![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Fictional television shows and films convey cultural assumptions about scientists and the research enterprise. But how do these forms of entertainment portray medical research participants? We sampled 65 television shows and films released between 2004 and 2014 to determine the ways in which medical research and human participants are represented in popular media. We found that research participants are largely represented as White, male, and lower or working class and that 40% of the participants depicted in these fictional accounts were seeking financial compensation, 34% were hoping for a therapeutic benefit, and 15% were coerced into participation. Regardless of participant motivation, media representations tended to portray a negative outcome of medical research. Interpreting the themes in these media, we argue that these fictional portrayals might provide the public with valuable representations of medical research, especially in terms of risks to research participants, scientific failure, and researchers’ conflicts of interest.
References
|
Abadie, R (2010) The Professional Guinea Pig: Big Pharma and the Risky World of Human Subjects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Agresti, A, Finlay, B (2009) Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar | |
|
Altheide, DL (1996) Qualitative Media Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Angell, M (2004) The Truth about the Drug Companies: How They Deceive Us and What to Do about It. New York, NY: Random House. Google Scholar | |
|
Biddle, J (2007) Lessons from the Vioxx debacle: What the privatization of science can teach us about social epistemology. Social Epistemology 21(1): 21–39. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bourdaa, M, Konsman, JP, Secail, C, Venturini, T, Veyrat-Masson, I, Gonon, F (2015) Does television reflect the evolution of scientific knowledge? The case of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder coverage on French television. Public Understanding of Science 24(2): 200–209. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Chimba, M, Kitzinger, J (2010) Bimbo or boffin? Women in science: An analysis of media representations and how female scientists negotiate cultural contradictions. Public Understanding of Science 19(5): 609–624. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Christidou, V, Kouvatas, A (2013) Visual self-images of scientists and science in Greece. Public Understanding of Science 22(1): 91–109. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Cole, SA (2015) A surfeit of science: The “CSI effect” and the media appropriation of the public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science 24(2): 130–146. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Cole, SA, Dioso, R (2011) Should judges worry about the “CSI effect”? Court Review 47: 20–31. Google Scholar | |
|
Cole, SA, Dioso-Villa, R (2007) CSI and its effects: Media, juries, and the burden of proof. New England Law Review 41: 435–470. Google Scholar | |
|
DiMasi, JA, Feldman, L, Seckler, A, Wilson, A (2010) Trends in risks associated with new drug development: Success rates for investigational drugs. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 87(3): 272–277. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Dingwall, R, Aldridge, M (2006) Television wildlife programming as a source of popular scientific information: A case study of evolution. Public Understanding of Science 15(2): 131–152. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Dudo, A, Brossard, D, Shanahan, J, Scheufele, DA, Morgan, M, Signorielli, N (2010) Science on television in the 21st century: Recent trends in portrayals and their contributions to public attitudes toward science. Communication Research 38(6): 754–777. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Epstein, S (2007) Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Farré, M, Bosch, F, Roset, PN, Baños, J-E (2004) Putting clinical pharmacology in context: The use of popular movies. Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 44(1): 30–36. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Fisher, JA (2007) “Ready-to-recruit” or “ready-to-consent” populations? Informed consent and the limits of subject autonomy. Qualitative Inquiry 13(6): 875–894. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Fisher, JA (2009) Medical Research for Hire: The Political Economy of Pharmaceutical Clinical Trials. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Fisher, JA (2015) Feeding and bleeding: The institutional banalization of risk to healthy volunteers in Phase I pharmaceutical clinical trials. Science, Technology & Human Values 40(2): 199–226. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Fisher, JA, Cottingham, MD, Kalbaugh, CA (2015) Peering into the pharmaceutical “pipeline”: Investigational drugs, clinical trials, and industry priorities. Social Science & Medicine 131: 322–330. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Getz, KA (2013) Public perceptions are turning the corner. Applied Clinical Trials 22(5): 22–23. Google Scholar | |
