Recent successes by independent presidential candidates raise questions about the stability of the American two-party system. Students of electoral behavior point to party decline, whereas analysts of party organization see growth and transformation. Analyses of the 1968, 1980, 1992, and 1996 National Election Study surveys are used to determine whether support for Wallace, Anderson, and Perot resulted from dissatisfaction with the current two-party system. We find that there has been little erosion of support for the major political parties between 1968 and 1996. Americans with low levels of support for the major political parties were more likely to support Wallace in 1968 and Perot in 1992 and 1996. But to a large extent, support for Wallace, Anderson, and Perot resulted from dissatisfaction with the major-party candidates. Support for the major parties themselves has not eroded enough to provide a systemic opportunity for an independent candidate or for a new political party to end the Republican and Democratic duopoly.

Abramson, Paul R. 1983. Political Attitudes in America: Formation and Change. San Francisco: W H. Freeman.
Google Scholar
Abramson, Paul R. , John H. Aldrich , Phil Paolino , and David W Rohde . 1995. “Third-Party and Independent Candidates in American Politics: Wallace, Anderson, and Perot”. Political Science Quarterly 110 (Fall): 349-367.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Abramson, Paul R. , John H. Aldrich , Phil Paolino , and David W Rohde . 1998. “Challenges to the American Two-Party System: Evidence from the 1968, 1980, 1992, and 1996 Presidential Elections”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
Google Scholar
Abramson, Paul R. , John H. Aldrich , and David W Rohde . 1999. Change and Continuity in the 1996 and 1998 Elections. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Google Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties?: The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Aldrich, John H. 1999. “Political Parties in a Critical Era”. American Politics Quarterly. 27 (January): 9-32
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Aldrich, John H. , and David W Rohde . 1997-98. “The Transition to Republican Rule in the House: Implications for Theories of Congressional Politics”. Political Science Quarterly 112 (Winter): 541-567.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Alvarez, R. Michael , and Jonathan Nagler . 1995. “Economics, Issues and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election”. American Journal of Political Science 39 (August): 714-744.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Party Identification and Voting Behavior, 1952-1996”. AmericanJournal of Political Science 44 (January): 35-50.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Butler, David , and Donald Stokes . 1974. Political Change in Britain: The Evolution of Electoral Choice, 2nd ed. London, UK: Macmillan.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Campbell, Angus , Philip E. Converse , Warren E. Miller , and Donald E. Stokes . 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley
Google Scholar
Ceaser, James , and Andrew Busch . 1993. Upside Down and Inside Out: The 1992 Elections and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Ceaser, James , and Andrew Busch . 1997. Losing to Win: The 1996 Election and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly . 1994. Congressional Quarterly's Guide to U.S. Elections, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly . 1997. Presidential Elections, 1789-1996. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly
Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. 1976. The Dynamics of Party Support: Cohort-Analyzing Party Identification. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Converse, Philip E. , Warren E. Miller , Jerrold G. Rusk , and Arthur C. Wolfe . 1969. “Continuity and Change in American Politics: Parties and Issues in the 1968 Election”. American Political Science Review 63 (December): 1083-1105.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cox, Gary W 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Crewe, Ivor , and Anthony King . 1995. The Birth, Life, and Death of the Social Democratic Party. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. , and Martin P Wattenberg . 1993. “The Not So Simple Act of Voting”. In Ada W Finifter , ed., Political Science: The State of the Discipline II. Washington, DC: American Political Science Association.
Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony . 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice . 1963. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State, trans. Barbara North and Robert North. New York: Wiley
Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice . 1986. “Duverger's Law Forty Years Later”. In Bernard Grofman and Arend Lijphart , eds., Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences. New York: Agathon Press.
Google Scholar
Honaker, James , Anne Joseph , Gary King , Kenneth Sheve , and Naunihal Singh . 1999. “Amelia: A Program for Missing Data (Windows Version).” Cambridge, MA. Harvard University, http://Gking.Harvard.edu.
Google Scholar
Keith, Bruce E. , David B. Magleby , Candice J. Nelson , Elizabeth Orr , Mark C. Westlye , and Raymond E. Wolfinger . 1992. The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Key, V O., Jr. 1965. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 5th ed. New York: Crowell.
Google Scholar
King, Gary , James Honaker , Anne Joseph , and Kenneth Sheve . 1998, “Listwise Deletion is Evil: What to Do about Missing Data in Political Science”. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
Google Scholar
Ladd, Everett Carll . 1993. “The 1992 Vote for President Clinton: Another Brittle Mandate? Political Science Quarterly 108 (Spring): 1-28.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mayer, William G. 1996. The Divided Democrats: Ideological Unity, Party Reform, and Presidential Elections. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin I. , and Calvin C. Jones . 1979. “Reciprocal Effects of Policy Preferences, Party Loyalties and the Vote”. American Political Science Review 73 (December): 1071-1089.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Petrocik, John R. 1974. “An Analysis of Intransitivities in the Index of Party Identification”. Political Methodology 1 (Summer): 31-47.
Google Scholar
Rahn, Wendy M. , John H. Aldrich , Eugene Borgida , and John L. Sullivan . 1990. “A Social-Cognitive Model of Candidate Appraisal”. In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski , eds., Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. “The Two-party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science”. American Political Science Review 76 (December): 753-766.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rohde, David W 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rosenstone, Steven J. , Roy L. Behr , and Edward H. Lazarus . 1984. Third Parties in America: Citizen Response to Major Party Failure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Rosenstone, Steven J. , and John Mark Hansen . 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Schlesinger, Joseph A. 1991. Political Parties and the Winning of Office. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Shafer, Byron E. , and William J. M. Claggett . 1995. The Two Majorities: The Issue Context of American Politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Google Scholar
Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States, rev. ed. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Google Scholar
Wattenberg, Martin P 1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Parties: Presidential Elections of the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wattenberg, Martin P 1998. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952-1996. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Zaller, John , and Mark Hunt . 1994. “The Rise and Fall of Candidate Perot: Unmediated Versus Mediated Politics-Part I”. Political Communication 11 (Oct.-Dec.): 357-390.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Zaller, John , and Mark Hunt . 1995. “The Rise and Fall of Candidate Perot: Unmediated Versus Mediated Politics-Part II”. Political Communication 12 (Jan.-March): 97-123.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

PRQ-article-ppv for $37.50

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top