57.
Cullen J (2008b) Catalyzing innovation and knowledge sharing: Librarian 2.0. Business Information Review 25(4): 253–258.
Drejer A (2002) Strategic Management and Core Competencies : Theory and Application. Westport, CN: Quorum Books.
Foss NJ, Knudsen C (1996) Towards a Competence Theory of the Firm. London and New York: Routledge.
Fourie I (2004) Librarians and the claiming of new roles: How can we try to make a difference? Aslib Proceedings 56(1): 62–74.
Hager P, Beckett D (1995) Philosophical underpinnings of the integrated conception of competence. Educational Philosophy and Theory 27(1): 1–24.
He Q (1999) Knowledge discovery through co-word analysis. Library Trends 48(1): 133–159.
Hjørland B (2000) Library and information science: Practice, theory, and philosophical basis. Information Processing and Management 36(3): 501–531.
Holmberg K, Huvila I, Kronqvist-Berg M, et al. (2009) What is Library 2.0? Journal of Documentation 65(4): 668–681.
Joint N (2006) Digital libraries and the future of the library profession. Library Review 56(1): 12–23.
Kealy K (2009) Do library staff have what it takes to be a librarian of the future? Library Management 30(8/9): 572–582.
Kosmala K, Herrbach O (2006) The ambivalence of professional identity: On cynicism and jouissance in audit firms. Human Relations 59(10): 1393–1428.
Martell C (2003) The role of librarians in the twenty-first century. In: Drake MA (ed.) Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 2524–2536.
Meschi P-X, Cremer E (2005) Competence building, corporate renewal and value creation - A case study. In: Sanchez R, Heene A (eds) Advances in Applied Business Strategy, Vol.9. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 305–325.
Olander B (2009) Framgångspotential: Egenskapsfaktorer vid rekryteringen av bibliotekarier. Lund: BIVIL.
Olander B, Berry P (1992) Framtidens bibliotek på låntagarnas villkor. In: Blomberg B, Widbäck G (eds) Biblioteket som serviceföretag: Kunden i centrum. Stockholm: Forskningsrådsnämnden, pp. 103–119.
Olsson L (1995) Det datoriserade biblioteket: Maskindrömmar på 70-talet. Linköping: Linköpings Universitet.
Partridge H, Lee J, Munro C (2010a) Becoming ‘Librarian 2.0’: The skills, knowledge, and attributes required by library and information science professionals in a Web 2.0 world (and beyond). Library Trends 59(1/2): 315–335.
Partridge H, Menzies V, Lee J, et al. (2010b) The contemporary librarian: Skills, knowledge and attributes required in a world of emerging technologies. Library and Information Science Research 32(4): 265–271.
Pedersen KN (2006) Librarianship: From collections control to tools understanding. New Library World 107(11/12): 538–551.
Peltier-Davis C (2009) Web 2.0, Library 2.0, Library user 2.0, Librarian 2.0: innovative services for sustainable libraries. Computers in Libraries 29(10: 16–21.
Radford GP (1992) Positivism, Foucault, and the fantasia of the library: Conceptions of knowledge and the modern library experience. Library Quarterly 62(4): 408–424.
Radford GP, Radford ML (2001) Libraries, librarians, and the discourse of fear. Library Quarterly 71(3): 299–329.
Rutherford LL (2008) Implementing social software in public libraries. An exploration of the issues confronting public library adopters of social software. Library Hi Tech 26(2): 184–200.
Sandberg J, Pinnington AH (2009) Professional competence as ways of being: An existential ontological perspective. Journal of Management Studies 46(7): 1138–1170.
Santema S, van de and Rijt J (2005) The valuation of resources: Looking through the eyes of the customer. In: Sanchez R, Heene A (eds) Advances in Applied Business Strategy, Vol. 9. Bingley: Emerald, pp. 17–28.
Sevón K (2007) Bibliotekarierollen i en ny utbildningsorganization. En studie av fyra yrkeshögskolor. Åbo: Åbo Akademis Förlag.
Stephens M (2007) Modeling the Role of Blogging in Librarianship. Texas: University of North Texas. Available at: http://tametheweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/stephens-mfinal.pdf (accessed 2 August 2010).
Stover M (2004) The reference librarian as non-expert: A postmodern approach to expertise. Reference Librarian 42(87): 273–300.
Sundin O, Hedman J (2005) Professions and occupational identities. In: Fisher KE (ed.) Theories of Information Behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today, pp. 293–297.
Torstensson M (2002) Libraries and society: The macrostructural aspect of library and information studies. Library Review 51(3/4): 211–220.
Tuominen K (1997) User centered discourse: An analysis of the subject positions of the user and the librarian. Library Quarterly 67(4): 350–371.
Wenger E (1999) Communities of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biographies