|
Hennink-Kaminski, HJ, Willoughby, JF, McMahan, D (2014) Join the conquest: Developing a campaign to increase participation in clinical research in North Carolina. Science Communication 36(1): 30–55. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Hess, DJ (1995) Science & Technology in a Multicultural World: The Cultural Politics of Facts & Artifacts. New York, NY: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Jensen, E (2008) The Dao of human cloning: Utopian/dystopian hype in the British press and popular films. Public Understanding of Science 17(2): 123–143. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Jones, R (2001) “Why can’t you scientists leave things alone?” Science questioned in British films of the post-war period (1945–1970). Public Understanding of Science 10: 365–382. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Kirby, DA (2003) Science consultants, fictional films, and scientific practice. Social Studies of Science 33(2): 231–268. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Ley, BL, Jankowski, N, Brewer, PR (2010) Investigating CSI: Portrayals of DNA testing on a forensic crime show and their potential effects. Public Understanding of Science 21(1): 51–67. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Light, DW, Lexchin, J, Darrow, JJ (2013) Institutional corruption of pharmaceuticals and the myth of safe and effective drugs. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 41(3): 590–600. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Long, M, Boiarsky, G, Thayer, G (2001) Gender and racial counter-stereotypes in science education television: A content analysis. Public Understanding of Science 10: 255–269. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Lowe, T, Brown, K, Dessai, S, de França Doria, M, Haynes, K, Vincent, K (2006) Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science 15(4): 435–457. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
O’Neill, RD (2006) “Frankenstein to futurism”: Representations of organ donation and transplantation in popular culture. Transplantation Reviews 20(4): 222–230. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Orthia, LA (2010) Antirationalist critique or fifth column of scientism? Challenges from Doctor Who to the mad scientist trope. Public Understanding of Science 20(4): 525–542. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Peddicord, D (2012) Television’s assault on medical research. Available at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/doug-peddicord/televisions-assault-on-me_b_1909333.html Google Scholar | |
|
Redfearn, S (2012) Toshiba ultrabook TV ad puts clinical trials in spotlight, spurring ACRO into action over patient portrayal. Center Watch Weekly 16(47): 1–4. Google Scholar | |
|
Reid, G (2012) The television drama-documentary (dramadoc) as a form of science communication. Public Understanding of Science 21(8): 984–1001. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Rose, C (2003) How to teach biology using the movie science of cloning people, resurrecting the dead, and combining flies and humans. Public Understanding of Science 12: 289–296. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Schäfer, MS (2012) Taking stock: A meta-analysis of studies on the media’s coverage of science. Public Understanding of Science 21(6): 650–663. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Steinke, J (1997) A portrait of a woman as a scientist: Breaking down barriers created by gender-role stereotypes. Public Understanding of Science 6: 409–428. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Steinke, J (2005) Cultural representations of gender and science: Portrayals of female scientists and engineers in popular films. Science Communication 27(1): 27–63. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Stilgoe, J, Lock, SJ, Wilsdon, J (2014) Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science 23(1): 4–15. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Tukachinsky, R, Mastro, D, Yarchi, M (2015) Documenting portrayals of race/ethnicity on primetime television over a 20-year span and their association with national-level racial/ethnic attitudes. Journal of Social Issues 71(1): 17–38. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Van Gorp, B, Rommes, E, Emons, P (2014) From the wizard to the doubter: Prototypes of scientists and engineers in fiction and non-fiction media aimed at Dutch children and teenagers. Public Understanding of Science 23(6): 646–659. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Wendler, D, Kington, R, Madans, J, Wye, GV, Christ-Schmidt, H, Pratt, LA. (2006) Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research? PLoS Medicine 3(2): e19. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Yang, Y, Carlin, AS, Faustino, PJ, Pagan Motta, MI, Hamad, ML, He, R. (2009) Participation of women in clinical trials for new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2000–2002. Journal of Women’s Health 18(3): 303–310. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
