Contingency in Business Sustainability Research and in the Sustainability Service Industry: A Problematization and Research Agenda

First Published January 2, 2020 Research Article

Authors

1
 
The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia

by this author
First Published Online: January 2, 2020

A sustainability service industry has emerged that promotes the adoption of management tools, mechanisms, and procedures. This emergence took place despite a knowledge gap of how sustainability performance occurs in businesses. To understand practices amid the knowledge gap, this article explores through problematization how the performance orientations of practitioners and researchers relate to each other in the business sustainability field. The article unearths that like the sustainability service industry in practice, scholarship implicitly accepts assumptions of contingency in research designs. Because these implicit assumptions are unattended, it seems, to date, not possible for researchers to provide evidence-based guidance to practitioners on how to address business unsustainability. In addition, basic concepts of contingency are not yet established in this field to explain performance, rendering the acceptance of corresponding assumptions unfounded. The article concludes with research suggestions for the development of theory of sustainability performance in businesses.

Adams, C. A. (2002). Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15, 223-250.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Aguinis, H., Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38, 932-968.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Alvesson, M., Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36, 247-271.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Alvesson, M., Sandberg, J. (2013). Has management studies lost its way? Ideas for more imaginative and innovative research. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 128-152.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Aragón-Correa, J. A., Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28, 71-88.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ardito, L., Dangelico, R. M. (2018). Firm environmental performance under scrutiny: The role of strategic and organizational orientations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 426-440.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Baek, K. (2018). Sustainable development and pollutant outcomes: The case of ISO 14001 in Korea. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 825-832.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bansal, P. (2003). From issues to actions: The importance of individual concerns and organizational values in responding to natural environmental issues. Organization Science, 14, 510-527.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bansal, P., Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 717-736.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Baron, D. P. (1995). Integrated strategy: Market and nonmarket components. California Management Review, 37, 47-65.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Barry, M., Cashore, B., Clay, J., Fernandez, M., Lebel, L., Lyon, T., . . .Whelan, T. (2012). Toward sustainability: The roles and limitations of certification. Washington, DC: RESOLVE. Retrieved from http://www.resolv.org/site-assessment/towardsustainability/
Google Scholar
Bartunek, J. M., Rynes, S. L., Ireland, R. D. (2006). What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter? Academy of Management Journal, 49, 9-15.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Battilana, J., Leca, B., Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3, 65-107.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Belkhir, L., Bernard, S., Abdelgadir, S. (2017). Does GRI reporting impact environmental sustainability? A cross-industry analysis of CO2 emissions performance between GRI-reporting and non-reporting companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 28, 138-155.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Benn, S., Dunphy, D., Griffiths, A. (2014). Organizational change for corporate sustainability: A guide for leaders and change agents of the future (3rd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bjørn, A., Hauschild, M. Z. (2013). Absolute versus relative environmental sustainability: What can the cradle-to-cradle and eco-efficiency concepts learn from each other? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17, 321-332.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Boiral, O. (2007). Corporate greening through ISO 14001: A rational myth? Organization Science, 18, 127-146.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Boiral, O., Gendron, Y. (2011). Sustainable development and certification practices: Lessons learned and prospects. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20, 331-347.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Boiral, O., Henri, J.-F. (2017). Is sustainability performance comparable? A study of GRI reports of mining organizations. Business & Society, 56, 283-317.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Boiral, O., Raineri, N., Talbot, D. (2018). Managers’ citizenship behaviors for the environment: A developmental perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 149, 395-409.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bondy, K., Matten, D., Moon, J. (2007). Codes of conduct as a tool for sustainable governance in MNCs. In Benn, S., Dunphy, D. (Eds.), Corporate governance and sustainability: Challenges for theory and practice (pp. 165-186). London, England: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Bromley, P., Powell, W. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6, 483-530.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946-967.