Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online February 21, 2014

Drone strikes, dingpolitik and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and security

Abstract

Recent scholarship in critical security studies argues that matter matters because it is not an inert backdrop to social life but lively, affectively laden, active in the constitution of subjects, and capable of enabling and constraining security practices and processes. This article seeks to further the debate about materiality and security. Its main claim is that materials-oriented approaches to security typically focus on the place of materials and objects within technologies and assemblages of governance. Less often do they ask how materials and objects become entangled in political controversies, and how objects mediate issues of public concern. To bring publics and contentious politics more fully into the debate about the matter of security, the article engages with Latour’s work on politics, publics and things – or dingpolitik. It then connects the theme of dingpolitik to a particular controversy: Human Rights Watch’s investigation of Gaza civilians allegedly killed by Israeli drone-launched missiles in 2008–2009. Drawing three lessons from this case, the article explores how further conversation between dingpolitik and security studies can be mutually beneficial for both literatures.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Abu-Laban J, Bakan A (2012) After 9/11: Canada, the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the surveillance of public discourse. Canadian Journal of Law and Society 27(3): 319–340.
Adey P, Anderson B (2012) Anticipating emergencies: Technologies of preparedness and the matter of security. Security Dialogue 43(2): 99–117.
Amnesty International (2009) Fuelling Conflict: Foreign Arms Supplies to Israel/Gaza. London: Amnesty International.
Amnesty International (2013) ‘Will I Be Next?’ US Drone Strikes in Pakistan. London: Amnesty International.
Amoore L, Hall A (2010) Border theatre: On the arts of security and resistance. Cultural Geographies 17(3): 299–319.
Anaïs S (2011) Ethical interventions: Non-lethal weapons and the governance of insecurity. Security Dialogue 42(6): 537–552.
Aradau C (2010) Security that matters: Critical infrastructure and objects of protection. Security Dialogue 41(5): 491–514.
Barry A (2002) The anti-political economy. Economy and Society 11(2): 268–294.
Barry A (2010) Materialist politics: Metallurgy. In: Braun B, Whatmore S (eds) Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 89–118.
BBC News Online (2003) Fact file: Smart bombs – Not so smart. 27 February. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2805775.stm (accessed 11 December 2013).
Beier JM (2003) Discriminating tastes: ‘Smart’ bombs, non-combatants, and notions of legitimacy in warfare. Security Dialogue 34(4): 411–425.
Bellanova R, Duez D (2012) A different view on the ‘making’ of European security: The EU passenger name record system as a socio-technical assemblage. European Foreign Affairs Review 17(2): 109–124.
Bennett J (2010) Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Best J, Walters W (2013) Translating the sociology of translation. International Political Sociology 7(3): 345–349.
Bourne M (2012) Guns don’t kill people, cyborgs do: A Latourian provocation for transformatory arms control and disarmament. Global Change, Peace & Security 24(1): 141–163.
Browning C, McDonald M (2011) The future of critical security studies: Ethics and the politics of security. European Journal of International Relations 19(2): 235–255.
Bueger C (2013) Actor-network theory, methodology, and international organization. International Political Sociology 3(7): 338–342.
Burton Harrington E (2007) Nation, identity and the fascination with forensic science in Sherlock Holmes and CSI. International Journal of Cultural Studies 10(3): 365–382.
Butler J (2004) Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.
Callon M, Lascoumes P, Barthe Y (2009) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ceyhan A (2008) Techologization of security: Management of uncertainty and risk in the age of biometrics. Surveillance and Society 5(2): 102–123.
Coward M (2006) Against anthropocentrism: The destruction of the built environment as a distinct form of political violence. Review of International Studies 32(3): 419–437.
De Goede M (2013) Publicity, preventability, responsibility in the UK 7/7 inquest. Political Geography. Epub ahead of print 11 December 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.08.001.
De Laet M, Mol A (2000) The Zimbabwe bush pump: Mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science 30(2): 225–263.
Edkins J (1999) Poststructuralism and International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Foucault M (1998) Nietzsche, genealogy, history. In: Rabinow P (ed.) Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984, Vol. 2. New York: New Press, pp. 369–392.
Fraser N (2007) Transnationalizing the public sphere: On the legitimacy and efficacy of public opinion in a post-Westphalian world. Theory, Culture & Society 24(4): 7–30.
Galison P (2005) Removing knowledge. In: Latour B, Weibel P (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 590–599.
Gordon A (2008) Ghostly Matters: Haunting and the Sociological Imagination, 2nd edn. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Gregory D (2011) From a view to a kill: Drones and late modern war. Theory, Culture & Society 28(7–8): 188–215.
Guardian (2009) Human Rights Watch investigator accused of collecting Nazi memorabilia. 10 September. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/sep/10/human-rights-watch-israel-nazi.
Harré R (2002) Material objects in social worlds. Theory, Culture & Society 19(5–6): 23–33.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) (2009a) Precisely Wrong: Gaza Civilians Killed by Israeli Drone-launched Missiles. New York: HRW. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/reports/2009/06/30/precisely-wrong-0.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) (2009b) Israel: Misuse of drones killed civilians in Gaza. 30 June. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/news/2009/06/30/israel-misuse-drones-killed-civilians-gaza (accessed 11 December 2013).
Huysmans J (2006) The Politics of Insecurity. London: Routledge.
International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic (Stanford Law School) and Global Justice Clinic (NYU Law School) (IHRCRCGJC) (2012) Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan. Available at: http://www.livingunderdrones.org/report/ (accessed 3 December 2013).
Kafka F ([1909] 2007) The aeroplanes at Brescia. In: Metamorphosis and Other Stories. New York: Penguin, pp. 287–295.
Latour B (1992) Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In: Bijker W, Law J (eds) Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 225–258.
