Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability

First Published December 13, 2016 Research Article

Authors

University of Southern California, USA
by this author
,
Microsoft Research New York City, USA; New York University, USA; MIT, USA
by this author
First Published Online: December 13, 2016

Models for understanding and holding systems accountable have long rested upon ideals and logics of transparency. Being able to see a system is sometimes equated with being able to know how it works and govern it—a pattern that recurs in recent work about transparency and computational systems. But can “black boxes’ ever be opened, and if so, would that ever be sufficient? In this article, we critically interrogate the ideal of transparency, trace some of its roots in scientific and sociotechnical epistemological cultures, and present 10 limitations to its application. We specifically focus on the inadequacy of transparency for understanding and governing algorithmic systems and sketch an alternative typology of algorithmic accountability grounded in constructive engagements with the limitations of transparency ideals.

Abbott, A (1988) The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Albu, OB, Flyverbom, M (2016) Organizational transparency: conceptualizations, conditions, and consequences. Business & Society. Epub ahead of print 13 July. DOI: 10.1177/0007650316659851.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Ananny, M (2016) Toward an ethics of algorithms: convening, observation, probability, and timeliness. Science, Technology & Human Values 41(1): 93117. DOI: 10.1177/0162243915606523
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Anderson, CW (2013) Towards a sociology of computational and algorithmic journalism. New Media & Society 15(7): 10051021. DOI: 10.1177/1461444812465137
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Arnoldi, J (2015) Computer algorithms, market manipulation and the institutionalization of high frequency trading. Theory, Culture & Society 33: 2952.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bacon, M (2012) Pragmatism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Google Scholar
Baecker, R (1998) Sorting out sorting: a case study of software visualization for teaching computer science. In: Stasko, J (ed.) Software Visualization Programming as a Multimedia Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 369381.
Google Scholar
Ball, C (2009) What is transparency? Public Integrity 11(4): 293308.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Barany, MJ, MacKenzie, D (2014) Chalk: materials and concepts in mathematics research. In: Coopmans, C, Vertesi, J, Lynch, M. (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 107130.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bateson, G (2000) Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Birchall, C (2011) Introduction to “secrecy and transparency”: the politics of opacity and openness. Theory, Culture & Society 28(7–8): 725.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Birchall, C (2014) Radical transparency? Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies 14(1): 7788.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bratich, J (2016) Occult(ing) transparency: an epilogue. International Journal of Communication Systems 10: 178181.
Google Scholar
Brill, J (2015) Scalable approaches to transparency and accountability in decisionmaking algorithms: remarks at the NYU conference on algorithms and accountability. Federal Trade Commission, 28 February. Available at: https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_statements/629681/150228nyualgorithms.pdf
Google Scholar
Brown, MH (1998) A taxonomy of algorithm animation displays. In: Stasko, J (ed.) Software Visualization Programming as a Multimedia Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 3542.
Google Scholar
Browne, S (2015) Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Burrell, J (2016) How the machine “thinks”: understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big Data & Society 3(1). DOI: 10.1177/2053951715622512
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Carusi, A, Hoel, AS (2014) Toward a new ontology of scientific vision. In: Coopmans, C, Vertesi, J, Lynch, M. (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 201221.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Christensen, LT, Cheney, G (2015) Peering into transparency: challenging ideals, proxies, and organizational practices. Communication Theory 25(1): 7090.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Coddington, M (2012) Defending a paradigm by patrolling a boundary: two global newspapers’ approach to WikiLeaks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 89(3): 377396.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Coleman, G (2013) Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Coopmans, C, Vertesi, J, Lynch, M. (2014) Introduction. In: Coopmans, C, Vertesi, J, Lynch, M. (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 112.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Crain, M (2018) The limits of transparency: data brokers and commodification. New Media & Society 20(1): 88104.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Crain, W (2000) Theories and Development: Concepts and Applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Crary, J (1990) Techniques of the Observer. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Crawford, K (2016) Can an algorithm be agonistic? Ten scenes from life in calculated publics. Science, Technology & Human Values 41(1): 7792.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
da Vinci, L (2015) Notebooks of Leonardo Da Vinci (trans. Richter, JP ). Istanbul: eKitap Projesi.
Google Scholar
Daston, L (1992) Objectivity and the escape from perspective. Social Studies of Science 22(4): 597618.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Daston, L, Galison, P (2007) Objectivity. Brooklyn, NY: Zone Books.
Google Scholar
Datta, A, Tschantz, MC, Datta, A (2015) Automated experiments on ad privacy settings. Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies 1: 92112.
Google Scholar | Crossref
David, M (2015) The correspondence theory of truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 28 May Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-correspondence/
Google Scholar
De Rijcke, S, Beaulieu, A (2014) Networked neuroscience: brain scans and visual knowing at the intersection of atlases and databases. In: Coopmans, C, Vertesi, J, Lynch, M. (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 131152.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Dewey, J (1997) Experience and Education. New York: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Diakopoulos, N (2016) Accountability in algorithmic decision making. Communications of the ACM 59(2): 5662.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
DiSalvo, C (2012) Adversarial Design. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Dougherty, C (2015) Google photos mistakenly labels black people “gorillas.” The New York Times, 1 July. Available at: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/07/01/google-photos-mistakenly-labels-black-people-gorillas/
Google Scholar
Driscoll, K, Walker, S (2014) Working within a black box: transparency in the collection and production of big Twitter data. International Journal of Communication Systems 8: 17451764.
Google Scholar
