![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Recent scholarship rejects campaign finance as a cause of women’s underrepresentation in Congress because women raise as much money as men running in similar races. We argue that campaign finance still impacts which women can make a run for office because candidates have to build their own donor networks. Using a unique dataset that includes primary and general election candidates for the U.S. House in 2010 and 2012, we examine the gender composition of candidates’ donor networks. We find that candidates’ ideological views are very important to contributors. Donors, particularly Democrats, also exhibit a gender affinity effect in which men give more to male candidates and women favor female candidates. Furthermore, female Democratic donors seem to value the election of women, especially liberal Democratic women, over other traditional predictors of giving, such as incumbency and competitiveness. Meanwhile, Republican male and female donors do not focus on candidate gender, and female Republican donors prefer conservative candidates. Thus, the existing partisan donor pools are friendlier to the emergence of liberal female Democrats than Republican women.
References
|
Barber, Michael . 2016a. “Donation Motivations: Testing Theories of Access and Ideology.” Political Research Quarterly 69:148–59. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Barber, Michael . 2016b. “Ideological Donors, Contribution Limits, and the Polarization of American Legislatures.” Journal of Politics 78:296–310. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Barber, Michael, Butler, Daniel, Preece, Jessica. 2016. “Gender Inequalities in Campaign Finance.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 11:219–48. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands, and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10:571–97. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Boatright, Robert G. 2013. Getting Primaried: The Changing Politics of Congressional Primary Challenges. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Bonica, Adam . 2013. “Database on Ideology, Money in Politics, and Elections: Public version 1.0” [Computer file]. Stanford University Libraries, Stanford. http://data.stanford.edu/dime (accessed February 20, 2017). Google Scholar | |
|
Bonica, Adam . 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 58:367–86. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Brodey, Sam . 2015. “Rep. Keith Ellison on Why He Is Backing Bernie Sanders for President.” MinnPost, October 12. https://www.minnpost.com/dc-dispatches/2015/10/rep-keith-ellison-why-hes-backing-bernie-sanders-president. Google Scholar | |
|
Bryner, Sarah, Weber, Doug. 2013. “Sex, Money and Politics: A Center for Responsive Politics Report on Women as Donors and Candidates.” Center for Responsive Politics, Washington, DC. https://www.opensecrets.org/news/reports/gender.php (accessed February 20, 2017). Google Scholar | |
|
Burns, Nancy, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Verba, Sidney. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Burrell, Barbara . 1994. A Woman’s Place Is in the House: Campaigning for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Burrell, Barbara . 2010. “Political Parties and Women’s Organizations: Bringing Women into the Electoral Arena.” In Gender and Elections: Shaping the Future of American Politics, edited by Carroll, Susan J., Fox, Richard L., 2nd ed, 210–38. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Burrell, Barbara . 2014. Gender in Campaigns for the US House of Representatives. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Carney, Eliza Newlin . 2014. “GOP Struggles with Fundraising for Women’s Initiatives | Rules of the Game.” Roll Call, July 22. http://blogs.rollcall.com/beltway-insiders/gop-women-raise-cash-but-still-not-enough-rules-of-the-game/?dcz (accessed February 20, 2017). Google Scholar | |
|
Carroll, Susan J., Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2014. More Women Can Run: Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Center for American Women and Politics . 2016. “Fact Sheet: Women in the U.S. Congress 2016.” Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. Google Scholar | |
|
Center for Responsive Politics . 2014. “Election Stats.” https://www.opensecrets.org/overview/index.php (accessed September 22, 2014). Google Scholar | |
|
Crespin, Michael H., Dietz, Janna L.2010. “If You Can’t Join ’Em, Beat ’Em: The Gender Gap in Individual Donations to Congressional Candidates.” Political Research Quarterly 63:581–93. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Crowder-Meyer, Melody, Cooperman, Rosalyn. 2015. “Can’t Buy Them Love: How Party Culture among Donors Contributes to the Party Gap in Women’s Representation.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Google Scholar | |
|
Dabelko, Kristen La Cour, Herrnson, Paul S. 1997. “Women’s and Men’s Campaigns for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 50:121–35. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Dolan, Julie, Deckman, Melissa, Swers, Michele. 2016. Women and Politics: Paths to Power and Political Influence. 3rd ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. Google Scholar | |
|
Dolan, Kathleen . 2008. “Is There a ‘Gender Affinity Effect’ in American Politics? Information, Affect, and Candidate Sex in U.S. House Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 61:79–89. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Ensley, Michael J. 2009. “Individual Campaign Contributions and Candidate Ideology.” Public Choice 138:221–38. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Fiber, Pamela, Fox, Richard L. 2005. “A Tougher Road for Women? Assessing the Role of Gender in Congressional Elections.” In Gender and American Politics: Women, Men, and the Political Process, edited by Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue, Josephson, Jyl J., 2nd ed, 48–63. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe. Google Scholar | |