Latour B (2005a) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Latour B (2005b) From realpolitik to dingpolitik; Or, how to make things public. In: Latour B, Weibel P (eds) Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 14–41.
Law J (ed.) (1987) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Law J, Singleton V (2005) Object lessons. Organization 12(3): 331–335.
Leander A (2013) Technological agency in the co-constitution of legal expertise and the US drone program. Leiden Journal of International Law 26(4): 811–831.
Lippmann W (1925) The Phantom Public. New York: Harcourt.
MacKenzie D (1990) Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Marres N, Lezaun J (2011) Materials and devices of the public: An introduction. Economy and Society 40(4): 489–509.
Moss G, O’Loughlin B (2008) Convincing claims? Democracy and representation in post-9/11 Britain. Political Studies 56(3): 705–724.
Neyland D (2009) Mundane terror and the threat of everyday objects. In: Aas KF, Gundhus HO, Lomell HM (eds) Technologies of InSecurity: The Surveillance of Everyday Life. New York: Routledge, pp. 21–41.
NGO Monitor (2009) Absolutely wrong: Analysis of HRW report, ‘Precisely wrong: Gaza civilians killed by Israeli drone-launched missiles,’ 30 June 2009. Available at: http://www.ngo-monitor.org/article/absolutely_wrong_analysis_of_hrw_drone_report (accessed 3 December 2013).
Nyers P (2003) Abject cosmopolitanism: The politics of protection in the anti-deportation movement. Third World Quarterly 24(6): 1069–1093.
Nyers P (2012) Moving borders: The politics of dirt. Radical Philosophy 174: 2–6.
Osborne T, Rose N (1999) Do the social sciences create phenomena? The example of public opinion research. British Journal of Sociology 50(3): 367–396.
Pouliot V (2010) The materials of practice: Nuclear warheads, rhetorical commonplaces and committee meetings in Russian–Atlantic relations. Cooperation and Conflict 45(3): 294–311.
Rancière J (1999) Disagreement: Politics and Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Salter M, Mutlu C (2012) Psychoanalytic theory and border security. European Journal of Social Theory 15(2): 179–195.
Schwartz J (2009) Rights group assailed for analyst’s Nazi collection. New York Times, 14 September. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/15/world/middleeast/15nazi.html?_r=1& (accessed 11 December 2013).
Shah N (2012) The secret devices of security: The invisible materials of public security. Paper presented at the workshop ‘Security and Its Publics’, Carleton University, 21 September 2012.
Shaw I, Akhter M (2012) The unbearable humanness of drone warfare in FATA, Pakistan. Antipode 44(4): 1490–1509.
Simon J (2005) Parrhesiastic accountability: Investigatory commissions and executive power in an age of terror. Yale Law Journal 114(6): 1419–1457.
Urquhart C (2011) The Goldstone report: A history. Guardian (London), 14 April. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/apr/14/goldstone-report-history.
Van Veeren E (2012) Materializing post-9/11 security: Guantanamo’s legacies. Paper presented at the Department of Political Science, Carleton University, 22 November 2012.
Vennesson P, Rajkovic N (2012) The transnational politics of warfare accountability: Human Rights Watch versus the Israel Defense Forces. International Relations 26(4): 409–429.
Virgil (2006) Georgics, Book I, trans. Fallon P. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Voelkner N (2011) Managing pathogenic circulation: Human security and the migrant health assemblage in Thailand. Security Dialogue 42(3): 239–259.
Walters W (2002) The power of inscription: Beyond social construction and deconstruction in European integration studies. Millennium 31(1): 83–108.
Walters W (forthcoming) Parrhesia today: Drone strikes, fearless speech, and the contentious politics of security. Global Society 28(3).
Weber C, Lacy M (2010) Designing security. In: Burgess JP (ed.) Routledge Handbook of New Security Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 240–252.
Weizman E (2010) Forensic architecture: Only the criminal can solve the crime. Radical Philosophy 164 (November/December): 9–24.
Weizman E (2012) The Least of All Possible Evils: Humanitarian Violence from Arendt to Gaza. London: Verso.
Williams D (2009) Human Rights Watch accuses Israel over Gaza drones. Reuters, 30 June. Available at: http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/06/30/us-israel-palestinians-drones-idUSTRE55T37A20090630?feedType=RSS&feedName=worldNews&pageNumber=2&virtualBrandChannel=0&sp=true (accessed 11 December 2013).
Zehfuss M (2010) Targeting: Precision and the production of ethics. European Journal of International Relations 17(3): 543–566.

Biographies

William Walters teaches political sociology at Carleton University (Canada). His most recent book is Governmentality: Critical Encounters (Routledge, 2012).

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material files:

Drone strikes, dingpolitik and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and security

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: February 21, 2014
Issue published: April 2014

Keywords

  1. drone strikes
  2. Latour
  3. materiality
  4. political controversy
  5. public sphere
  6. security

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2014.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

William Walters
Department of Political Science, Carleton University, Canada

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Security Dialogue.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 3825

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 112 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 102

  1. New materialism, whiteness and the politics of vitality: Rethinking activity/passivity in critical security studies
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Nuclearization and de-democratization: security, secrecy, and the French pursuit of nuclear weapons (1945–1974)
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  3. Infrastructures and International Relations: A Critical Reflection on Materials and Mobilities
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  4. From religious police to religious policing
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  5. The Materiality of Lake Kariba
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  6. Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coping Mechanisms and Posttraumatic Stress Exhibited by Children in Areas of Yemen’s Armed Conflict in Southern Saudi Arabia
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  8. The ‘individualization of war’: discussion and critique of a discourse
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  9. Making pushbacks public: Secrecy, material witnesses and devices of dis/appearance
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  10. Slipping the Line
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  11. View More

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text