Since the 1970s, American politics has taken an impressive turn away from political dealignment and moved toward a more responsible party system. As a result, elections have become more nationalized, a process by which presidential and national politics exert greater influence over down-ballot contests. We evaluate nationalization in electoral contests for two high-profile offices—U.S. Senate and governor—that encompass the same constituencies but constitute markedly different job descriptions and mandated responsibilities. Our analysis utilizes both macro- and micro-level data (election returns and surveys, respectively) to assess patterns of nationalization in these elections. Although it is perhaps not surprising that the linkage between presidential and senatorial contests has tightened, it appears national political forces now also exert greater influence over gubernatorial contests. Nonetheless, we do find regional variation in the nationalization of senatorial and gubernatorial politics, which is more evident in the latter office.

Abramowitz, A. I. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Abramowitz, A. I., Saunders, K. L. (1998). Ideological realignment in the U.S. electorate. Journal of Politics, 60, 634-652.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Abramowitz, A. I., Webster, S. (2016). The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century. Electoral Studies, 41, 12-22.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Aistrup, J. A. (1996). The southern strategy revisited: Republican top-down advancement in the south. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, S., Snyder, J. M. (2002). The incumbency advantage in U.S. elections: An analysis of state and federal offices, 1942-2000. Election Law Journal, 1, 315-338.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Atkeson, L. R., Partin, R. W. (1995). Economic and referendum voting: A comparison of gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Political Science Review, 89, 99-107.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bartels, L. M. (1998). Electoral continuity and change, 1868-1996. Electoral Studies, 17, 301-326.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bartels, L. M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-1996. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 35-50.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bass, J., DeVries, W. (1976). The transformation of southern politics: Social change and political consequence since 1945. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Bishop, B., Cushing, R. G. (2008). The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
Google Scholar
Black, E., Black, M. (1987). Politics and society in the south. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Black, E., Black, M. (2002). The rise of southern republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
Black, E., Black, M. (2007). Divided America: The ferocious power struggle in American politics. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
Google Scholar
Brown, A. R., Jacobson, G. C. (2008). Party, performance, and strategic politicians: The dynamics of elections for senator and governor in 2006. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 8, 384-409.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Bullock, C. S., Hoffman, D. R., Gaddie, R. K. (2005). The consolidation of the white southern congressional vote. Political Research Quarterly, 58, 231-243.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Cain, B., Ferejohn, J., Fiorina, M. (1987). The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Carmines, E. G., Stimson, J. A. (1989). Issue evolution: Race and the transformation of American politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Carsey, T. M., Layman, G. C. (2004). Policy balancing and preferences for party control of government. Political Research Quarterly, 57, 541-550.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Carsey, T. M., Wright, G. C. (1998a). State and national factors in gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 994-1002.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Carsey, T. M., Wright, G. C. (1998b). State and national factors in gubernatorial and senatorial elections: A rejoinder. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1008-1011.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Carson, J. L., Sievert, J. (2017). Congressional candidates in the era of party ballots. Journal of Politics, 79, 534-545.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Claggett, W., Flanigan, W., Zingale, N. (1984). Nationalization of the American electorate. American Political Science Review, 78, 77-91.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cox, G. W., Katz, J. N. (1996). Why did the incumbency advantage in U.S. house elections grow? American Journal of Political Science, 40, 478-497.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Davis, N. T., Mason, L. (2016). Sorting and the split-ticket: Evidence from presidential and subpresidential elections. Political Behavior, 38, 337-354.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Engstrom, E. J., Kernell, S. (2014). Party ballots, reform, and the transformation of America’s electoral system. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Fenno, R. F. (1978). Home style: House member in their districts. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. P. (1977). Congress: Keystone of the Washington establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Flanigan, W. H., Zingale, N. H., Theiss-Morse, E. A., Wagner, M. W. (2015). Political behavior of the American electorate. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Google Scholar
Fleisher, R., Bond, J. R. (2004). The shrinking middle in the US congress. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 429-451.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gasper, J. T., Reeves, A. (2011). Make it rain? Retrospection and the attentive electorate in the context of natural disasters. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 340-355.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gimpel, J. G., Schuknecht, J. E. (2004). Patchwork nation: Sectionalism and political change in American politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Google Scholar