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18, 125-169.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cho, C. H., Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32, 639-647.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ciocirlan, C. E. (2017). Environmental workplace behaviors: Definition matters. Organization & Environment, 30, 51-70.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Coles, T., Dinan, C., Warren, N. (2016). Energy practices among small-and medium-sized tourism enterprises: A case of misdirected effort? Journal of Cleaner Production, 111, 399-408.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Corley, K. G., Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36, 12-32.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Crane, A., Palazzo, G., Spence, L. J., Matten, D. (2014). Contesting the value of “creating shared value.” California Management Review, 56, 130-153.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Crilly, D., Hansen, M., Zollo, M. (2016). The grammar of decoupling: A cognitive-linguistic perspective on firms’ sustainability claims and stakeholders’ interpretation. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 705-729.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
D’Aunno, T., Succi, M., Alexander, J. A. (2000). The role of institutional and market forces in divergent organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 679-703.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Dahlmann, F., Branicki, L., Brammer, S. (2017). “Carrots for corporate sustainability”: Impacts of incentive inclusiveness and variety on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26, 1110-1131.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Darnall, N., Henriques, I., Sadorsky, P. (2010). Adopting proactive environmental strategy: The influence of stakeholders and firm size. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 1072-1094.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Davis, M. S. (1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1, 309-344.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
De Roeck, K., Farooq, O. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and ethical leadership: Investigating their interactive effect on employees’ socially responsible behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 151, 923-939.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Delgado-Ceballos, J., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2012). The effect of internal barriers on the connection between stakeholder integration and proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 281-293.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Delmas, M. A., Etzion, D., Nairn-Birch, N. (2013). Triangulating environmental performance: What do corporate social responsibility ratings really capture? Academy of Management Perspectives, 27, 255-267.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Delmas, M. A., Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2010). Voluntary agreements to improve environmental quality: Symbolic and substantive cooperation. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 575-601.
Google Scholar | ISI
Delmas, M. A., Montes-Sancho, M. J. (2011). An institutional perspective on the diffusion of international management system standards: The case of the environmental management standard ISO 14001. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 103-132.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Delmas, M. A., Pekovic, S. (2018). Corporate sustainable innovation and employee behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 1071-1088.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Delmas, M. A., Toffel, M. W. (2004). Stakeholders and environmental management practices: An institutional framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 13, 209-222.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Derrida, J. (2008). The animal that therefore I am. New York, NY: Fordham University Press.
Google Scholar
Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23, 44-56.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
DiMaggio, P. J., Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Diouf, D., Boiral, O. (2017). The quality of sustainability reports and impression management: A stakeholder perspective. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30, 643-667.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Doda, B., Gennaioli, C., Gouldson, A., Grover, D., Sullivan, R. (2016). Are corporate carbon management practices reducing corporate carbon emissions? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23, 257-270.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Donaldson, L. (2011). Contingency theory. In Badie, B., Berg-Schlosser, D., Morlino, L. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of political science (pp. 434-436). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Dyllick, T., Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29, 156-174.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Engert, S., Rauter, R., Baumgartner, R. J. (2016). Exploring the integration of corporate sustainability into strategic management: A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2833-2850.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Entine, J. (2003). The myth of social investing: A critique of its practice and consequences for corporate social performance research. Organization & Environment, 16, 352-368.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Etzion, D., Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21, 1092-1107.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Evernden, N. (1993). The natural alien: Humankind and environment (2nd ed.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Toronto University Press.
