![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
This article examines Universal City Studios v. Reimerdes and its appeal (Universal v. Corley), which tackle the question of whether code is speech, protected under First Amendment law. Computer code raises problems for free speech law, as code can be seen as both expression and conduct. The legal decisions in the case created an expression/function dichotomy that limited recognition of expressivity to communication among programmers through unexecuted code. This dichotomy creates a low bar for the regulation of code, including uses of code as political expression and dissent. Cultural definitions of computers and legal notions of authorship and agency rooted in old media kept the judges from considering the functional capacities of code as speech. However, legal consideration of this functional expressivity is necessary in order to recognize the actual political and cultural uses of digital media and to enable a more nuanced regulatory framework.
References
|
Baker, CE (2002) First Amendment limits on copyright. Vanderbilt Law Review 55: 891–951. Google Scholar | |
|
Bezanson, R (2009) Art and Freedom of Speech. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Boyle, J (2008) The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Braman, S (2002) Posthuman law: information policy and the machinic world. First Monday 7(12). Available at: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1011/932 Google Scholar | |
|
Burke, D (2000) Patenting speech. Texas Law Review 79(1): 99–162. Google Scholar | |
|
Coleman, G (2009) Code is speech: legal tinkering, expertise, and protest among free and open source software developers. Cultural Anthropology 24(3): 420–454. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Corley, E (1999) How you can help. 2600: Hacker Quarterly, 27 December 27 (Quoted in Fox RC (2002) Old law and new technology: the problem of computer code and the First Amendment. UCLA Law Review 49: 896). Google Scholar | |
|
Electronic Frontier Foundation (2001) Transcript of oral arguments, MPAA DVD cases archive. Available at: https://w2.eff.org/IP/Video/MPAA_DVD_cases/20010501_ny_hearing_transcript.html Google Scholar | |
|
Electronic Frontier Foundation (2010) Unintended consequences: twelve years under the DMCA. Available at: https://www.eff.org/wp/unintended-consequences-under-dmca Google Scholar | |
|
Emerson, TI (1970) The System of Freedom of Expression. New York: Random House. Google Scholar | |
|
Fox, RC (2001–2002) Old law and new technology: the problem of computer code and the First Amendment. UCLA Law Review 49: 871–916. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Gillespie, T (2007) Wired Shut. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Greenawalt, K (1992) Speech, Crime, and the Uses of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Greenman, J (2007) On communication. Michigan Law Review 106: 1338–1378. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Jackson, M (2001) Using technology to circumvent the law: the DMCA’s push to privatize copyright. Hastings Communication and Entertainment Law Journal 23: 607–646. Google Scholar | |
|
Jenkins, H (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Lessig, L (1999) Code and other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
|
McGinty, W (2008) First Amendment rights to protected expression: what are the traditional contours of copyright law? Berkeley Technology Law Journal 23(3): 1099–1140. Google Scholar | |
|
Munkittrick, D (2010) Music as speech: a First Amendment category unto itself. Federal Communications Law Journal 62(1): 665–690. Google Scholar | |
|
Ratto, M (2005) Embedded technical expression: code and the leveraging of functionality. Information Society 21: 205–213. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Schauer, F (1982) Free Speech: A Philosophical Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Stein, L (2006) Speech Rights in America: The First Amendment, Democracy, and the Media. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Streeter, T (2011) The Net Effect: Romanticism, Capitalism, and the Internet. New York: New York University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Turner, F (2006) From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Steward Brand, the Whole Earth Network and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Vaidhyanathan, S (2004) The Anarchist in the Library: How the Clash between Freedom and Control is Hacking the World and Crashing the System. New York: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Wagner, RP (1999) The medium is the mistake: the law of software for the First Amendment. Stanford Law Review 51(2): 387–408. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Winner, L (1986) Do artifacts have politics? In: Winner, L (ed.) The Whale and the Reactor: A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 19–39. Google Scholar |