Hetherington, M. J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. American Political Science Review, 95, 619-631.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Highton, B. (2000). Senate elections in the United States, 1920–94. British Journal of Political Science, 30, 483-506.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Holbrook, T. M. (2016). Altered states: Changing populations, changing parties, and the transformation of the American political landscape. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Iyengar, S., Westwood, S. J. (2014). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59, 690-707.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jacobson, G. C. (1993). Getting the details right: A comment on “changing meanings of electoral marginality in US house elections, 1824-1978.” Political Research Quarterly, 46, 49-54.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Jacobson, G. C. (2007). A divider, not a uniter: George W. Bush and the American people. New York, NY: Pearson Longman.
Google Scholar
Jacobson, G. C. (2009). The 2008 presidential and congressional elections: Anti-bush referendum and prospects for the democratic majority. Political Science Quarterly, 124, 1-30.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jacobson, G. C. (2011). The republican resurgence in 2010. Political Science Quarterly, 126, 27-52.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jacobson, G. C. (2012). The president’s effect on partisan attitudes. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 42, 683-718.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Jacobson, G. C. (2013). How the economy and partisanship shaped the 2012 presidential and congressional elections. Political Science Quarterly, 128, 1-38.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Jacobson, G. C. (2014). Congress: Partisanship and polarization. In Nelson, M. (Ed.), The elections of 2012 (pp. 145-171). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Jacobson, G. C. (2015a). It’s nothing personal: The decline of the incumbency advantage in U.S. house elections. Journal of Politics, 77, 861-873.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jacobson, G. C. (2015b). Obama and nationalized electoral politics in the 2014 midterm. Political Science Quarterly, 130, 1-26.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jacobson, G. C., Carson, J. L. (2016). The politics of congressional elections. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Google Scholar
Kawato, S. (1987). Nationalization and partisan realignment in congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 81, 1235-1250.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kogan, V., Lavertu, S., Peskowitz, Z. (2018). Election timing, electorate composition, and policy outcomes: Evidence from school districts. American Journal of Political Science, 62, 637-651.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lang, C., Pearson-Merkowitz, S. (2015). Partisan sorting in the United States, 1972-2012: New evidence from a dynamic analysis. Political Geography, 48, 119-129.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Levendusky, M. (2009). The partisan sort: How liberals became democrats and conservatives became republicans. Chicago, IL: The University Chicago Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mayhew, D. R. (1974). Congress: The electoral connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Mayhew, D. R. (2002). Electoral realignments: A critique of an American genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
McKee, S. C. (2008). Rural voters and the polarization of American presidential elections. PS: Political Science & Politics, 41, 101-108.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McKee, S. C. (2012). The past, present, and future of southern politics. Southern Cultures, 18, 95-117.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McKee, S. C., Teigen, J. M. (2009). Probing the reds and blues: Sectionalism and voter location in the 2000 and 2004 U.S. presidential elections. Political Geography, 28, 484-495.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
McKee, S. C., Yoshinaka, A. (2015). Late to the parade: Party switchers in contemporary US southern legislatures. Party Politics, 21, 957-969.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Morrill, R. L., Webster, G. R. (2015). Spatial and political realignment of the U.S. electorate, 1988-2012. Political Geography, 48, 93-107.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Myers, A. (2013). Secular geographical polarization in the American south: The case of Texas, 1996-2010. Electoral Studies, 32, 38-62.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Nicholson, S. P. (2005). Voting the agenda: Candidates, elections, and ballot propositions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Rusk, J. G. (1970). The effect of the Australian ballot reform on split ticket voting: 1876-1908. American Political Science Review, 64, 1220-1238.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Shafer, B. E. (2016). The American political pattern: Stability and change, 1932-2016. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Google Scholar
Simon, D. M. (1989). Presidents, governors, and electoral accountability. Journal of Politics, 51, 286-304.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Smith, D. A., Tolbert, C. J. (2010). Direct democracy, public opinion, and candidate choice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 85-108.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Squire, P., Fastnow, C. (1994). Comparing gubernatorial and senate elections. Political Research Quarterly, 47, 705-720.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Stokes, D. (1967). Parties and the nationalization of electoral forces. In Chambers, W. N., Burnham, W. D. (Eds.), The American party systems (pp. 182-202). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Wattenberg, M. P. (1998). The decline of American political parties, 1952-1996. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar
West, D. M. (2013). Air wars: Television advertising and social media in election campaigns 1952-2012. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Google Scholar
Wright, G. C. (1989). Level-of-analysis effects on explanations of voting: The case of the 1982 US senate elections. British Journal of Political Science, 19, 381-398.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

APR-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $342.66

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top