Abstract
Some ideologically extreme candidates appear to generate enthusiastic support from individual donors, but previous systematic analysis has found no overall fundraising benefits accruing to extremism. I propose that the similar amount of funds raised by extreme and moderate candidates masks different fundraising coalitions. Just as senior members of Congress may have a comparative advantage in raising money from access-oriented contributors, ideologically extreme members of Congress may have a comparative advantage in raising money from ideologically motivated individual contributors. I test for this possibility by using a multilevel model to predict the proportion of funds candidates raise from individual contributions and confirm that, holding total fundraising amounts constant, extreme candidates are more likely to rely on individual contributors than are moderate candidates.
|
Clawson, D. , Neustadtl, A. , & Weller, M. ( 1998). Dollars and votes: How business campaign contributions subvert democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Fiorina, M.P. ( 2002). Parties, participation, and representation in America: Old theories face new realities. In I. Katznelson & H. V. Milner (Eds.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 511-541). New York: W. W. Norton. Google Scholar | |
|
Fiorina, M.P. , Abrams, S.J. , & Pope, J.C. ( 2006). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman. Google Scholar | |
|
Francia, P.L. , Green, J.C. , Herrnson, P.S. , Powell, L.W. , & Wilcox, C. ( 2003). The financiers of Congressional elections: Investors, ideologues, and intimates. New York: Columbia University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Franz, M.M. ( 2008). Choices and changes: Interest groups in the electoral process. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Gelman, A. , & Hill, J. ( 2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/ hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Grier, K.B. , & Munger, M.C. ( 1993). Comparing interest group PAC contributions to house and senate incumbents, 1980-1986. Journal of Politics, 55, 615-643. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Institute for Politics Democracy & the Internet. ( 2006). Small donors and online giving: A study of donors to the 2004 presidential campaigns. Retrieved November 10, 2009 , from http://www.ipdi.org/UploadedFiles/Small%20Donors%20Report.pdf. Google Scholar | |
|
Jacobson, G.C. ( 2007). A divider, not a uniter: George W. Bush and the American people. New York: Pearson Longman . Google Scholar | |
|
Joe, W.Y. , Malbin, M.J. Wilcox, C. , Brusoe, P.W. , & Pimlott, J. ( 2008, April). Who are the individual donors to gubernatorial and state legislative elections? Paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. Google Scholar | |
|
Mayhew, D.R. ( 1986). Placing parties in American politics: Organization, electoral settings, and government activity in the twentieth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
McCarty, N. , Poole, K.T. , & Rosenthal, H. ( 2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Olson, M. ( 1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Poole, K.T. , & Rosenthal, H. ( 1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting . New York: Oxford University Press . Google Scholar | |
|
Schier, S.E. ( 2000). By invitation only: The rise of exclusive politics in the United States. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Smith, B.A. ( 2001). Unfree speech: The folly of campaign finance reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Verba, S. , Schlozman, K.L. , & Brady, H.E. ( 1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Wilson, J.Q. ( 1973). Political organizations. New York : Basic Books. Google Scholar |