Google Scholar
Fernández, J. L., Camacho, J. (2016). Effective elements to establish an ethical infrastructure: An exploratory study of SMEs in the Madrid region. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 113-131.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Fiss, P. C., Zajac, E. J. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 1173-1193.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Fleming, P., Jones, M. (2013). The end of corporate social responsibility. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. U., Rasche, A., Waddock, S. (2011). Accountability in a global economy: The emergence of international accountability standards. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 23-44.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G., Hamilton, A. L. (2013). Seeking qualitative rigor in inductive research: Notes on the Gioia methodology. Organizational Research Methods, 16, 15-31.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gladwin, T. N., Kennelly, J. J., Krause, T.-S. (1995). Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: Implications for management theory and research. Academy of Management Review, 20, 874-907.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Graafland, J., Smid, H. (2016). Environmental impacts of SMEs and the effects of formal management tools: Evidence from EU’s largest survey. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23, 297-307.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Graafland, J. J. (2018). Ecological impacts of the ISO14001 certification of small and medium sized enterprises in Europe and the mediating role of networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 273-282.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Graedel, T. E. (2019). Can we define planetary boundaries on the human use of materials? In Esty, D. C. (Ed.), Abstracts from a better planet: Forty big ideas for a sustainable future (pp. 258-265). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Graves, L. M., Sarkis, J. (2018). The role of employees’ leadership perceptions, values, and motivation in employees’ provenvironmental behaviors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 576-587.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gray, R., Milne, M. J. (2018). Perhaps the Dodo should have accounted for human beings? Accounts of humanity and (its) extinction. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31, 826-848.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Greening, D. W., Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 467-498.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Greenwood, R., Jennings, P. D., Hinings, B. (2015). Sustainability and organizational change. In Henderson, R., Gulati, R., Tushman, M. (Eds.), Leading sustainable change: An organizational perspective (pp. 323-355). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gresov, C., Drazin, R. (1997). Equifinality: Functional equivalence in organization design. Academy of Management Review, 22, 403-428.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hall, J. K., Bachor, V., Matos, S. (2014). The impact of stakeholder heterogeneity on risk perceptions in technological innovation. Technovation, 34, 410-419.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Halme, M., Kourula, A., Lindeman, S., Kallio, G., Lima-Toivanen, M., Korsunova, A. (2016). Sustainability innovation at the base of the pyramid through multi-sited rapid ethnography. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23, 113-128.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Halme, M., Rintamäki, J., Knudsen, J. S., Lankoski, L., Kuisma, M. (2020). When is there a sustainability case for CSR? Pathways to environmental and social performance improvements. Business & Society, 59, 1181-1227. doi:10.1177/0007650318755648
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hoejmose, S. U., Adrien-Kirby, A. J. (2012). Socially and environmentally responsible procurement: A literature review and future research agenda of a managerial issue in the 21st century. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 18, 232-242.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hoffman, A. J. (2016). Why academics are losing relevance in society—and how to stop it. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/why-academics-are-losing-relevance-in-society-and-how-to-stop-it-64579
Google Scholar
Hörisch, J., Ortas, E., Schaltegger, S., Álvarez, I. (2015). Environmental effects of sustainability management tools: An empirical analysis of large companies. Ecological Economics, 120, 241-249.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Husted, B. W. (2000). A contingency theory of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39, 24-48.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
IPIS & ULULA . (2019). Assessing the impact of due diligence programmes in eastern DRC: A baseline study. Antwerpen, Belgium: Author. Retrieved from http://ipisresearch.be/publication/assessing-impact-due-diligence-programmes-eastern-drc-baseline-study/
Google Scholar
Jennings, P. D., Zandbergen, P. A. (1995). Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institutional approach. Academy of Management Review, 20, 1015-1052.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Khanna, M., Brouhle, K. (2009). The effectiveness of voluntary environmental initiatives. In Delmas, M. A., Young, O. R. (Eds.), Governance for the environment: New perspectives (pp. 144-182). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kim, Y. H., Davis, G. F. (2016). Challenges for global supply chain sustainability: Evidence from conflict minerals reports. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1896-1916.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Labelle, R., Hafsi, T., Francoeur, C., Amar, W. B. (2018). Family firms’ corporate social performance: A calculated quest for socioemotional wealth. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 511-525.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lange, D., Washburn, N. T. (2012). Understanding attributions of corporate social irresponsibility. Academy of Management Review, 37, 300-326.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lawrence, P. R., Lorsch, J. W. (1969). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration (2nd ed.). Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
Google Scholar
Leipziger, D. (2016). The corporate responsibility code book (3rd ed.). Sheffield, England: Greenleaf.
