Can those in charge of redistricting foster electoral competitiveness by targeting some congressional incumbents while protecting others from potent competition? We provide an answer by presenting the dynamic redistricting thesis, which holds that the type of redistricting plan and the time passed since its enactment affect the emergence of high-quality congressional candidates. We demonstrate that the effect of redistricting on competition depends on whether incumbents belong to the party that controlled the redistricting process. We show that partisan plans have predictable systematic effects, with incumbents in the minority more likely to face strong opponents. Moreover, the effect of redistricting on competition is highest at the beginning of the 10-year redistricting cycle and diminishes in a nonlinear fashion over the course of the cycle. The implications of our theory and findings for democracy are apparent: Institutions are an important determinant of the variation of electoral competition across time and space.

Abramowitz, A.I. ( 1983). Partisan redistricting and the 1982 congressional elections . Journal of Politics, 45, 767-770.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Abramowitz, A.I. , Alexander, B. , & Gunning, M. ( 2006a). Don’t blame redistricting for uncompetitive elections . PS: Political Science & Politics, 39, 87-90.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Abramowitz, A.I. , Alexander, B. , & Gunning, M. ( 2006b). Incumbency, redistricting, and the decline of competition in U.S. House elections. Journal of Politics, 68, 75-88.
Google Scholar
Ai, C. , & Norton, E.C. ( 2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80, 123-129.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ansolabehere, S. , & Snyder, J.M., Jr. (2002). The incumbency advantage in U.S. elections: An analysis of state and federal offices, 1942-2000. Election Law Journal, 1, 315-338.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Ansolabehere, S. , Snyder, J.M., Jr. , & Stewart, C., III. (2000). Old voters, new voters, and the personal vote: Using redistricting to measure the incumbency advantage. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 17-34.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Barone, M. , & Cohen, R.E. ( 2003). The almanac of American politics 2004. Washington, DC: National Journal.
Google Scholar
Black, G.S. ( 1972). A theory of political ambition: Career choices and the role of structural incentives. American Political Science Review, 66, 144-159.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Box-Steffensmeier, J.M. ( 1996). A dynamic analysis of the role of war chests in campaign strategy. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 352-371.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Cain, B.E. , Ferejohn, J.A. , & Fiorina, M.P. ( 1987). The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Carson, J.L. ( 2003). Strategic interaction and candidate competition in U.S. House elections: Empirical applications of probit and strategic probit models . Political Analysis, 11, 368-380.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Carson, J.L. ( 2005). Strategy, selection, and candidate competition in U.S . House and Senate elections. Journal of Politics, 67, 1-28.
Google Scholar
Carson, J.L. , & Crespin, M.H. ( 2004). The effect of state redistricting methods on electoral competition in United States House of Representatives races. State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 4, 455-469.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Carson, J.L. , Engstrom, E.J. , & Roberts, J.M. ( 2006). Redistricting, candidate entry, and the politics of nineteenth-century U.S. House elections. American Journal of Political Science , 50, 283-293.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Congressional Quarterly. (1973). Congressional districts in the 1970s . Washington, DC: Author.
Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. (1983). Congressional districts in the 1980s . Washington, DC: Author.
Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly. (1993). Congressional districts in the 1990s: A portrait of America. Washington, DC: Author.
Google Scholar
Cox, G.W. , & Katz, J.N. ( 2002). Elbridge Gerry’s Salamander: The electoral consequences of the reapportionment revolution. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Crespin, M.H. ( 2005). Using geographic information systems to measure district change, 2000-2002. Political Analysis, 13, 253-260.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Dahl, R.A. ( 1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Desposato, S.W. , & Petrocik, J.R. (2003). The variable incumbency advantage: New Voters, redistricting, and the personal vote. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 18-32.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Gelman, A. , & King, G. ( 1994). Enhancing democracy through legislative redistricting . American Political Science Review, 88, 541-559.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Glazer, A. , Grofman, B. , & Robbins, M. ( 1987). Partisan and incumbency effects of 1970s congressional redistricting. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 680-707.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Griffin, J.D. ( 2006). Electoral competition and democratic responsiveness: A defense of the marginality hypothesis. Journal of Politics , 68, 911-921.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Grofman, B. , & Brunell, T.L. ( 2005). The art of the dummymander: The impact of recent redistrictings on the Partisan makeup of southern house seats. In P. F. Galderisi (Ed.), Redistricting in the new millennium (pp. 183-199). Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Google Scholar
