Individual Contributions: A Fundraising Advantage for the Ideologically Extreme?

First Published June 30, 2010 Research Article

Authors

Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT, USA, [email protected]
by this author
First Published Online: June 30, 2010

Some ideologically extreme candidates appear to generate enthusiastic support from individual donors, but previous systematic analysis has found no overall fundraising benefits accruing to extremism. I propose that the similar amount of funds raised by extreme and moderate candidates masks different fundraising coalitions. Just as senior members of Congress may have a comparative advantage in raising money from access-oriented contributors, ideologically extreme members of Congress may have a comparative advantage in raising money from ideologically motivated individual contributors. I test for this possibility by using a multilevel model to predict the proportion of funds candidates raise from individual contributions and confirm that, holding total fundraising amounts constant, extreme candidates are more likely to rely on individual contributors than are moderate candidates.

Clawson, D. , Neustadtl, A. , & Weller, M. ( 1998). Dollars and votes: How business campaign contributions subvert democracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar
Fiorina, M.P. ( 2002). Parties, participation, and representation in America: Old theories face new realities. In I. Katznelson & H. V. Milner (Eds.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 511-541). New York: W. W. Norton.
Google Scholar
Fiorina, M.P. , Abrams, S.J. , & Pope, J.C. ( 2006). Culture war? The myth of a polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.
Google Scholar
Francia, P.L. , Green, J.C. , Herrnson, P.S. , Powell, L.W. , & Wilcox, C. ( 2003). The financiers of Congressional elections: Investors, ideologues, and intimates. New York: Columbia University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Franz, M.M. ( 2008). Choices and changes: Interest groups in the electoral process. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Google Scholar
Gelman, A. , & Hill, J. ( 2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/ hierarchical models. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Grier, K.B. , & Munger, M.C. ( 1993). Comparing interest group PAC contributions to house and senate incumbents, 1980-1986. Journal of Politics, 55, 615-643.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Institute for Politics Democracy & the Internet. ( 2006). Small donors and online giving: A study of donors to the 2004 presidential campaigns. Retrieved November 10, 2009 , from http://www.ipdi.org/UploadedFiles/Small%20Donors%20Report.pdf.
Google Scholar
Jacobson, G.C. ( 2007). A divider, not a uniter: George W. Bush and the American people. New York: Pearson Longman .
Google Scholar
Joe, W.Y. , Malbin, M.J. Wilcox, C. , Brusoe, P.W. , & Pimlott, J. ( 2008, April). Who are the individual donors to gubernatorial and state legislative elections? Paper presented at the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Google Scholar
Mayhew, D.R. ( 1986). Placing parties in American politics: Organization, electoral settings, and government activity in the twentieth century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
McCarty, N. , Poole, K.T. , & Rosenthal, H. ( 2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
Olson, M. ( 1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Poole, K.T. , & Rosenthal, H. ( 1997). Congress: A political-economic history of roll call voting . New York: Oxford University Press .
Google Scholar
Schier, S.E. ( 2000). By invitation only: The rise of exclusive politics in the United States. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Google Scholar
Smith, B.A. ( 2001). Unfree speech: The folly of campaign finance reform. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Verba, S. , Schlozman, K.L. , & Brady, H.E. ( 1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Wilson, J.Q. ( 1973). Political organizations. New York : Basic Books.
Google Scholar

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

APR-article-ppv for GBP29.00
APR-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for GBP285.99
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $342.66