Google Scholar
Linnenluecke, M. K., Griffiths, A. (2013). Firms and sustainability: Mapping the intellectual origins and structure of the corporate sustainability field. Global Environmental Change, 23, 382-391.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Maletič, M., Maletič, D., Gomišček, B. (2018). The role of contingency factors on the relationship between sustainability practices and organizational performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 423-433.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Margolis, J. D., Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268-305.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Matthews, L., Power, D., Touboulic, A., Marques, L. (2016). Building bridges: Toward alternative theory of sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(1), 82-94.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Milliken, F. J., Schipani, C. A., Bishara, N. D., Prado, A. M. (2015). Linking workplace practices to community engagement: The case for encouraging employee voice. Academy of Management Perspectives, 29, 405-421.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Montiel, I., Delgado-Ceballos, J. (2014). Defining and measuring corporate sustainability: Are we there yet? Organization & Environment, 27, 113-139.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Mori Junior, R., Sturman, K., Imbrogiano, J.-P. (2017). Leveraging greater impact of sustainability governance initiatives: An assessment of interoperability Brisbane, Australia: Centre for Social Responsibility in Mining, University of Queensland. Retrieved from https://www.csrm.uq.edu.au/media/docs/1520/giz-interoperability-report-july-2017-v3-17-aug-online.pdf
Google Scholar
Morioka, S. N., de Carvalho, M. M. (2016). A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for integrating sustainability performance into business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 134-146.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Nason, R. S., Bacq, S., Gras, D. (2018). A behavioral theory of social performance: Social identity and stakeholder expectations. Academy of Management Review, 43, 259-283.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Orsato, R. J. (2006). Competitive environmental strategies: When does it pay to be green? California Management Review, 48, 127-143.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Pagell, M., Shevchenko, A. (2014). Why research in sustainable supply chain management should have no future. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 44-55.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Parker, D. P., Vadheim, B. (2017). Resource cursed or policy cursed? US regulation of conflict minerals and violence in the Congo. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4, 1-49.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Patten, D. M. (2002). The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 763-773.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Paulraj, A., Chen, I. J., Blome, C. (2017). Motives and performance outcomes of sustainable supply chain management practices: A multi-theoretical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 239-258.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Phan, T. N., Baird, K., Su, S. (2018). Environmental activity management: Its use and impact on environmental performance. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 31, 651-673.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Purser, R. E., Park, C., Montuori, A. (1995). Limits to anthropocentrism: Toward an ecocentric organization paradigm? Academy of Management Review, 20, 1053-1089.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Reed, D., Utting, P., Mukherjee-Reed, A. (Eds.). (2012). Business regulation and non-state actors: Whose standards? Whose development? New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Galetti, M., Alamgir, M., Crist, E., . . .Laurance, W. F. (2017). World scientists’ warning to humanity: A second notice. BioScience, 67, 1026-1028.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rodríguez-Ariza, L., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., Martínez-Ferrero, J., García-Sánchez, I. M. (2017). The role of female directors in promoting CSR practices: An international comparison between family and non-family businesses. Business Ethics: A European Review, 26, 162-174.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Rowley, T., Berman, S. (2000). A brand new brand of corporate social performance. Business & Society, 39, 397-418.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22, 887-910.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Runhaar, H. (2016). Tools for integrating environmental objectives into policy and practice: What works where? Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 59, 1-9.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sandberg, J., Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of constructing research questions: Gap-spotting or problematization? Organization, 18, 23-44.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Schaltegger, S., Burritt, R. (2018). Business cases and corporate engagement with sustainability: Differentiating ethical motivations. Journal of Business Ethics, 147, 241-259.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Schmitz, E. A., Baum, M., Huett, P., Kabst, R. (2019). The contextual role of regulatory stakeholder pressure in proactive environmental strategies: An empirical test of competing theoretical perspectives. Organization & Environment, 32, 281-308.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Schneider, A., Meins, E. (2012). Two dimensions of corporate sustainability assessment: Towards a comprehensive framework. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21, 211-222.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Schreyögg, G. (1980). Contingency and choice in organization theory. Organization Studies, 1, 305-326.