![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
The philosophical tradition of liberal political thought has come to see tolerance as a crucial element of a liberal political order. However, while much has been made of the value of toleration, little work has been done on individual-level motivations for tolerant behavior. In this article, we seek to develop an account of the rational motivations for toleration and of where the limits of toleration lie. We first present a very simple model of rational motivations for toleration. Key to this model is an application of David Ricardo’s model of trade to thinking about toleration. This model supports the claim that we always have reasons to be as tolerant as possible. We then explore why we do not always see tolerant attitudes in the actual world, and point to some potential preconditions for toleration that the initial model does not capture. Subsequently, we examine a more detailed model that allows us to investigate more carefully the conditions under which tolerant behavior can be rewarded. We conclude by arguing that a consideration of self-interested motivations for toleration is essential to the success of a robust theory of toleration for a diverse society, but that even this approach has its limitations.
References
|
Al, Jazeera English (2010) French cabinet approves veil ban. 19 May. Available at: http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2010/05/201051911313208338.html. Google Scholar | |
|
Cohen, AJ (2004) What toleration is. Ethics 115: 68–95. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dees, R (1999) Establishing toleration. Political Theory 27(5): 667–93. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Friedman, M (1965) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Fuller, LL (1969) The Morality of Law, 2nd edn. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Galeotti, AE (2003) Is toleration a moral virtue? In: Castiglione, D, McKinnon, C (eds) Toleration, Neutrality and Democracy. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Heyd, D (1996) Introduction. In: Heyd, D (ed.) Toleration: An Elusive Virtue. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Hirschman, AO (1977) The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before its Triumph. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Horton, J (1996) Toleration as a virtue. In: Heyd, D (ed.) Toleration: An Elusive Virtue. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 28–43. Google Scholar | |
|
Jha, S (2007) Maintaining peace across ethnic lines: New lessons from the past. Economics of Peace and Security Journal 2(2): 81–93. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Locke, J (1983) A Letter Concerning Toleration. Tully, JH (ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett. Google Scholar | |
|
Mill, JS (1991) On Liberty. Gray, J (ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Page, S (2007) The Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Ricardo, D (2010) On The Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. Saffra, P, Dobb, MH (eds). New York: Liberty Fund. Google Scholar | |
|
Watts, DJ, Strogatz, SH (1998) Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684): 409–10. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Williams, B (1996) Toleration: An impossible virtue. In: Heyd, D (ed.) Toleration: An Elusive Virtue. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 18–27. Google Scholar | |
|
World Bulletin (2009) Swiss politician apologises over cemetery ban call. 4 December. Available at: http://www.worldbulletin.net/news_detail.php?id=50815. Google Scholar |
