Responsiveness in an Era of Inequality: The Case of the U.S. Senate

First Published October 11, 2012 Research Article

Authors

1
 
Trinity University, San Antonio, TX, USA
by this author
First Published Online: October 11, 2012

To what extent do members of Congress respond unequally to people in different economic situations? How does partisan control of the agenda change the way in which Senators respond to the poor? Using data from the 2004 National Annenberg Election Survey, and multiple roll call votes, I examine Senate responsiveness for the 107th through 111th Congresses. The results show consistent responsiveness toward upper income constituents. Moreover, Republicans are more responsive than Democrats to middle-income constituents in the 109th Congress, and a case study of the 107th Senate reveals that responsiveness toward the wealthy increases once Democrats take control of the chamber.

Achen, Christopher H. 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22:475-509.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Achen, Christopher H., Bartels, Larry M. 2004. “Musical Chairs: Pocketbook Voting and the Limits of Democratic Accountability.” Unpublished manuscript. Prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September 1-5, 2004.
Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2006. “What’s the Matter with What’s the Matter with Kansas?” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1:201-26.
Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Google Scholar
Bernstein, Robert A. 1989. Elections, Representation and Congressional Voting Behavior: The Myth of Constituency Control. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Bianco, William T., Spence, John B., Wilkerson, John D. 1996. “The Electoral Connection in the Early Congress: The Case of the Compensation Act of 1816.” American Journal of Political Science 40:145-71.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bishin, Benjamin G. 2000. “Constituency Influence in Congress: Does Subconstituency Matter?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25:389-415.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bishin, Benjamin G. 2009. Tyranny of the Minority: The Subconstituency Politics Theory of Representation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas . 2012. “Does the Numerical Underrepresentation of the Working Class in Congress Matter? Evidence from Roll Call Voting in the House of Representatives.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 37:5-34.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Clausen, Aage . 1973. How Congressmen Decide: A Policy Focus. New York: St. Martins Press.
Google Scholar
Clinton, Joshua D. 2006. “Representation in Congress: Constituents and Roll Calls in the 106th House.” The Journal of Politics 68:397-409.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Converse, Philip E. 1990. “Popular Representation and the Distribution of Information.” In Information and Democratic Processes, edited by Ferejohn, John A, Kuklinski, James H., 369-88. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Google Scholar
Cox, Gary W., McCubbins, Mathew. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Dahl, Robert A. 1956. A Preface to Democratic Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael, Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Dennis, Christopher . 1998. “Support for Campaign Spending Limitations in the U.S. Senate: The Role of Party, Ideology and Electoral Security.” Journal of Socio-Economics 27:641-49.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Dennis, Christopher, Medoff, Marshall H., Gagnier, Michele N. 1998. “The Impact of Racially Disproportionate Outcomes on Public Policy: The U.S. Senate and the Death Penalty.” Social Science Journal 35:169-81.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Elling, Richard C. 1982. “Ideological Change in the U.S. Senate: Time and Electoral Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7:75-92.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Erikson, Robert S. 1978. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior: A Reexamination of the Miller-Stokes Representation Data.” American Journal of Political Science 22:511-35.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, Park, David, Shor, Boris, Bafumi, Joseph, Cortina, Jeronimo. 2008. Red State, Blue State, Rich State, Poor State: Why Americans Vote the Way They Do. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Gerring, John . 2007. Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin . 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69:778-96.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Graetz, Michael J., Shapiro, Ian. 2005. Death by a Thousand Cuts: The Fight over Taxing Inherited Wealth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Griffin, John D., Newman, Brian. 2005. “Are Voters Better Represented?” The Journal of Politics 67:1206-27.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hibbs, Douglas A. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policy.” American Political Science Review 71:1467-87.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hibbs, Douglas A., Dennis, Christopher. 1988. “Income Distribution in the United States.” American Political Science Review 82:467-90.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hill, Kim Quaile, Leighley, Jan E. 1992. “The Policy Consequences of Class Bias in State Electorates.” American Journal of Political Science 36:351-65.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hutchings, Vincent L. 1998. “Issue Salience and Support for Civil Rights Legislation among Southern Democrats.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (November): 521-44.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Keister, Lisa A., Moller, Stephanie. 2000. “Wealth Inequality in the United States.” Annual Review of Sociology 26:63-81.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kingdon, John . 1977. “Models of Legislative Voting.” The Journal of Politics 39:563-97.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Koger, Gregory . 2010. Filibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Margasak, Larry . 2001. “Democrats Take Control of Senate.” The Washington Post, May 24. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/aponline/20010524/aponline115347_000.htm
Google Scholar
Martin, Paul S. 2003. “Voting’s Rewards: Voter Turnout, Attentive Publics, and Congressional Allocation of Federal Money.” American Journal of Political Science 47:110-27.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized American: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
McClosky, Herbert, Zaller, John. 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Miller, Warren E., Stokes, Donald E. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57:45-56.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Page, Benjamin I., Shapiro, Robert Y., Gronke, Paul, Rosenberg, Robert M. 1984. “Constituency, Party, and Representation in Congress.” Public Opinion Quarterly 48:741-56.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Piketty, Thomas, Saez, Emmanuel. 2003. “Income Inequality in the United States, 1913-1998.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118:1-39.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pitkin, Hannah Fenichel . 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Poole, Keith T. 2003. “Changing Minds? Not in Congress!” Working Paper. http://www.voteview.com/chminds.pdf
Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Schumaker, Paul D., Getter, Russell W. 1977. “Responsiveness Bias in 51 American Communities.” American Journal of Political Science 21:247-81.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sekhon, Jasjeet S., Titiunik, Rocio. 2012. “When Natural Experiments Are Neither Natural Nor Experiments.” American Political Science Review 106:35-57.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Stimson, James . 2004. Tides of Consent: How Public Opinion Shapes American Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stonecash, Jeffrey M. 2000. Class and Party in American Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.
Google Scholar
Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy . 2004. “American Democracy in an Age of Rising Inequality.” Perspectives on Politics 2:651-66.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Brady, Henry E. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Nie, Norman H., Kim, Jae-on. 1978. Participation and Political Equality: A Seven-Nation Comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey A., Page, Benjamin I. 2009. “Oligarchy in the United States?” Perspectives on Politics 7:731-51.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wolfinger, Raymond E., Rosenstone, Steven J. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Access

    does not have access to this content.

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

PRQ-article-ppv for $37.50

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top