Hetherington, M.J. , Larson, B. , & Globetti, S. ( 2003). The redistricting cycle and strategic candidate decisions in U.S. House races. Journal of Politics, 65, 1221-1234.
Google Scholar | ISI
Jacobson, G.C. ( 1987). The marginals never vanished: Incumbency and competition in elections to the U.S. House of Representatives, 1952-82. American Journal of Political Science, 31, 126-141.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jacobson, G.C. ( 1989). Strategic politicians and the dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946-86. American Political Science Review, 83, 773-793.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jacobson, G.C. ( 2003). Terror, terrain, and turnout: Explaining the 2002 midterm elections. Political Science Quarterly, 118, 1-22.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Jacobson, G.C. , & Kernell, S. ( 1981). Strategy and choice in congressional elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Google Scholar
Kahn, K.F. , & Kenney, P.J. ( 1999). The spectacle of U.S. Senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Kam, C.K. ( 2006). Political campaigns and open-minded thinking. Journal of Politics, 68, 931-945.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
King, G. ( 1989). Representation through legislative redistricting: A stochastic model. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 787-824.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
King, G. , Tomz, M. , & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 347-361.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lublin, D. , & McDonald, M.P. (2006). Is it time to draw the line? The impact of redistricting on competition in state house elections . Election Law Journal, 5, 144-157.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lyons, M. , & Galderisi, P.F. (1995). Incumbency, reapportionment, and U.S. House redistricting. Political Research Quarterly , 48, 857-871.
Google Scholar | ISI
Maestas, C.D. , Fulton, S. , Maisel, L.S. , & Stone, W.J. ( 2006). When to risk it? Institutions, ambitions, and the decision to run for the U.S. House. American Political Science Review , 100, 195-208.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Maisel, L.S. , Maestas, C.D. , & Stone, W.J. ( 2005). The impact of redistricting on candidate emergence. In T. E. Mann & B. E. Cain (Eds.), Party lines: Competition, partisanship, and congressional redistricting (pp. 31-50). Washington, DC : Brookings Institution.
Google Scholar
McDonald, M.P. ( 2004). A comparative analysis of redistricting institutions in the United States, 2001-02. State Politics and Policy Quarterly , 4, 371-395.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
McDonald, M.P. ( 2006a). Drawing the line on district competition. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39, 91-94.
Google Scholar | Crossref
McDonald, M.P. ( 2006b). Re-drawing the line on district competition. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39, 99-102.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Mercurio, J. ( 2002, March 11). Between the lines. Roll call .
Google Scholar
Niemi, R.G. , & Abramowitz, A.I. (1994). Partisan redistricting and the 1992 congressional elections. Journal of Politics , 56, 811-817.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Niemi, R.G. , & Winsky, L.R. ( 1992). The persistence of partisan redistricting effects in congressional elections in the 1970s and 1980s. Journal of Politics, 54, 565-572.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Norton, E.C. , Wang, H. , & Ai, C. ( 2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal, 4, 154-167.
Google Scholar
Owen, G. , & Grofman, B.N. ( 1988). Optimal partisan gerrymandering. Political Geography Quarterly, 7, 5-22.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Schumpeter, J.A. ( 1976). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Google Scholar
Squire, P. ( 1985). Results of partisan redistricting in seven U.S. states during the 1970s. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10, 259-266.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Squire, P. ( 1995). The partisan consequences of congressional redistricting . American Politics Quarterly, 23, 229-240.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Stein, R.M. , & Bickers, K.N. ( 1995). Perpetuating the pork barrel: Policy subsystems and American democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Stone, W.J. , & Maisel, L.S. ( 2003). The not-so-simple calculus of winning: Potential U.S. House candidates’ nomination and general election prospects. Journal of Politics, 65, 951-977.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sulkin, T. ( 2005). Issue politics in Congress. New York : Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Swain, J.W. , Borrelli, S.A. , & Reed, B.C. ( 1998). Partisan consequences of the post-1990 redistricting for the U.S. House of Representatives. Political Research Quarterly, 51, 945-967.
Google Scholar | ISI
Tomz, M. , Wittenberg, J. , & King, G. ( 2003, January). CLARIFY: Software for interpreting and presenting statistical results. Version 2.1. Stanford University, University of Wisconsin, and Harvard University. Retrieved November 1, 2007, from http://gking.harvard.edu/
Google Scholar
Tufte, E.R. ( 1973). The relationship between seats and votes in two-party systems. American Political Science Review, 67, 540-554.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here

Your Access Options


Purchase

APR-article-ppv for $37.50
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $342.66

Cookies Notification

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Find out more.
Top