Does Team Building Work?

First Published January 16, 2009 Research Article

Authors

University of Central Florida
by this author
,
University of Central Florida
by this author
,
University of Central Florida, [email protected]
by this author
,
University of Central Florida
by this author
,
University of Central Florida
by this author
,
University of Central Florida
by this author
,
Army Research Institute
by this author
First Published Online: January 16, 2009

This research reports the results of a comprehensive investigation into the effectiveness of team building. The article serves to update and extend Salas, Rozell, Mullen, and Driskell's (1999) team-building meta-analysis by assessing a larger database and examining a broader set of outcomes. Our study considers the impact of four specific team-building components (goal setting, interpersonal relations, problem solving, and role clarification) on cognitive, affective, process, and performance outcomes. Results (based on 60 correlations) suggest that team building has a positive moderate effect across all team outcomes. In terms of specific outcomes, team building was most strongly related to affective and process outcomes. Results are also presented on the differential effectiveness of team building based upon the team size.

Allaire, P.A. (1998). Lessons in teamwork. In D. C. Hambrick , D. A. Nadler , & M. L. Tushman (Eds.), Navigating change: How CEOs, top teams, and boards steer transformation (pp. 113-130). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Google Scholar
Applebaum, E. , & Batt, R. (1994). The new American workplace: Transforming work systems in the United States. Ithaca, NY: IRL Press.
Google Scholar
Aronson, E. , Ellsworth, P.C. , Carlsmith, J.M. , & Gonzales, M.H. (1990). Methods of research in social psychology. Boston: McGraw-Hill .
Google Scholar
Bantel, K.A. , & Jackson, S.E. (1989). Top management innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107-124.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Beer, M. (1976). The technology of organization development. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 937-994). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Google Scholar
Blake, R.R. , & Mouton, I.S. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston : Gulf.
Google Scholar
*Boss, R.W. , & McConkie, M.L. (1981). The destructive impact of a positive team-building intervention. Group and Organization Studies, 6, 45-56.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
*Bragg, J.E. , & Andrews, J.R. (1973). Participative decision-making: An experimental study in a hospital. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 9, 727-735.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Buller, P.F. (1982). The effects of team building-problem solving and goal setting-performance feedback on the productivity of underground metal miners: A field experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
Google Scholar
Buller, P.F. (1986). The team building-task performance relation: Some conceptual and methodological refinements. Group and Organization Studies, 11, 147-168.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
*Buller, P.F. , & Bell, C.H., Jr. (1986). Effects of team building and goal setting on productivity: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 305-328.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
*Bushe, G.R. , & Coetzer, G. (1995). Appreciative inquiry as a team-development intervention: A controlled experiment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 31, 13-30.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
*Cohen, S.B. (1993). Effects of attribution retraining and positive peer support training on team cohesion, performance, and participant satisfaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY.
Google Scholar
DeMeuse, K.P. , & Liebowitz, S.J. (1981). An empirical analysis of team-building research. Group and Organization Studies, 6, 357-378.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
*Dionne, S.D. (1998). Team training and development in organizations: A multiple levels of analysis field experiment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton.
Google Scholar
Dyer, W.G. (1977). Team building: Issues and alternatives. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar
Dyer, W.G. (1987). Team building: Issues and alternatives (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar
*Eden, D. (1986). Team development: Quasi-experimental confirmation among combat companies. Group and Organization Studies, 11, 133-146.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Field, A.P. (2001). Meta-analysis of correlation coefficients: A Monte Carlo comparison of fixed- and random-effects methods. Psychological Methods, 6, 161-180.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Field, A.P. (2005). Is the meta-analysis of correlation coefficients accurate when population correlations vary? Psychological Methods, 10, 444-467.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
*Friedlander, F. (1967). The impact of organizational training laboratories upon effectiveness of ongoing work groups. Personnel Psychology , 20, 289-307.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
*Gibson, C.B. (2001). Me and us: Differential relationships among goal-setting training, efficacy and effectiveness at the individual and team level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 789-808.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gully, S.M. , Devine, D.J. , & Whitney, D.J. (1995). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 26, 497-520.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Halebian, J. , & Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 844-863.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hambrick, D.C. , & D'Aveni, R.A. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science , 38, 1445-1466.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
*Howard, J. (1979). Organizational team building in church-related teams. Unpublished dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology, San Diego.
Google Scholar
*Huang, W.W. , Wei, K. , Watson, R.T. , & Tan, B.C.Y. (2002). Supporting virtual team-building with a GSS: An empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems , 34, 359-367.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
*Hughes, R.L. , Rosenbach, W.E. , & Clover, W.H. (1983). Team development in an intact, ongoing work group: A quasi-field experiment. Group and Organization Studies, 8, 161-186.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hunter, J.E. , & Schmidt, F.L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Hunter, J.E. , & Schmidt, F.L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hunter, J.E. , Schmidt, F.L. , & Jackson, G.B. (1982). Meta-analysis: Cumulating findings across research . Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Hunter, J.E. , & Schmidt, F.L. , & Le, H. (2006). Implications of direct and indirect range restriction for meta-analysis method and findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 594-612.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Indik, B.P. (1965). Operational size and member participation: Some empirical tests of alternative explanations. Human Relations , 18, 339-350.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Johnson, B.T. , Mullen, B. , & Salas, E. (1995). Comparison of three major meta-analytic approaches . Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 94-106.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
