Abstract
This article addresses the empirical puzzle as to why some formerly deeply embedded international norms either incrementally or rapidly lose their prescriptive status and, in the extreme, can even cease to exist. Why is it that some norms are replaced while others simply disappear? The IR literature has rich explanations for norm creation, diffusion and socialization, yet there is a theoretical and empirical gap on both the dynamics and scope conditions for the degeneration of international norms. Thus, we develop hypotheses on processes and outcomes of norm disappearances that are tested with a series of qualitative studies. Norm degenerations require the presence of actors who challenge the norm and the absence of central enforcement authorities or individual states that are willing and capable of punishing norm violations. Moreover, our study shows that norms are likely to be abolished swiftly if the environment is unstable and rapidly changing and if norms are highly precise. In contrast, norms are likely to become incrementally degenerated if the environment is relatively stable and if norms are imprecise. Both processes lead to norm substitutions, provided that competing norms are present. If rival norms are absent, norms simply disappear without being replaced.
References
|
Akehurst, M (1985) Humanitarian intervention. In Bull, H (ed.) Intervention in World Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 95–118. Google Scholar | |
|
Asada, S (2006) From Mahan to Pearl Harbor: The Imperial Japanese Navy and the United States. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Avant, DD (2005) The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bellamy, A (2005) Responsibility to protect or Trojan horse? The crisis in Darfur and humanitarian intervention after Iraq. Ethics and International Affairs 19(2): 31–53. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Biddle, S (2004) Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Boutros-Ghali, B (1992) An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-keeping. New York: United Nations. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Burns, R (1971) Regulating submarine warfare, 1921–41: A case study of arms control and limited war. Military Affairs 35(2): 56–63. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Carafano, JJ (2008) Private Sector, Public Wars: Contractors in Combat — Afghanistan, Iraq, and Future Conflicts. Westport, CN: Praeger Security International. Google Scholar | |
|
Chandler, D (2002) From Kosovo to Kabul: Human Rights and International Intervention. London and Sterling, VA: Pluto Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Chesterman, D (2003) Humanitarian intervention in Afghanistan. In Welsh, J (ed.) Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 163–176. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Cohen, E, Gooch, J (2006) Military Misfortunes: The Anatomy of Failure. New York: The Free Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Commission on Wartime Contracting (2010) Are Private Contractors Performing Inherently Governmental Functions? Washington, DC. Google Scholar | |
|
Donald, D (2006) After the Bubble: British Private Security Companies after Iraq. London: RUSI. Google Scholar | |
|
Durel, Y (2000) The role of cognitive and normative frames in policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy 7(4): 495–512. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Farrell, T (2005) World culture and military power. Security Studies 14(3): 448–488. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fearon, JD (1998) Bargaining, enforcement and international cooperation. International Organization 52(2): 269–305. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Finnemore, M (2003) The Purpose of Intervention. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Foreign Affairs Committee (2002) Ninth Report of the Foreign Affairs Committee: Private Military Companies. London: The Stationery Office. Google Scholar | |
|
Geyer, M (1986) German strategy in the age of machine warfare, 1914–1945. In: Paret, P (ed.) Makers of Modern Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 527–597. Google Scholar | |
|
Goldman, EO (1994) Sunken Treaties: Naval Arms Control between the Wars. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Haas, E (1990) When Knowledge is Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Henkin, L (1968) How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Howard, ME (1979) Restraints on War: Studies in the Limitation of Armed Conflict. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
| Independent International Commission on Kosovo (2000) The Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (2001) The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre. Google Scholar | |
|
Keegan, J (1993) A History of Warfare. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; distributed by Random House. Google Scholar | |
|