Eslami, M, Rickman, A, Vaccaro, K. (2015) “I always assumed that I wasn’t really that close to [her]”: reasoning about invisible algorithms in the news feed. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 18–23 April.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Flyverbom, M (2016) Transparency: mediation and the management of visibilities. International Journal of Communication Systems 10: 110122.
Google Scholar
Fox, J (2007) The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice 17(4–5): 663671.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Fung, A, Graham, M, Weil, D (2008) Full Disclosure: The Perils and Promise of Transparency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Gillespie, T (2014) The relevance of algorithms. In: Gillespie, T, Boczkowski, P, Foot, KA (eds) Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 167194.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Glasser, TL (1989) Three views on accountability. In: Dennis, EE, Gillmor, DM, Glasser, TL (eds) Media Freedom and Accountability. New York: Praeger.
Google Scholar
Goodwin, C (1994) Professional vision. American Anthropologist 96(3): 606633.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Greenwald, G (2014) No Place to Hide. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Google Scholar
Hallinan, B, Striphas, T (2014) Recommended for you: the Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society 18: 117137.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hansen, HK, Flyverbom, M (2015) The politics of transparency and the calibration of knowledge in the digital age. Organization 22(6): 872889.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Heald, D (2006) Varieties of transparency. Proceedings of the British Academy 135: 2543.
Google Scholar
Heemsbergen, L (2016) From radical transparency to radical disclosure: reconfiguring (in)voluntary transparency through the management of visibilities. International Journal of Communication Systems 10: 138151.
Google Scholar
Hilgartner, S (2000) Science on Stage: Expert Advice as Public Drama. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Hood, C (2006) Transparency in historical perspective. In: Hood, C, Heald, D (eds) Transparency: The Key to Better Governance? Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 123.
Google Scholar | Crossref
James, W (1997) What pragmatism means. In: Menand, L (ed.) Pragmatism: A Reader. New York: Random House, pp. 93111.
Google Scholar
Kelty, C (2008) Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kushner, S (2013) The freelance translation machine: algorithmic culture and the invisible industry. New Media & Society 15: 12411258.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Leigh, D, Harding, L (2011) WikiLeaks: Inside Julian Assange’s War on Secrecy. New York: Public Affairs.
Google Scholar
Levy, KEC (2015) The contexts of control: information, power, and truck-driving work. Information Society 31(2): 160174.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Levy, KEC, Johns, DM (2016) When open data is a Trojan Horse: the weaponization of transparency in science and governance. Big Data & Society 3(1). http://bds.sagepub.com/content/3/1/2053951715621568
Google Scholar
Lynch, M, Woolgar, S (1988) Introduction: sociological orientations to representational practice in science. Human Studies 11(2): 99116.
Google Scholar | ISI
Mackenzie, A (2015) The production of prediction: what does machine learning want? European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(4–5): 429445.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Mackenzie, D (2008) An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Michaels, D (2008) Doubt Is Their Product: How Industry’s Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Minsky, M (2007) The Emotion Machine: Commonsense Thinking, Artificial Intelligence, and the Future of the Human Mind. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Google Scholar
Misak, C (ed.) (2007) New Pragmatists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Napoli, PM (2014) Automated media: an institutional theory perspective on algorithmic media production and consumption. Communication Theory 24(3): 340360.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Neyland, D, Möllers, N (2016) Algorithmic IF … THEN rules and the conditions and consequences of power. Information, Communication & Society, 20 (1): 4562.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Papert, S (1980) Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Pasquale, F (2015) The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Phillips, JWP (2011) Secrecy and transparency: an interview with Samuel Weber. Theory, Culture & Society 28(7–8): 158172.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Resnick, M, Berg, R, Eisenberg, M (2000) Beyond black boxes: bringing transparency and aesthetics back to scientific investigation. Journal of the Learning Sciences 9(1): 730.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Schnackenberg, AK, Tomlinson, EC (2014) Organizational transparency: a new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Management 42: 17841810.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Schrock, AR (2016) Civic hacking as data activism and advocacy: a history from publicity to open government data. New Media & Society 18: 581599.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Schudson, M (2015) The Rise of the Right to Know. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Publishing.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Squires, CR (2002) Rethinking the black public sphere: an alternative vocabulary for multiple public spheres. Communication Theory 12(4): 446468.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Stiny, G (1980) Kindergarten grammars: designing with Froebel’s building gifts. Environment and Planning B 7(4): 409462.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Stohl, C, Stohl, M, Leonardi, PM (2016) Managing opacity: information visibility and the paradox of transparency in the digital age. International Journal of Communication Systems 10: 123137.
Google Scholar
Striphas, T (2015) Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies 18(4–5): 395412.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Tkacz, N (2015) Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Turner, F (2006) From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Turner, F (2013) The Democratic Surround. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Vertesi, J (2014) Drawing as: distinctions and disambiguation in digital images of Mars. In: Coopmans, C, Vertesi, J, Lynch, M. (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice Revisited. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, pp. 1536.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wade, L (2010) HP software doesn’t see black people. Sociological Images, 5 January. Available at: https://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/01/05/hp-software-doesnt-see-black-people/
Google Scholar
Ward, SC (1996) Reconfiguring Truth. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Zara, C (2015) FTC chief technologist Ashkan Soltani on algorithmic transparency and the fight against biased bots. International Business Times, 9 April. Available at: http://www.ibtimes.com/ftc-chief-technologist-ashkan-soltani-algorithmic-transparency-fight-against-biased-1876177
Google Scholar

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

NMS-article-ppv for GBP29.00
NMS-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP408.40
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $489.33