*Kimberley, J.R. , & Nielsen, W.R. (1975). Organization development and change in organizational performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 191-206.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kozlowski, S.W.J. , & Ilgen, D.R. (2006). Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and teams. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7(3), 77-124.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Kraiger, K. , Ford, J.K. , & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Light, R.J. , & Pillemer, D.B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
*Longenecker, C.O. , Scazzero, J.A. , & Stansfield, T.T. (1994). Quality improvement through team goal setting, feedback, and problem solving. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 11(4), 45-53.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Macy, B.A. , & Izumi, H. (1993). Organizational change, design and work innovation: A meta-analysis of 131 North American field experiments, 1961-1991. In W. Pasmore & R. Woodman (Eds.), Research in organizational change and development (pp. 235-313). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
Google Scholar
*Miller, D.J., Jr. (1997). The impact of low ropes course training on team development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Colorado Technical University, Colorado Springs.
Google Scholar
*Mitchell, R. (1986). Team building by disclosure of internal frames of reference. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 22, 15-28.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
*Morrison, P. , & Sturges, J. (1980). Evaluation of organization development in a large state government organization. Group and Organization Studies , 5, 48-64.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Mullen, B. (1987). Self-attention theory. In B. Mullen & G. R. Goethals (Eds.), Theories of group behavior (pp. 125-146). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Google Scholar
Mullen, B. , Anthony, T. , Salas, E. , & Driskell, J.E. (1994). Group cohesiveness and quality of decision making: An integration of tests of the groupthink hypothesis . Small Group Research, 25, 189-204.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Mullen, B. , Brown, R.J. , & Smith, C. (1992). Ingroup bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology , 22, 103-122.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mullen, B. , & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 210-227.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mullen, B. , Salas, E. , & Driskell, J.E. (1989). Salience, motivation, and artifact as contributions to the relation between participation rate and leadership . Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 545-559.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Noe, R.A. (2002). Employee training and development (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill .
Google Scholar
Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York : McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Payne, V. (2001). The team-building workshop: A trainer's guide . New York: AMACOM.
Google Scholar
Porras, J.I. , & Wilkins, A. (1980). Organization development in a large system: An empirical assessment. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science , 16, 506-534.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file drawer problem" and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638-641.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In. H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231-244). New York: Russell Sage.
Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. , & Rubin, D. (1988). Comment: Assumptions and procedures in the file drawer problem. Statistical Science, 3, 120-125.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Salas, E. , & Cannon-Bowers, J.A. (1997). Methods, tools, and strategies for team training. In M. A. Quinones & A. Ehrenstein (Eds.), Training for a rapidly changing workplace: Applications of psychological research (pp. 249-280). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
Google Scholar | Crossref
Salas, E. , Priest, H.A. , & DeRouin, R.E. (2005). Team building. In N. Stanton , H. Hendrick , S. Konz , K. Parsons , & E. Salas (Eds.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics methods (pp. 48-1, 48-5). London: Taylor & Francis.
Google Scholar
Salas, E. , Rozell, D. , Mullen, B. , & Driskell, J.E. (1999). The effect of team building on performance: An integration. Small Group Research, 30, 309-329.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Scargle, J.D. (2000). Publication bias: The "file-drawer" problem in scientific inference. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 48, 91-106.
Google Scholar
Schein, E.H. (1969). Process consultation: Its role in organization development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
Google Scholar
Schein, E.H. (1999). Process consultation revisited: Building the helping relationship. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley .
Google Scholar
Schmidt, F.L. , & Le, H. (2005). Software for the Hunter-Schmidt meta-analysis methods (Vol. 1.1). Iowa City: University of Iowa, Department of Management & Organizations.
Google Scholar
Shadish, W. , Cook, T. , & Campbell, D. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Shrout, P.E. , & Fleiss, J.L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420-428.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Stasser, G. , Vaughan, S.I. , & Stewart, D.D. (2000). Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 102-116.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sundstrom, E. , DeMeuse, K.P. , & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sundstrom, E. , McIntyre, M. , Halfhill, T. , & Richards, H. (2000). Work groups: From the Hawthorne studies to work teams of the 1990s and beyond. Group Dynamics, 4, 44-67.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Svyantek, D.J. , Goodman, S.A. , Benz, L.L. , & Gard, J.A. (1999). The relationship between organizational characteristics and team building success. Journal of Business Psychology , 14, 265-283.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tannenbaum, S.I. , Beard, R.L. , & Salas, E. (1992). Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. In K. Kelley (Ed.), Issue, theory, and research in industrial/organizational psychology (pp. 117-153). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Google Scholar
*Wegenast, D.P. (1983). Team building: An application of leadership skills to case management in child protective services. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , City University of New York, New York City.
Google Scholar
*Wexler, K.J. (1990). Team building: A multidimensional analysis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Hofstra University, Hempstead.
Google Scholar
Whitener, E.M. (1990). Confusion of confidence intervals and credibility intervals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 315-321.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
*Woodman, R.W. , & Sherwood, J.J. (1980). Effects of team development intervention: A field experiment. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 16, 211-227.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Access

    does not have access to this content.

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

SGR-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $289.33

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top