As part of the European Union’s (EU) renewable energy and climate targets and its drive for sustainability, energy efficiency, and environmental protection, various elements of the defense sector in Europe are undertaking their own green initiatives. This is particularly important as the defense sector is one of the biggest public consumers of energy in the EU. This article asks to what extent, how, and why elements of the defense sector in Europe have engaged in greening. By examining four categories in a relevant typology of greening—ceremonial greening, holistic greening, regulatory greening, and competitive greening—this article argues that the defense sector in Europe is far from being a holistic green actor. Rather, Europe’s militaries, defense institutions, and defense firms exhibit a strong sense of self-interest in greening—embodied in defense market competition and regulation—and tend toward delegating green innovation to the market within an increasingly regulated context.

Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N. (2013). Green innovation and financial performance: An institutional approach. Organization & Environment, 26, 365-385.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bagaeen, S. G. (2006). Redeveloping former military sites: Competitiveness, urban sustainability and public participation. Cities, 23, 339-352.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bönigk, N., Dannemann, B. (2010). Solar park—Opportunities for biodiversity: A report on biodiversity in and around ground-mounted photovoltaic plants. Berlin: German Renewable Energies Agency.
Google Scholar
Brown, L. (2012). Full planet, empty plates: The new geopolitics of food security. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
Google Scholar
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946-967.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Coates, P., Cole, T., Dudley, M., Pearson, C. (2011). Defending nation, defending nature? Militarized landscapes and military environmentalism in Britain, France and the United States. Environmental History, 16, 456-491.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Coulson, M. (1995). The geography of defence: Developing themes of study. GeoJournal, 36, 371-382.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Dryzek, J. (1997). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Durant, R. F. (2007). The greening of the U.S. military: Environmental policy, national security, and organizational change. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Google Scholar
European Commission . (2011). A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050: Communications: COM (2011) 112 (Final).
Google Scholar
European Commission . (2012). Europe 2020 targets: Climate change and energy. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/themes/13_energy_and_ghg.pdf
Google Scholar
European Commission . (2013a). Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector: A new deal for European defence: COM (2013) 542 (Final).
Google Scholar
European Commission . (2013b). General report on REACH. February 5, 2013, COM (2013) 49 (Final).
Google Scholar
European Defence Agency . (2012a). European armed forces go green factsheet. Retrieved from http://www.eda.europa.eu/docs/documents/V3-Go_green_Factsheet_150312_CS5_vert
Google Scholar
European Defence Agency . (2012b). Military green: Energy and environment at the European Defence Agency. Retrieved from http://www.eda.europa.eu/docs/default-source/news/military-green-leaflet.pdf
Google Scholar
European Defence Agency . (2012c). Specifications for the request to participate in the competitive dialogue (Phase 1): Competitive dialogue EU armed forces go green (No: 12.ARM.CD.01).
Google Scholar
European Union . (2012). Military concept on environmental protection and energy efficiency for EU-led military operations (CSDP/PSDC 549 COSDP 762 13758/12).
Google Scholar
Fleck, D. (2013). The protection of the environment in armed conflict: Legal obligations in the absence of specific rules. Nordic Journal of International Law, 82, 7-20.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Forbes, L. C., Jermier, J. M. (2010). The new corporate environmentalism and the ecology of commerce. Organization & Environment, 23, 465-481.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Goodin, R. E. (1992). Green political theory. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Green, K., Morton, B., New, S. (2000). Greening organizations: Purchasing, consumption and innovation. Organization & Environment, 13, 206-225.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Halme, M. (2002). Corporate environmental paradigms in shift: learning during the course of action at UPM-Kymmene. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 1087-1109.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hamdouch, A., Depret, M.-H. (2010). Policy integration strategy and the development of the green economy: Foundations and implementation patterns. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53, 473-490.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Harris, L. C., Crane, A. (2002). The greening of organizational culture: Management views on the depth, degree and diffusion of change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15, 214-234.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Horvath, G., Blaho, M., Egri, A., Kriska, G., Seres, I., Robertson, B. (2010). Reducing the maladaptive attractiveness of solar panels to polarotactic insects. Conservation Biology, 24, 1644-1653.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Huber, J. (1982). The lost innocence of ecology: New technologies under superindustrial development.Frankfurt am main, Germany: Fisher Verlag.
Google Scholar
Hughes Butts, K . (1994). Why the military is good for the environment. In Käkönen, J. (Ed.), Green security or militarized environment (pp. 83-110). Aldershot, England: Dartmouth.
Google Scholar
Jänicke, M. (2008). Ecological modernisation: New perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16, 557-565.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jermier, J. M., Forbes, L. C. (2003). Greening organizations: Critical issues. In Alvesson, M., Willmott, H. (Eds.), Studying management critically (pp. 157-176). London, England: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lawrence, A., Morell, D. (1995). Leading-edge environmental management: Motivation, opportunity, resources and processes. In Collins, D., Starik, M. (Eds), Research in corporate social performance and policy—sustaining the natural environment: Empirical studies on the interface between nature and organizations (pp. 99-126). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Google Scholar
