A Climate Backlash: Comparing Populist Parties’ Climate Policies in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden

First Published June 23, 2021 Research Article

Authors

1
 
Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Finland
by this author
, 2
 
Swedish Institute of International Affairs, Sweden

by this author
, 3
 
Danish Institute for International Studies, Denmark
by this author
...
First Published Online: June 23, 2021

The rise of authoritarian populism has disrupted the patterns of party competition in many Western societies. Related to this development, the current debates in the United States and European Union illustrate how empirical science on climate change may become intensely politicized, and all ambitious climate policies challenged in the contemporary political landscape. We set out an analytical framework with three ideal types of political strategies for opposing climate policies: climate science denialism, climate policy nationalism, and climate policy conservativism. Empirically, the article investigates populist resistance to ambitious climate change policy in the Nordic context, where countries have sought to assume global leadership in climate politics and have considerable public support for climate action. In an analysis of the evolving positions of populist parties in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden in recent elections, the article sheds light on the interconnection between populism and climate change policy.

Anshelm, J., Hultman, M. (2014). A green fatwā? Climate change as a threat to the masculinity of industrial modernity. Norma, 9(2), 84-96.
Google Scholar
Bäckstrand, K., Kronsell, A (2015). Rethinking the green state: Environmental governance towards climate and sustainability transitions. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Boussalis, C., Coan, T. G. (2016). Text-mining the signals of climate change doubt. Global Environmental Change, 36(1), 89-100.
Google Scholar
Brown, M. B. (2014). “Climate science, populism, and the democracy of rejection”. In Crow, D. A., Boykoff, M. T. (Eds.), Culture, politics and climate change: How information shapes oud future. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Cann, H. W., Raymond, L. (2018). Does climate denialism still matter? The prevalence of alternative frames in opposition to climate policy. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 433-454.
Google Scholar
Dansk Folkeparti (2019). Et grønt Danmark med borgeren i centrum: Klimapolitik. Available at: https://danskfolkeparti.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Et_groent_Danmark_tryk_1.pdf. September 2019.
Google Scholar
Dubash, N. (2019). “The Nationalist Hindrance to Climate Actions”. The Hindu. 23 September 2019.
Google Scholar
Fischer, F. (2019). Knowledge politics and post-truth in climate denial: On the social construction of alternative facts. Critical Policy Studies, 13(2), 133-152.
Google Scholar
Forchtner, B., Kølvraa, C. (2015). The nature of Nationalism: Populist radical right parties on countryside and climate. Nature and Culture, 10(2), 199-224.
Google Scholar
Forchtner, B., Kroneder, A., Wetzel, D. (2018). “Being skeptical? Exploring far-right climate-change communication in Germany”. Environmental Communication, 12(5), 589-604.
Google Scholar
Gemenis, K., Katsanidou, A., Vasilopoulou, S. (2012). The politics of anti-environmentalism: positional issue framing by the European radical right. In 62nd Annual political studies association conference 2012, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Google Scholar
Hatakka, N., Välimäki, M (2019). The allure of exploding bats: The Finns Party’s populist environmental communication and the media. In Forchtner, B (Ed.), The Far Right and the Environment: Politics, Discourse and Communication. Routledge.
Google Scholar
Hoffman, A. J. (2011). Talking past each other? cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment, 24(1), 3-33.
Google Scholar
Huber, R. (2020). “The role of populist attitudes in explaining climate change skepticism and support for environmental protection”. Environmental Politics, 29(6), 124.
Google Scholar
Huber, R. A., Maltby, T., Szulecki, K., Cetkovic, S. (2021). “Is populism a challenge to European energy and climate policy? Empirical evidence across varieties of populism”. Journal of European Public Policy (forthcoming).
Google Scholar
Hultman, M., Björk, A., Viinikka, T (2019). Denouncing environmental challenges via anti-establishment rhetoric, marketing of doubts, industrial/breadwinner masculinities enactments and ethno- nationalism”. In Forchtner, B (Ed.), The far right and the environment: politics, discourse and communication. Routledge.
Google Scholar
IPCC (2018). “Global warming of 1.5 degrees”. IPCC Special Report. Available at. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/.
Google Scholar
Jacques, P. (2006). “The rearguard of modernity: environmental skepticism as a struggle of citizenship. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 76101.
Google Scholar
Jacques, P. J., Riley, E. D., Freeman, M. (2008). “The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism”. Environmental Politics, 17, 349-385.
Google Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Ripberger, J. T., Silva, C. L., Carlson, D. E., Gupta, K., Nina, C. A. T. M., Dunlap, R. E. (2020). “Partisan asymmetry in temporal stability of climate change beliefs”. Nature Climate Change, 10, 322-328.
Google Scholar
Kjærsgaard, P., Carlsen, J. (2013). Fordi jeg var nødt til det. People’s Press, Copenhagen.
Google Scholar
Krange, O., Kaltenborn, B., Hultman, M. (2019). Cool dudes in Norway: Climate change denial among conservative Norwegian men. Environmental Sociology, 5(1), 1-11
Google Scholar
Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis: A guide to methods, practice and using software. Sage Publishing.
Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (1977). “Towards a theory of populism. In Politics and ideology in Marxist Thought: Capitalism, Fascism, Populism. New Left Books.
Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
Google Scholar
Lewandowsky, S., Naomi, O., James, S. R., Ben, R. N., Smithson, M. (2015). “Climate change denial and its effect on the scientific community”. Global Environmental Change, 33(1), 1-13.
Google Scholar
Lockwood, M. (2018). “Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages”. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712-732.
Google Scholar
McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. (2011). The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American publicʼs views of global warming, 2001-2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52(2), 155-194.
Google Scholar
McKie, R. E . (2019). Climate change counter movement neutralization techniques: A typology to examine the climate change counter movement. Sociological Inquiry, 89(2), 288-316.
Google Scholar
Mudde, C., Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Müller, W. J. (2017). What is Populism? University of Pennsylvania Press.
Google Scholar
Nisbet, M. (2009). “Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement”. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12-23.
Google Scholar
Norris, P., Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit and Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Oreskes, N., Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Google Scholar
Perussuomalaiset (2019). “Perussuomailainen ympäristö- ja energiapolitiikka”. Available at: https://www.perussuomalaiset.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/Ymparisto_ja_energiapolitiikka_15.1.2019.pdf.
Google Scholar
Poortinga, W., Spence, A., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 1015-1024.
Google Scholar
Rahmstorf, S. (2004), “The climate sceptics”, potsdam Institute for climate impact. Available at: http://www.pik-potsdam.de/∼stefan/Publications/Other/rahmstorf_climate_sceptics_2004.pdf.
Google Scholar
Schaller, S., Carius, A. (2019), Convenient truths: Mapping climate agendas of right-wing populist parties in Europe. Adelphi.
Google Scholar
Schmid-Petri, H. (2017), “Politicization of science: how climate change skeptics use experts and scientific evidence in their online communication”. Climatic Change, 145(3-4), 523-537.
Google Scholar
Skoglund, A., Stripple, J. (2019). From climate skeptic to climate cynic. Critical Policy Studies, 13(3), 345-365.
Google Scholar
SMHI (2018). “Statistik juli – lufttemperatur och vind”, Swedish meteorological and hydrological institute. Available at: https://www.smhi.se/pd/klimat/pdf_stats/month/SMHI_vov_temperature_wind_jul18.pdf.
Google Scholar
Sverigedemokraterna (2018). Valmanifest: Sverigedemokraternas valmanifest 2018. Available at: https://sd.se/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Valmanifest-2018-1.pdf.
Google Scholar
The Finns Party (2019a). The Finns party’s election program 2019. Available at: https://www.perussuomalaiset.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Eduskuntavaaliohjelma-2019_SU_In_English_1.pdf.
Google Scholar
The Finns Party (2019b). The Finns party’s European union policy. Available at: https://www.perussuomalaiset.fi/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/EUpolitiikkaENG_2019.pdf.
Google Scholar
Tiihonen, A., Vadén, S. (2019). “Eduskuntavaalit 2019 – Ilmastovaalit?”. Politiikasta. Available at: https://politiikasta.fi/eduskuntavaalit-2019-ilmastovaalit/. 10 June 2019.
Google Scholar
Tranter, B., Booth, K. (2015). Scepticism in a changing climate: A cross-national study. Global Environmental Change, 33(1), 154-164.
Google Scholar
Turkkila, M. (2019). “Lapsi, joka komensi paavia – järki ja tunteet ilmastokeskustelussa”. In Ympäristörealistin Käsikirja. Suomen Perusta.
Google Scholar
Van Rensburg, W. (2015). Climate change sceptical frames: A Conceptual Re-Evaluation. SAGE Open, 5(1), 1-13.
Google Scholar
Van Rensburg, W., Head, B. W. (2017). Climate change sceptical frames: The case of seven Australian sceptics. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 63(1), 112-128.
Google Scholar
Weinert, F. (1996). “Weberʼs ideal types as models in the social sciences”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements, 41, 73-93.
Google Scholar
Ylä-Anttila, T. (2017). The populist toolkit: Finnish populism in action 2007-2016. (University of Helsinki).
Google Scholar

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

JED-article-ppv for GBP29.00
JED-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP247.60
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $296.66