This article addresses the empirical puzzle as to why some formerly deeply embedded international norms either incrementally or rapidly lose their prescriptive status and, in the extreme, can even cease to exist. Why is it that some norms are replaced while others simply disappear? The IR literature has rich explanations for norm creation, diffusion and socialization, yet there is a theoretical and empirical gap on both the dynamics and scope conditions for the degeneration of international norms. Thus, we develop hypotheses on processes and outcomes of norm disappearances that are tested with a series of qualitative studies. Norm degenerations require the presence of actors who challenge the norm and the absence of central enforcement authorities or individual states that are willing and capable of punishing norm violations. Moreover, our study shows that norms are likely to be abolished swiftly if the environment is unstable and rapidly changing and if norms are highly precise. In contrast, norms are likely to become incrementally degenerated if the environment is relatively stable and if norms are imprecise. Both processes lead to norm substitutions, provided that competing norms are present. If rival norms are absent, norms simply disappear without being replaced.

Akehurst, M (1985) Humanitarian intervention. In Bull, H (ed.) Intervention in World Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, 95118.
Google Scholar
Asada, S (2006) From Mahan to Pearl Harbor: The Imperial Japanese Navy and the United States. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.
Google Scholar
Avant, DD (2005) The Market for Force: The Consequences of Privatizing Security. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bellamy, A (2005) Responsibility to protect or Trojan horse? The crisis in Darfur and humanitarian intervention after Iraq. Ethics and International Affairs 19(2): 3153.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Biddle, S (2004) Military Power: Explaining Victory and Defeat in Modern Battle. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Boutros-Ghali, B (1992) An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-keeping. New York: United Nations.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Burns, R (1971) Regulating submarine warfare, 1921–41: A case study of arms control and limited war. Military Affairs 35(2): 5663.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Carafano, JJ (2008) Private Sector, Public Wars: Contractors in Combat — Afghanistan, Iraq, and Future Conflicts. Westport, CN: Praeger Security International.
Google Scholar
Chandler, D (2002) From Kosovo to Kabul: Human Rights and International Intervention. London and Sterling, VA: Pluto Press.
Google Scholar
Chesterman, D (2003) Humanitarian intervention in Afghanistan. In Welsh, J (ed.) Humanitarian Intervention and International Relations. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 163176.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Cohen, E, Gooch, J (2006) Military Misfortunes: The Anatomy of Failure. New York: The Free Press.
Google Scholar
Commission on Wartime Contracting (2010) Are Private Contractors Performing Inherently Governmental Functions? Washington, DC.
Google Scholar
Donald, D (2006) After the Bubble: British Private Security Companies after Iraq. London: RUSI.
Google Scholar
Durel, Y (2000) The role of cognitive and normative frames in policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy 7(4): 495512.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Farrell, T (2005) World culture and military power. Security Studies 14(3): 448488.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Fearon, JD (1998) Bargaining, enforcement and international cooperation. International Organization 52(2): 269305.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Finnemore, M (2003) The Purpose of Intervention. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Foreign Affairs Committee (2002) Ninth Report of the Foreign Affairs Committee: Private Military Companies. London: The Stationery Office.
Google Scholar
Geyer, M (1986) German strategy in the age of machine warfare, 1914–1945. In: Paret, P (ed.) Makers of Modern Strategy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 527597.
Google Scholar
Goldman, EO (1994) Sunken Treaties: Naval Arms Control between the Wars. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Google Scholar
Haas, E (1990) When Knowledge is Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Google Scholar
Henkin, L (1968) How Nations Behave: Law and Foreign Policy. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar
Howard, ME (1979) Restraints on War: Studies in the Limitation of Armed Conflict. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Independent International Commission on Kosovo (2000) The Kosovo Report: Conflict, International Response, Lessons Learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (2001) The Responsibility to Protect. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
Google Scholar
Keegan, J (1993) A History of Warfare. New York: Alfred A. Knopf; distributed by Random House.
Google Scholar
