Abstract
Executive agreements represent a powerful tool for pursuing commitments with other nations across the spectrum of foreign policy issues. In particular, the executive agreement gives presidents the flexibility to act independently of Congress. The authors' research demonstrates, quantitatively, how presidents use international executive agreements to advance their foreign policy priorities. The authors evaluate the foreign policy agendas of the Carter, Reagan, G. H. W. Bush, and first Clinton administrations and test whether the executive agreements signed during each administration serve to further the individual foreign policy goals of each president. The authors find that presidents are more likely to devote personal attention to an agreement that furthers a specific policy priority, and they identify greater agreement activity in areas that correspond to presidential initiatives.
|
Caruson, Kiki. 2002. International agreement-making and the executive-legislative relationship: A review of the exercise of formal diplomacy under the Reagan, Bush and Clinton administrations (1981-1996). PRG Report 25:21-28. Google Scholar | |
|
Delaet, C. James , and James M. Scott. 2006. Treaty-making and partisan politics: Arms control and the U.S. Senate, 1960-2001. Foreign Policy Analysis 2:177-200. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Farrar-Myers, Victoria A. 2002. A new tool in the woodshed: Presidential use of executive agreements in the post-Case world. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Google Scholar | |
|
Howell, William G. 2003. Power without persuasion: The politics of direct presidential action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Johnson, Loch K. 1984. The making of international agreements: Congress confronts the executive. New York: New York University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Johnson, Loch , and James M. McCormick . 1978. The making of international agreements: A reappraisal of congressional involvement. Journal of Politics 40:468-78. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Krutz, Glen S. and Jeffrey S. Peake . 2006. “The changing nature of presidential policy making on international agreements.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 36:391-409. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Margolis, Lawrence. 1986. Executive agreements and presidential power in foreign policy. New York: Praeger Special Studies. Google Scholar | |
|
Martin, Lisa L. 2000. Democratic commitments: Legislatures and international cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Martin, Lisa L. 2005. The president and international commitments: Treaties as signaling devices. Presidential Studies Quarterly 35:440-65. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Mayer, Kenneth. 2001. With the stroke of a pen: Executive orders and presidential power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Neustadt, Richard E. 1990. Presidential power. New York: Free Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Ragsdale, Lyn. 1998. Vital statistics on the presidency: Washington to Clinton . Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law of the United States. American Law Institute, 1986. Google Scholar | |
|
Schlesinger, Arthur M., Jr. 1973. The imperial presidency. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Google Scholar | |
|
Setear, John K. 2002. The president's rational choice of a treaty's pre-ratification pathway: Article II, congressional-executive agreement, or executive agreement? Journal of Legal Studies 31:5-39. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Swift, Elaine K. , Robert G. Brookshire , David T. Canon , Evelyn C. Fink , John R. Hibbing , Brian D. Humes , Michael J. Malbin , and Kenneth C. Martis . 2000. Database of congressional historical statistics [Computer file]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor]. Google Scholar | |
|
U.S. Congress, Senate Committee on Foreign Relations. 2001. Treaties and Other International Agreements: The Role of the United States Senate, A Study. 106th Congress, 2nd session, S. Prt. 106-71, January 2001. Washington: U.S., GPO. Google Scholar |