|
Francia, Peter L. 2001. “Early Fundraising by Non-incumbent Female Congressional Candidates.” Women & Politics 23:7–20. Google Scholar | |
|
Francia, Peter L., Green, John C., Herrnson, Paul S., Powell, Lynda W., Wilcox, Clyde. 2003. The Financiers of Congressional Elections. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Francia, Peter L., Green, John C., Herrnson, Paul S., Powell, Lynda W., Wilcox, Clyde. 2005. “Limousine Liberals and Corporate Conservatives: The Financial Constituencies of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Social Science Quarterly 86:761–78. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Freeman, Jo . 1986. “The Political Culture of the Democratic and Republican Parties.” Political Science Quarterly 101:327–56. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Gimpel, James G., Lee, Frances E., Kaminski, Joshua. 2006. “The Political Geography of Campaign Contributions.” Journal of Politics 68:626–39. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Gimpel, James G., Lee, Frances E., Pearson-Merkowitz, Shanna. 2008. “The Check Is in the Mail: Interdistrict Funding Flows in Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 52:373–94. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Green, Joanne Connor . 1998. “The Role of Gender in Open-Seat Elections for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Women & Politics 19:33–55. Google Scholar | |
|
Green, Joanne Connor . 2003. “The Times . . . Are They A-Changing? An Examination of the Impact of the Value of Campaign Resources for Women and Men Candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives.” Women & Politics 25:1–29. Google Scholar | |
|
Grossmann, Matt, Hopkins, David A. 2015. “Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats: The Asymmetry of American Party Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 13:119–39. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Herrnson, Paul S. 2012. Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington. 6th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Hogan, Robert E. 2007. “The Effects of Candidate Gender on Campaign Spending in State Legislative Elections.” Social Science Quarterly 88:1092–105. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Jacobson, Gary C. 2013. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 8th ed. Boston: Pearson Education. Google Scholar | |
|
Johnson, Bertram . 2010. “Individual Contributions: A Fundraising Advantage for the Ideologically Extreme?” American Politics Research 38:890–908. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Karpowitz, Christopher F, Monson, Quin J., Patterson, Kelly D., Pope, Jeremy C. 2011. “Tea Time in America? The Impact of the Tea Party Movement on the 2010 Midterm Elections.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44:303–09. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Kitchens, Karin E., Swers, Michele L. 2016. “Why Aren’t There More Republican Women in Congress: Gender, Partisanship, and Fundraising Support in the 2010 and 2012 Elections.” Politics & Gender 12:648–76. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
La Raja, Raymond J., Schaffner, Brian F. 2015. Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar | |
|
National Council for Research on Women, Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University’s Eagleton Institute on Politics, and Center for Responsive Politics . 2014. “Money in Politics with a Gender Lens.” January. https://www.icrw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/moneyinpoliticswithagenderlens_0.pdf (accessed February 20, 2017). Google Scholar | |
|
Palmer, Barbara, Simon, Dennis. 2012. Women & Congressional Elections: A Century of Change. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Google Scholar | |
|
Pearson, Kathryn, McGhee, Eric. 2013. “What It Takes to Win: Questioning ‘Gender Neutral’ Outcomes in U.S. House Elections.” Politics & Gender 9:439–62. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Poole, Keith T., Rosenthal, Howard. 2007. Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Google Scholar | |
|
Sanbonmatsu, Kira . 2002. Gender Equality, Political Parties, and the Politics of Women’s Place. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Schreiber, Ronnee . 2008. Righting Feminism: Conservative Women & American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Shor, Boris, McCarty, Nolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 105:530–51. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Swers, Michele . 2013. Women in the Club: Gender and Policy Making in the Senate. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Thomsen, Danielle M. 2014. “Ideological Moderates Won’t Run: How Party Fit Matters for Partisan Polarization in Congress.” Journal of Politics 76:786–97. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Thomsen, Danielle M. 2015. “Why so Few (Republican) Women? Explaining the Partisan Imbalance of Women in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40:295–323. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Wingerter, Justin . 2016. “Rep. Tim Huelskamp Endorses Ted Cruz for President.” The Topeka Capital-Journal. Published electronically February 16. http://cjonline.com/news-local-state/2016-02-16/rep-tim-huelskamp-endorses-ted-cruz-president. Google Scholar | |
|
Wolbrecht, Christina . 2000. The Politics of Women’s Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar |
