![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
The present study is the largest and most rigorous study to date on the effects of being appointed a Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) on permanency outcomes of children in foster care. The intent-to-treat study accounts for selection bias by applying inverse probability weighting to logistic and sequential logistic regressions in a large sample of children in foster care in the state of Texas (N = 31,754). Overall, children appointed a CASA have significantly lower odds than children without a CASA of achieving permanency. They have lower odds of being reunified, greater odds of being adopted (if not reunified), and lower odds of being placed in permanent kin guardianship (if not reunified or adopted) than children who are not appointed CASA. This study makes an additional contribution by looking beyond the aggregate effect of CASA on permanency by examining the effect of CASA for different age groups and different types of first placement after removal.
Keywords
References
|
Abramson, S. (1991). Use of court-appointed advocates to assist in permanency planning for minority children. Child Welfare, 70, 477–487. Google Scholar | Medline | |
|
Administration for Children and Families . (2017, November 30). The AFCARS report. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/afcarsreport24.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Austin, P. C., Stuart, E. A. (2015). Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Statistics in Medicine, 34, 3661–3679. doi:10.1002/sim.6607 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Bell, T., Romano, E. (2015). Permanency and safety among children in foster family and kinship care: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 18, 268–286. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Caliber Associates . (2004). Evaluation of CASA representation: Final report. Fairfax, VA: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, 42 U.S.C. § 5106a(2)(B)(ii) . (2017). Google Scholar | |
|
Child Welfare Information Gateway . (2012, February). Supporting reunification and preventing reentry into out-of-home care. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.690.2516&rep=rep1&type=pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Condelli, L. (1988). National evaluation of the impact of guardians ad litem in child abuse and neglect judicial proceedings. Washington, DC: CSR, Google Scholar | |
|
Courtney, M., Wong, Y. I. (1996). Comparing the timing of exits from substitute care. Children and Youth Services Review, 18, 307–334. doi:10.1016/0190-7409(96)00008-4 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Font, S. A., Berger, L. M., Cancian, M., Noyes, J. L. (2018). Permanency and the educational and economic attainment of former foster children in early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 83, 716–743. doi:10.1177/0003122418781791 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Heflinger, C. A., Simpkins, C. G., Combs-Orme, T. (2000). Using the CBCL to determine the clinical status of children in state custody. Children and Youth Services Review, 22, 55–73. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hernán, M. A., Robins, J. M. (2019). Causal inference. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC. Google Scholar | |
|
Knorth, E. J., Harder, A. T., Zandberg, T., Kendrick, A. J. (2008). Under one roof: A review and selective meta-analysis on the outcomes of residential child and youth care. Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 123–140. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lawson, J., Berrick, J. D. (2013). Establishing CASA as an evidence-based practice. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 10, 321–337. doi:10.1080/15433714.2012.663674 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Litzelfelner, P. (2000). The effectiveness of CASAs in achieving positive outcomes for children. Child Welfare, 79, 179–193. Google Scholar | Medline | |
|
Litzelfelner, P. (2008). Consumer satisfaction with CASAs (Court Appointed Special Advocates). Children and Youth Services Review, 30, 173–186. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.09.004 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
National Court Appointed Special Advocate Association . (2017). Anything is possible when someone cares. Seattle, WA. Retrieved from http://nc.casaforchildren.org/files/public/site/communications/Annual%20Report%20and%20Financials/NCASA_2017_AnnualReport.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Osborne, C., Warner-Doe, H., Lawson, J. (2018). Who gets a casa? selective characteristics of children appointed a casa advocate. Children and Youth Service Review, 98, 65–71. Google Scholar | |
|
Pilkay, S., Lee, S. (2015). Effects of court appointed special advocate intervention on permanency outcomes of children in foster care. Journal of Social Service Research, 41, 445–453. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Piraino, M. S. (1999). Lay representation of abused and neglected children: Variations of court appointed special advocate programs and their relationship to quality advocacy. Journal of the Center for Children and the Courts, 1, 63–71. Google Scholar | |
|
Poertner, J., Press, A. (1990). Representation of children in child abuse and neglect cases. A comparison of court appointed special advocates with staff attorney models: Who best represents the interest of child in court? Child Welfare, 69, 537–549. Google Scholar | Medline | |
|
Siegel, G. C., Halemba, G. J., Gunn, R. D., Zawacki, S., Bozynski, M., Black, M. S. (2001). Arizona CASA effectiveness study. Pittsburgh, PA: National Center for Juvenile Justice. Google Scholar | |
|
Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 671(a)(15) . (2006). Google Scholar | |
|
Tarren-Sweeney, M., Hazell, P. (2006). Mental health of children in foster and kinship care in New South Wales, Australia. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 42, 89–97. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Texas Court Appointed Special Advocate . (2018). The CASA eVOLution. Retrieve from https://35xs6u1zhs1u1p3cy926rkn4-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/CASA-eVOLution_Final.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services . (2017a). CPS policy handbook. Section 6234: Prioritizing permanency goals. Retrieved from https://www.dfps.state.tx.us/handbooks/CPS/Files/CPS_pg_6200.asp#CPS_6234 Google Scholar | |
|
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services . (2017b). CPS policy handbook. Section 10200 preparation for adult living (PAL). Retrieved from http://www.dfps.state.tx.us/handbooks/CPS/Files/CPS_pg_x10200.asp Google Scholar | |
|
Waxman, H. C., Houston, W. R., Profilet, S. M., Sanchez, B. (2009). The long-term effects of the Houston child advocates, Inc., program on children and family outcomes. Child Welfare, 88, 25–48. Google Scholar | Medline | |
|
Youngclarke, D., Dyer Ramos, K., Granger-Merkle, L. (2004). A systematic review of the impact of court appointed special advocates. Journal of the Center for Families, Children, & the Courts, 5, 109–126. Google Scholar |