Krasner, SD (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kratochwil, F, Ruggie, JG (1986) International organization: A state of the art on an art of the state. International Organization 40(4): 753–775. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Krause, K (2005) Human security: An idea whose time has come? S+F: Sicherheit und Frieden 23(1): 1–14. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Krishnan, A (2008) War as Business: Technological Change and Military Service Contracting. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Google Scholar | |
|
Leander, A (2006) Eroding State Authority? Private Military Companies and the Legitimate Use of Force. Rome: Centro Militaire di Studi Strategici. Google Scholar | |
|
Legro, J (1997) Which norms matter? Revisiting the ‘failure’ of internationalism. International Organization 51(1): 31–61. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lynch, T, Walsh, AJ (2000) The good mercenary? Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2): 133–153. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Malanczuk, P (1997) Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law. London and New York: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Markusen, A (2001) The case against privatizating national security. Paper presented at the International Political Science Association, University of Oklahoma. Google Scholar | |
|
McKeown, R (2009) Norm regress: US revisionism and the slow death of the torture norm. International Relations 23(5): 5–25. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Newman, E (2004) The ‘new wars’ debate: A historical perspective is needed. Security Dialogue 35(2): 173–189. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Olsen, JP (2001) Garbage cans, new institutionalism, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 95(1): 191–198. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Panke, D (2010) Why big states cannot do what they want: International courts and compliance. International Politics 47: 186–209. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Pattison, J (2010) Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Peach, N, Study, G (2001) Völkerrecht und Machtpolitik in den internationalen Beziehungen. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag. Google Scholar | |
|
Pease, K, Forsythe, D (1993) Human rights, humanitarian interventions, and world politics. Human Rights Quarterly 15(2): 290–314. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Pelton, RY (2007) Licensed to Kill: Hired Guns in the War on Terror. New York: Three Rivers Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Percy, S (2007a) Mercenaries: Strong norm, weak law. International Organization 61(4): 367–397. Google Scholar | |
|
Percy, SV (2007b) Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Price, R, Tannenwald, N (1996) Norms and deterrence: The nuclear and chemical weapons taboo. In: Katzenstein, P (ed.) The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University Press, 114–152. Google Scholar | |
|
Ramsbotham, O, Woodhouse, T (1996) Humanitarian Intervention in Contemporary Conflict: A Reconceptualization. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Rasor, D, Bauman, R (2007) Betraying our Troops: The Destructive Results of Privatizing War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar | |
|
Rimli, L, Schmeidel, S (2007) Private Security Companies and Local Populations. Geneva: Swiss Peace. Google Scholar | |
|
Risse, T, Cowles, MG, Caporaso, JA (eds) (2001) Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Rosert, E, Schirmbeck, S (2007) Zur Erosion internationaler Normen. Folterverbot und nukleares Tabu in der Diskussion. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 14(2): 253–288. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Schaller, C (2005) Private Sicherheitsfirmen- und Militaerfirmen in bewaffneten Konflikten. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik. Google Scholar | |
|
Shattuck, JHF (2003) Freedom on Fire: Human Rights Wars and America’s Response. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Shirer, WL (1990) The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. New York: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar | |
|
Simma, B (1999) NATO, the UN and the use of force: Legal aspects. European Journal of International Law 10: 1–22. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Singer, PW (2003) Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Thomas, W (2005) The new age of assassination. SAIS Review 25(1): 27–39. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Thomson, J (1994) Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Wendt, A (1992) Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization 88(2): 384–396. Google Scholar | |
|
Zamparelli, S (1999) Contractors on the battlefield: What have we signed up for? Air Force Journal of Logistics XXIII(3): 11–19. Google Scholar | |
|
Zarate, JC (1998) The emergence of a new dog of war: Private international security companies, international law, and new world disorder. Stanford Journal of International Law 34: 75–162. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Zentner, C (1994) Der Nürnberger Prozeß: Der Nürnberger Prozess. Stuttgart: Bilder. Google Scholar | |
|
Zürn, M, Joerges, C (eds) (2005) Law and Governance in Postnational Europe: Compliance beyond the Nation-State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref |

