This study investigates the effects of social network disagreement on candidate preferences. Although much research has explored the effects of disagreement on political tolerance and disengagement, less work has examined the relation between disagreement and political reasoning. We predicted that because disagreement reveals conflicting points of view and motivates people to consider these views, it should promote more effortful reasoning—and thus increased reliance on policy preferences and decreased reliance on party identification when choosing between candidates. Using panel data from the 2008 and 2012 U.S. Presidential elections, we find that respondents in high-disagreement networks tend to shift their candidate preferences to align with their policy preferences regardless of their party identification. In low-disagreement networks, respondents tended to follow party over policy. In sum, the determinants of candidate preferences differ depending on individuals’ social networks. In some cases, disagreement may promote more normatively desirable political decision-making.

Abramowitz, A. I. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Albertson, B., Gadarian, S. K. (2015). Anxious politics: Democratic citizenship in a threatening world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351-368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: Wiley.
Google Scholar
Chen, P. G., Appleby, J., Borgida, E., Callaghan, T. H., Ekstrom, P. D., Farhart, C. E., Williams, A. L. (2014). The Minnesota Multi-Investigator 2012 Presidential Election Panel Study. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14, 78-104. doi:10.1111/asap.12041
Google Scholar | Crossref
DeBell, M., Krosnick, J. A., Lupia, A. (2010). Methodology report and user’s guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.
Google Scholar
Erisen, E., Erisen, C. (2012). The effect of social networks on the quality of political thinking. Political Psychology, 33, 839-865. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00906.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Eveland, W. P., Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205-224. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ewers, J. (2008, October 23). Barack Obama and John McCain on abortion and gay marriage. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/news/campaign-2008/articles/2008/10/23/barack-obama-and-john-mccain-on-abortion-and-gay-marriage
Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Google Scholar
Goren, P. (1997). Political expertise and issue voting in presidential elections. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 387-412. doi:10.1177/106591299705000207
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Green, M. C., Visser, P. S., Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with accountability cross-pressures: Low-effort evasive tactics and high-effort quests for complex compromises. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1380-1391. doi:10.1177/0146167200263006
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Harris, M., Zhao, X. (2007). A zero-inflated ordered probit model, with an application to modelling tobacco consumption. Journal of Econometrics, 14, 1073-1099. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.01.002
Google Scholar | Crossref
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hillygus, D. S., Shields, T. G. (2008). The persuadable voter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Huckfeldt, R., Lake, R. L. D. (2000). A report on the social network battery in the 1998 American National Election Study pilot study (ANES Pilot Study Report no. nes010110). Retrieved from https://www.electionstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/nes010110.pdf
Google Scholar
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M. (2008). Moths, flames, and political engagement: Managing disagreement within communication networks. The Journal of Politics, 70, 83-96. doi:10.1017/S0022381607080073
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25, 65-95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Huckfeldt, R., Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kahn, K. F., Kenney, P. J. (1997). A model of candidate evaluations in senate elections: The impact of campaign intensity. The Journal of Politics, 59, 1173-1205. doi:10.2307/2998597
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A. E., McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 120-134. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lavine, H. G., Johnston, C. D., Steenbergen, M. R. (2012). The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
McClurg, S. D. (2006). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 737-754.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mutz, D. C. (2002a). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96, 111-126. doi:10.1017/S0003055402004264
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mutz, D. C. (2002b). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838-855. doi:10.2307/3088437
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 422-442. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh069
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Parsons, B. M. (2010). Social networks and the affective impact of political disagreement. Political Behavior, 32, 181-204. doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9100-6
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Saad, L. (2008). Economy reigns supreme for voters. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/111586/economy-reigns-supreme-voters.aspx
Google Scholar
Saad, L. (2012). Economy is dominant issue for Americans as election nears. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/158267/economy-dominant-issue-americans-election-nears.aspx
Google Scholar
Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21, 315-338. doi:10.1080/10584600490481389
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sinclair, B. (2012). The social citizen: Peer networks and political behavior. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sniderman, P. M., Stiglitz, E. H. (2012). The reputational premium: A theory of party identification and policy reasoning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537. doi:10.1037/h0037039
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Visser, P. S., Mirabile, R. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 779-795. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.779
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here.

Your Access Options


Purchase

APR-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $342.66

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top