Abstract
This study investigates the effects of social network disagreement on candidate preferences. Although much research has explored the effects of disagreement on political tolerance and disengagement, less work has examined the relation between disagreement and political reasoning. We predicted that because disagreement reveals conflicting points of view and motivates people to consider these views, it should promote more effortful reasoning—and thus increased reliance on policy preferences and decreased reliance on party identification when choosing between candidates. Using panel data from the 2008 and 2012 U.S. Presidential elections, we find that respondents in high-disagreement networks tend to shift their candidate preferences to align with their policy preferences regardless of their party identification. In low-disagreement networks, respondents tended to follow party over policy. In sum, the determinants of candidate preferences differ depending on individuals’ social networks. In some cases, disagreement may promote more normatively desirable political decision-making.
References
|
Abramowitz, A. I. (2010). The disappearing center: Engaged citizens, polarization, and American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Albertson, B., Gadarian, S. K. (2015). Anxious politics: Democratic citizenship in a threatening world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351-368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. New York, NY: Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Chen, P. G., Appleby, J., Borgida, E., Callaghan, T. H., Ekstrom, P. D., Farhart, C. E., Williams, A. L. (2014). The Minnesota Multi-Investigator 2012 Presidential Election Panel Study. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14, 78-104. doi:10.1111/asap.12041 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
DeBell, M., Krosnick, J. A., Lupia, A. (2010). Methodology report and user’s guide for the 2008–2009 ANES Panel Study. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. Google Scholar | |
|
Eagly, A. H., Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers. Google Scholar | |
|
Erisen, E., Erisen, C. (2012). The effect of social networks on the quality of political thinking. Political Psychology, 33, 839-865. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00906.x Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Eveland, W. P., Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and “heterogeneity” of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59, 205-224. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.x Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Ewers, J. (2008, October 23). Barack Obama and John McCain on abortion and gay marriage. U.S. News & World Report. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/news/campaign-2008/articles/2008/10/23/barack-obama-and-john-mccain-on-abortion-and-gay-marriage Google Scholar | |
|
Festinger, L. (1962). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Goren, P. (1997). Political expertise and issue voting in presidential elections. Political Research Quarterly, 50, 387-412. doi:10.1177/106591299705000207 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Green, M. C., Visser, P. S., Tetlock, P. E. (2000). Coping with accountability cross-pressures: Low-effort evasive tactics and high-effort quests for complex compromises. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1380-1391. doi:10.1177/0146167200263006 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Harris, M., Zhao, X. (2007). A zero-inflated ordered probit model, with an application to modelling tobacco consumption. Journal of Econometrics, 14, 1073-1099. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.01.002 Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: John Wiley. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hillygus, D. S., Shields, T. G. (2008). The persuadable voter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Huckfeldt, R., Johnson, P. E., Sprague, J. (2004). Political disagreement: The survival of diverse opinions within communication networks. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Huckfeldt, R., Lake, R. L. D. (2000). A report on the social network battery in the 1998 American National Election Study pilot study (ANES Pilot Study Report no. nes010110). Retrieved from https://www.electionstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/nes010110.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M. (2008). Moths, flames, and political engagement: Managing disagreement within communication networks. The Journal of Politics, 70, 83-96. doi:10.1017/S0022381607080073 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Huckfeldt, R., Mendez, J. M., Osborn, T. (2004). Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogeneous networks. Political Psychology, 25, 65-95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00357.x Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Huckfeldt, R., Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kahn, K. F., Kenney, P. J. (1997). A model of candidate evaluations in senate elections: The impact of campaign intensity. The Journal of Politics, 59, 1173-1205. doi:10.2307/2998597 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A. E., McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 120-134. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.x Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lavine, H. G., Johnston, C. D., Steenbergen, M. R. (2012). The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Marcus, G. E., Neuman, W. R., MacKuen, M. (2000). Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
McClurg, S. D. (2006). The electoral relevance of political talk: Examining disagreement and expertise effects in social networks on political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 50, 737-754. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mutz, D. C. (2002a). Cross-cutting social networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96, 111-126. doi:10.1017/S0003055402004264 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mutz, D. C. (2002b). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46, 838-855. doi:10.2307/3088437 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17, 422-442. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edh069 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Parsons, B. M. (2010). Social networks and the affective impact of political disagreement. Political Behavior, 32, 181-204. doi:10.1007/s11109-009-9100-6 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Saad, L. (2008). Economy reigns supreme for voters. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/111586/economy-reigns-supreme-voters.aspx Google Scholar | |
|
Saad, L. (2012). Economy is dominant issue for Americans as election nears. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/158267/economy-dominant-issue-americans-election-nears.aspx Google Scholar | |
|
Scheufele, D. A., Nisbet, M. C., Brossard, D., Nisbet, E. C. (2004). Social structure and citizenship: Examining the impacts of social setting, network heterogeneity, and informational variables on political participation. Political Communication, 21, 315-338. doi:10.1080/10584600490481389 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sinclair, B. (2012). The social citizen: Peer networks and political behavior. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Sniderman, P. M., Stiglitz, E. H. (2012). The reputational premium: A theory of party identification and policy reasoning. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537. doi:10.1037/h0037039 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Stroud, N. J. (2011). Niche news: The politics of news choice. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Visser, P. S., Mirabile, R. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 779-795. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.779 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |


