Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 15, 2014

Are They Well Situated? Spatial Analysis of Privately Owned Public Space, Manhattan, New York City

Abstract

In this article, we attempt to examine how privately owned public spaces through incentive zoning have played out as a means to generate public spaces, as part of improving spatial equity in Manhattan, New York City. Using spatial statistical analyses, we find that the inclusion of privately owned public spaces reduces overall average distance to the nearest public space from both working and living population, and helps to balance the distribution of the public spaces throughout the city, by covering the locations where publicly owned public spaces are sparse. More importantly, the location of privately owned public spaces closely aligns with potential demand from the working and tourist population, though not from the resident population. We extend the findings to policy, suggesting that allocation of privately owned public space should be implemented comprehensively rather than discretely, as well as in relationship to publicly owned public spaces, to sharpen their role in achieving fair distribution of public spaces throughout the city.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Apparicio P., Abdelmajid M., Riva M., Shearmur R. 2008. “Comparing Alternative Approaches to Measuring the Geographical Accessibility of Urban Health Services: Distance Types and Aggregation-Error Issues.” International Journal of Health Geographics 7 (1): 7.
Apparicio P., Cloutier M., Shearmur R. 2007. “The Case of Montreal’s Missing Food Deserts: Evaluation of Accessibility to Food Supermarkets.” International Journal of Health Geographics 6 (1): 4.
Banerjee T. 2001. “The Future of Public Space: Beyond Invented Streets and Reinvented Places.” Journal of the American Planning Association 67 (1): 9–24.
City of New York, City Planning Commission, Department of City Planning. 1961. Zoning Maps and Resolution. City of New York, City Planning Commission, Department of City Planning : New York.
City of New York, Department of City Planning. 2013. Privately Owned Public Spaces. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dcp/html/pops/pops.shtml.
City of New York, Parks & Recreation. 2013. A Timeline of New York City Department of Parks & Recreation History. http://www.nycgovparks.org/about/history/timeline.
Comber A., Brunsdon C., Green E. 2008. “Using a GIS-Based Network Analysis to Determine Urban Greenspace Accessibility for Different Ethnic and Religious Groups.” Landscape and Urban Planning 86 (1): 103–14.
Cranz G. 1992. The Politics of Park Design: A History of Urban Parks in America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dignan J. 1983. “Policy-Making, Local Authorities and the Courts: The ‘GLC Fares’ Case.” Law Quarterly Review 99:605–46.
Graham S., Aurigi A. 1997. “Virtual Cities, Social Polarization, and the Crisis in Urban Public Space.” The Journal of Urban Technology 4 (1): 19–52.
Harnik P. 2010. Urban Green: Innovative Parks for Resurgent Cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Hay A. M. 1995. “Concepts of Equity, Fairness and Justice in Geographical Studies.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 20 (4): 500–508.
Hewko J., Smoyer-Tomic K. E., Hodgson M. J. 2002. “Measuring Neighbourhood Spatial Accessibility to Urban Amenities: Does Aggregation Error Matter?” Environment and Planning A 34 (7): 1185–206.
Judd D. 2000. “Strong Leadership.” Urban Studies 37 (5–6): 951–61.
Judd D., Smith M. P. 1983. Restructuring the City: The Political Economy of Urban Redevelopment. New York: Longman.
Katz C. 2006. “Power, Space, and Terror: Social Reproduction and the Public Environment.” In The Politics of Public Space edited by Low S., Smith N., 105–21. New York: Routledge.
Kayden J. 1978. Incentive Zoning in New York City: A Cost-Benefit Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
Kayden J. 2005. “Using and Misusing Law to Design the Public Realm.” In Regulating Place: Standards and the Shaping of Urban America, edited by Ben-Joseph E., Szold T. S., 115–40.
Kayden J. 2000 “The New York City Department of Planning, and The Municipal Art Society.”. Privately Owned Public Space: The New York City Experience. New York: John Wiley.
Kevin B. 2004. The New York Waterfront: Evolution and Building Culture of the Port and Harbor. New York: The Monacelli Press.
King J. 2014. “Privately Owned Public Spaces: Guidance Needed.” SFGate, April 9. http://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/place/article/Privately-owned-public-spaces-Guidance-needed-3342258.php.
Low S. 2006. “How Private Interests Take over Public Space: Zoning, Taxes, and Incorporation of Gated Communities.” In The Politics of Public Space, edited by Low S., Smith N., 81–104. New York: Routledge.
Lucy W. 1981. “Equity and Planning for Local Services.” Journal of the American Planning Association 47 (4): 447–57.
Luo W. 2004. “Using a GIS-Based Floating Catchment Method to Assess Areas with Shortage of Physicians.” Health & Place 10 (1): 1–11.
Luo W., Wang F. 2003. “Measures of Spatial Accessibility to Health Care in a GIS Environment: Synthesis and a Case Study in the Chicago Region.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 30 (6): 865–84.
Madden D. J. 2010. “Revisiting the End of Public Space: Assembling the Public in an Urban Park.” City & Community 9 (2): 187–207.
McGrail M. R., Humphreys J. S. 2009. “Measuring Spatial Accessibility to Primary Care in Rural Areas: Improving the Effectiveness of the Two-Step Floating Catchment Area Method.” Applied Geography 29 (4): 533–41.
Mitchell D. 1995. “The End of Public Space? People’s Park, Definitions of the Public, and Democracy.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85 (1): 108–33.
Németh J. 2009. “Defining a Public: The Management of Privately Owned Public Space.” Urban Studies 46 (11): 2463–90.
Németh J., Schmidt S. 2011. “The Privatization of Public Space: Modeling and Measuring Publicness.” Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 38 (1): 5–23.
New Yorkers for Parks. 2009. City Council District Profiles. New York.
OKADA&CO. 2011. Okada & Company Annual Report 2011. New York: OKADA&CO. http://www.okadaco.com/news.asp?rec_id=100050.
O’Sullivan D., Unwin D. J. 2010. Geographic Information Analysis. John Wiley.
Pearce J., Witten K., Bartie P. 2006. “Neighbourhoods and Health: A GIS Approach to Measuring Community Resource Accessibility.” Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 60 (5): 389–95.
Rusche K., Kies U., Schulte A. 2011. “Measuring Spatial Co-agglomeration Patterns by Extending ESDA Techniques.” Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft 31 (1): 11–25.
Smithsimon G. 2008. “Dispersing the Crowd Bonus Plazas and the Creation of Public Space.” Urban Affairs Review 43 (3): 325–51.
Smoyer-Tomic K. E., Hewko J. N., Hodgson M. J. 2004. “Spatial Accessibility and Equity of Playgrounds in Edmonton, Canada.” The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien 48 (3): 287–302.
SPUR. 2009. Secret of San Francisco. Urbanist 30, January 1. http://www.spur.org/publications/spur-report/2009-01-01/secrets-san-francisco.
Talen E. 2010. “The Spatial Logic of Parks.” Journal of Urban Design 15 (4): 473–91.
Talen E., Anselin L. 1998. “Assessing Spatial Equity: An Evaluation of Measures of Accessibility to Public Playgrounds.” Environment and Planning A 30:595–614.
The Municipal Art Society of New York., and Kayden. 2012. Advocates for Privately Owned Public Space (APOPS). http://www.mas.org/urbanplanning/apops/.
Whyte W. H. 1988. City: Rediscovering the Center. New York: Doubleday.
Witten K., Exeter D., Field A. 2003. “The Quality of Urban Environments: Mapping Variation in Access to Community Resources.” Urban Studies 40 (1): 161–77.