Isto Huvila is a senior lecturer in Information and Knowledge Management at the School of Business and Economics, Åbo Akademi University in Turku, Finland and an associate professor at Uppsala University in Sweden. His primary areas of research include information work and information management, knowledge organization, documentation, and social and participatory information practices. The contexts of his research range from archaeology and cultural heritage, archives, libraries and museums to social media, virtual worlds and corporate and public organizations. Huvila has given numerous invited talks and published broadly on topics ranging from information work management, archaeological information management, social media, virtual reality information issues to archival studies and museum informatics, ancient history and archaeology. He received an MA degree in Cultural History at the University of Turku in 2002 and a PhD in Information Studies at Åbo Akademi University in 2006.
Kim Holmberg, PhD, is a Research Associate at the Statistical Cybermetrics Research Group at University of Wolverhampton, UK, and a Research Fellow at the Department of Information Studies at Åbo Akademi University, Finland. His research interests include webometrics, scientometrics, information dissemination, social media, Web 2.0, Library 2.0 and virtual worlds in education. He has published widely on these topics and held several talks and presentations and organized courses and workshops for companies, universities, libraries and other organizations.
Maria Kronqvist-Berg is a doctoral student at the Department of Information Studies, Åbo Akademi University and a member of the research project Library 2.0 – a new participatory context funded by the Academy of Finland. Kronqvist-Berg received her MSc from the Department of Information Studies, Åbo Akademi University in 2007. Her current research interests are information activities, users, library professionals, social media and public libraries.
Outi Nivakoski is a doctoral student in Information Studies at Åbo Akademi University. She holds a Masters degree in Information Studies from the University of Oulu.
Gunilla Widén is Professor of Information Studies at Åbo Akademi University where she has been a teacher and researcher since 1996. She received her PhD in Information Science in 2001. During 2004–2005 she was a visiting researcher at School of Computing, Edinburgh Napier University. She is also Docent in Information Management at the University of Tampere. Her research fields concern information behaviour, information and knowledge management in business organizations, and aspects of social capital and knowledge sharing in groups and organizations. She has published widely in her areas of expertise and been appointed external expert in several different evaluation committees. She has been project leader of two larger research project financed by the Academy of Finland investigating social aspects of information behaviour on both individual and organizational levels as well as various aspects of social media and a changing information behaviour.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: March 11, 2013
Issue published: September 2013

Keywords

  1. Competence
  2. co-word analysis
  3. librarian
  4. Librarian 2.0
  5. profession

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2013.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Isto Huvila
Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Kim Holmberg
Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Maria Kronqvist-Berg
Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Outi Nivakoski
Åbo Akademi University, Finland
Gunilla Widén
Åbo Akademi University, Finland

Notes

Isto Huvila, Åbo Akademi University, Fänriksgatan 3, Åbo 20500, Finland. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Librarianship and Information Science.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 2923

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 28 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 27

  1. Bilgi Depolarından Topluluk Merkezlerine: Kütüphanelerin Dönüşümü ve Toplum Odaklı Yenilikler
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Professional identity of public librarians, archivists and museum professionals in five European countries
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. The resilient public library: Understand and reflect on own practice
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. LAM professionals' roles and attitudes to user participation in Norway and Sweden
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. Future Skills für Future Librarians – Impulse für Kompetenzanforderungen und Gestaltungsaufgaben von Bibliotheken der Zukunft
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Researching Finnish library responses to Covid-19 digital literacy challenges through the employment of reflective practice
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. Contributions to Low Morale, Part 1: Review of Existing Literature on Librarian and Library Staff Morale
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. Evolutional Librarianship: From Supermarket to Smorgasbord
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. How Undergraduate Students experience Distance Learning as Part of Their Information Literacy
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. What do the business employers want? A sequential mixed methods exploration of information professionals’ competencies
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text