Krasner, SD (1999) Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kratochwil, F, Ruggie, JG (1986) International organization: A state of the art on an art of the state. International Organization 40(4): 753775.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Krause, K (2005) Human security: An idea whose time has come? S+F: Sicherheit und Frieden 23(1): 114.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Krishnan, A (2008) War as Business: Technological Change and Military Service Contracting. Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.
Google Scholar
Leander, A (2006) Eroding State Authority? Private Military Companies and the Legitimate Use of Force. Rome: Centro Militaire di Studi Strategici.
Google Scholar
Legro, J (1997) Which norms matter? Revisiting the ‘failure’ of internationalism. International Organization 51(1): 3161.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lynch, T, Walsh, AJ (2000) The good mercenary? Journal of Political Philosophy 8(2): 133153.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Malanczuk, P (1997) Akehurst’s Modern Introduction to International Law. London and New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Markusen, A (2001) The case against privatizating national security. Paper presented at the International Political Science Association, University of Oklahoma.
Google Scholar
McKeown, R (2009) Norm regress: US revisionism and the slow death of the torture norm. International Relations 23(5): 525.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Newman, E (2004) The ‘new wars’ debate: A historical perspective is needed. Security Dialogue 35(2): 173189.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Olsen, JP (2001) Garbage cans, new institutionalism, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 95(1): 191198.
Google Scholar | ISI
Panke, D (2010) Why big states cannot do what they want: International courts and compliance. International Politics 47: 186209.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pattison, J (2010) Humanitarian Intervention and the Responsibility to Protect: Who Should Intervene? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Peach, N, Study, G (2001) Völkerrecht und Machtpolitik in den internationalen Beziehungen. Hamburg: VSA-Verlag.
Google Scholar
Pease, K, Forsythe, D (1993) Human rights, humanitarian interventions, and world politics. Human Rights Quarterly 15(2): 290314.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pelton, RY (2007) Licensed to Kill: Hired Guns in the War on Terror. New York: Three Rivers Press.
Google Scholar
Percy, S (2007a) Mercenaries: Strong norm, weak law. International Organization 61(4): 367397.
Google Scholar
Percy, SV (2007b) Mercenaries: The History of a Norm in International Relations. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Price, R, Tannenwald, N (1996) Norms and deterrence: The nuclear and chemical weapons taboo. In: Katzenstein, P (ed.) The Culture of National Security. New York: Columbia University Press, 114152.
Google Scholar
Ramsbotham, O, Woodhouse, T (1996) Humanitarian Intervention in Contemporary Conflict: A Reconceptualization. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Rasor, D, Bauman, R (2007) Betraying our Troops: The Destructive Results of Privatizing War. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Google Scholar
Rimli, L, Schmeidel, S (2007) Private Security Companies and Local Populations. Geneva: Swiss Peace.
Google Scholar
Risse, T, Cowles, MG, Caporaso, JA (eds) (2001) Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Rosert, E, Schirmbeck, S (2007) Zur Erosion internationaler Normen. Folterverbot und nukleares Tabu in der Diskussion. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 14(2): 253288.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Schaller, C (2005) Private Sicherheitsfirmen- und Militaerfirmen in bewaffneten Konflikten. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
Google Scholar
Shattuck, JHF (2003) Freedom on Fire: Human Rights Wars and America’s Response. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Shirer, WL (1990) The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Google Scholar
Simma, B (1999) NATO, the UN and the use of force: Legal aspects. European Journal of International Law 10: 122.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Singer, PW (2003) Corporate Warriors: The Rise of the Privatized Military Industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Google Scholar
Thomas, W (2005) The new age of assassination. SAIS Review 25(1): 2739.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Thomson, J (1994) Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Wendt, A (1992) Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization 88(2): 384396.
Google Scholar
Zamparelli, S (1999) Contractors on the battlefield: What have we signed up for? Air Force Journal of Logistics XXIII(3): 1119.
Google Scholar
Zarate, JC (1998) The emergence of a new dog of war: Private international security companies, international law, and new world disorder. Stanford Journal of International Law 34: 75162.
Google Scholar | ISI
Zentner, C (1994) Der Nürnberger Prozeß: Der Nürnberger Prozess. Stuttgart: Bilder.
Google Scholar
Zürn, M, Joerges, C (eds) (2005) Law and Governance in Postnational Europe: Compliance beyond the Nation-State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here.

Your Access Options


Purchase

EJT-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $573.00

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top