Biographies

Heeyeun Yoon is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural Systems Engineering at College of Agriculture and Life Science, Seoul National University. Her research focuses on urban parks and open spaces, their broader roles and benefits to the society.
Sumeeta Srinivasan is a Preceptor in Geospatial Methods in the Department of Government at Harvard University. Her research focuses on urban geography, transportation and the use of quantitative methods to study cities.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 15, 2014
Issue published: May 2015

Keywords

  1. Privately owned public space
  2. spatial equity
  3. accessibility
  4. demand
  5. spatial analysis

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2014.
Request permissions for this article.

History

Published online: October 15, 2014
Issue published: May 2015

Authors

Affiliations

Heeyeun Yoon
Seoul National University, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural Systems Engineering, Seoul, Korea
Sumeeta Srinivasan
Harvard University, Department of Government, Cambridge, MA, USA

Notes

Heeyeun Yoon, Seoul National University, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Department of Landscape Architecture and Rural Systems Engineering, Seoul, Korea. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Urban Affairs Review.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1653

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores


Articles citing this one

Web of Science: 11 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 8

  1. The effect of public space indicators on the rural district’s life qua...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Inclusive public open space for all: Spatial justice with health consi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. The effects of ‘publicness’ and quality of publicly accessible open sp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Do Silver Zones reduce auto-related elderly pedestrian collisions? Bas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Big Data Analysis to Observe Check-in Behavior Using Location-Based So...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Equal access to early childhood education in South Korea using the Geo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Geo-spatial analyses in education research: the critical challenge and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. The concept of urban intensity and China's townization policy: Cases f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

APSA Section 13 members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

APSA Section 13 members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text