Lelong, G. (2012). Sustainable development, defence and the EU law making process. In European Defence Agency, Military Green 2012: Conference-exhibition-demonstration programme. Brussels.
Google Scholar
Natura 2000 . (2012). European protected areas—interactive map. Retrieved from http://www.eea.europa.eu/themes/biodiversity/interactive/natura2000gis/natura-2000-european-protected-areas.
Google Scholar
North Atlantic Treaty Organization . (2009). Weekly press briefing by NATO spokesman, James Appathurai, February 4, 2009. Retrieved from http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/opinions_51350.htm?selectedLocale=en
Google Scholar
North Atlantic Treaty Organization . (2013). Environmental protection, Retrieved from http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_80802.htm.
Google Scholar
Operation Free . (2012). Secure America with clean energy. Retrieved from http://www.operationfree.net/dod-energy/
Google Scholar
Orssatto, R. J., Clegg, S. R. (1999). The political ecology of organizations: Toward a framework for analyzing business-environment relationships. Organization & Environment, 12, 263-279.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Pirages, D. C. (1991). The greening of peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 28, 129-133.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Potoski, M., Prakash, A. (2005). Covenants with weak swords: ISO 14001 and facilities environmental performance. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 745-769.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Prakash, A. (2000). Greening the firm: The politics of corporate environmentalism. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
PriceWaterhouseCoopers . (2010). Aerospace and defence: Sector climate change responses. Retrieved from http://www.pwc.co.uk/en_UK/uk/assets/pdf/climate-change-in-aerospace-defence.pdf
Google Scholar
Ramos, T. B., Melo, J. (2005). Environmental management practices in the defence sector: Assessment of the Portuguese military’s environmental profile. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 1117-1130.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Reardon, S. (2012). Eco-warriors: US military pushes for green energy. New Scientist, 216(2889), 6-8.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Royal Society for the Protection of Birds . (2011). Solar power, RSPB briefing March 2011. Retrieved from http://www.rspb.org.uk/Images/Solar_power_briefing_tcm9-273329.pdf
Google Scholar
Sandström, J. (2004). Greening the Swedish defence material administration: A case study on the force of industry in environmental policy-making. European Environment, 14, 356-367.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Scott, R. W. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 493-511.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Spaargaren, G. (2003). Sustainable consumption: A theoretical and environmental policy perspective. Society & Natural Resources, 16, 687-701.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Spaargaren, G., Mol, A. P. J. (1992). Sociology, environment and modernity: Ecological modernization as a theory of social change. Society & Natural Resources, 5, 323-344.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Starik, M., Kanashiro, P. (2013). Toward a theory of sustainability management: Uncovering and integrating the nearly obvious. Organization & Environment, 26, 7-30.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Stockholm International Peace Research Institute . (2013). Military expenditure database. Retrieved from http://milexdata.sipri.org/files/?file=SIPRI+military+expenditure+database+1988-2012.xlsx
Google Scholar
Stubbs, W., Cocklin, C. (2008). Conceptualizing a sustainability business model. Organization & Environment, 21 103-127.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
U.K. Ministry of Defence . (2009). The REACH legislation: Guidance and processes for implementation in the Ministry of Defence. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/27715/20100817MoDREAChProcess.pdf
Google Scholar
U.K. Ministry of Defence . (2012a). Contract awarded for new DIO infrastructure management solution. Retrieved from http://www.mod.uk/DefenceInternet/DefenceNews/EstateAndEnvironment/ContractAwardedForNewDioInfrastructureManagementSolution.htm
Google Scholar
U.K. Ministry of Defence . (2012b). Greening Government Commitments Annual Report 2011-12. Retrieved from http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/CEE79C80-305E-4D4E-93DB-7D7ED435A27C/0/mod_ggc_annual_rpt_2011_12.pdf
Google Scholar
Wackernagel, M., Onisto, L., Bello, P., Linares Callejas, A., Lopez Falfan, I., Jesus Mendez Garcia, J., . . . Suarez Guerrero, G. (1999). National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 29, 375-390.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Winn, M. I., Pogutz, S. (2013). Business, ecosystems, and biodiversity: New horizons for management research. Organization & Environment, 26, 203-229.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Woodward, R. (1999). Gunning for rural England: The politics of the promotion of military land use in the Northumberland national park. Journal of Rural Studies, 15, 17-33.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Woodward, R. (2001). Khaki conservation: An examination of military environmentalist discourse in the British army. Journal of Rural Studies, 17, 201-217.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Zollo, M., Cennamo, C., Neumann, K. (2013). Beyond what and why: Understanding organizational evolution towards sustainable enterprise models. Organization & Environment, 26, 241-259.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Author Biography

Daniel Fiott is a researcher at the Institute for European Studies at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. His research work focuses on European defense technological and industrial cooperation and policies.

View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

OAE-article-ppv for $36.00