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 681-697.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sheffi, Y., Blanco, E. (2018). Balancing green: When to embrace sustainability in a business (and when not to). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Shevchenko, A., Lévesque, M., Pagell, M. (2016). Why firms delay reaching true sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 911-935.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Shrivastava, P. (1995). Ecocentric management for a risk society. Academy of Management Review, 20, 118-137.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Siebenhüner, B., Arnold, M. (2007). Organizational learning to manage sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16, 339-353.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Starik, M., Rands, G. P. (1995). Weaving an integrated web: Multilevel and multisystem perspectives of ecologically sustainable organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20, 908-935.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Stevens, J. M., Steensma, H. K., Harrison, D. A., Cochran, P. L. (2005). Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives’ decisions. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 181-195.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Stoop, N., Verpoorten, M., van der Windt, P. (2018). More legislation, more violence? The impact of Dodd-Frank in the DRC. PLoS One, 13, e0201783.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline
Swift, T. A., Humphrey, C., Gor, V. (2000). Great expectations? The dubious financial legacy of quality audits. British Journal of Management, 11, 31-45.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Testa, F., Iraldo, F., Daddi, T. (2018). The effectiveness of EMAS as a management tool: A key role for the internalization of environmental practices. Organization & Environment, 31, 48-69.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Thijssens, T., Bollen, L., Hassink, H. (2016). Managing sustainability reporting: Many ways to publish exemplary reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, 86-101.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Tosti-Kharas, J., Lamm, E., Thomas, T. E. (2017). Organization or environment? Disentangling employees’ rationales behind organizational citizenship behavior for the environment. Organization & Environment, 30, 187-210.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
van de Ven, A. H., Drazin, R. (1985). The concept of fit in contingency theory. In Cummings, L. L., Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 333-365). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Google Scholar
Villena, V. H., Gioia, D. A. (2018). On the riskiness of lower-tier suppliers: Managing sustainability in supply networks. Journal of Operations Management, 64, 65-87.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Visser, W., Matten, D., Pohl, M., Tolhurst, N. (2007). The A to Z of Corporate Social Responsibility: A complete reference guide to concepts, codes and organisations. London, England: John Wiley.
Google Scholar
Vogel, D. (2008). Private global business regulation. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 261-282.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Waddock, S. (2008). Building a new institutional infrastructure for corporate responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22, 87-108.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Walsh, J. P., Meyer, A. D., Schoonhoven, C. B. (2006). A future for organization theory: Living in and living with changing organizations. Organization Science, 17, 657-671.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wang, D. D. (2018). Unravelling the effects of the environmental technology portfolio on corporate sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25, 457-472.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., George, G. (2016). Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 534-544.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Westphal, J. D., Zajac, E. J. (1998). The symbolic management of stockholders: Corporate governance reforms and shareholder reactions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 127-153.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Whiteman, G., Walker, B., Perego, P. (2013). Planetary boundaries: Ecological foundations for corporate sustainability. Journal of Management Studies, 50, 307-336.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wood, D. J., Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229-267.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Yin, H., Schmeidler, P. J. (2009). Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Business Strategy and the Environment, 18, 469-486.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., Lai, K.-h. (2007). Green supply chain management: Pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 1041-1052.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Zilber, T. B. (2008). The work of meanings in institutional processes and thinking. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Suddaby, R., Sahlin, K. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 150-169). London, England: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Zobel, T. (2018). ISO 14001 adoption and environmental performance: The case of manufacturing in Sweden. In Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (Ed.), ISO 9001, ISO 14001, and new management standards (pp. 39-57). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Zollo, M., Cennamo, C., Neumann, K. (2013). Beyond what and why: Understanding organizational evolution towards sustainable enterprise models. Organization & Environment, 26, 241-259.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

OAE-article-ppv for GBP29.00
OAE-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP289.88
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $347.33