![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Many political pundits characterized the 2010 election as a referendum on President Obama’s health care reform law. The political science literature on issue voting, however, does not consistently demonstrate that these types of policy evaluations are central to citizens’ vote choices. Moreover, existing theories suggest different predictions about how the health care reform issue would affect elections across different levels of government. Studying data from the 2010 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES), the analysis indicates that those opposed to health care reform were less likely to vote for Democratic candidates in the U.S. House, the U.S. Senate, state gubernatorial, and state attorneys general contests, controlling for partisan affiliation, political ideology, perceptions of the economy, and evaluations of other salient policy issues. These findings suggest that, across the board, Democrats were penalized for their support of health care reform, and more generally provide evidence of the role of noneconomic issue voting in U.S. elections.
References
|
Abbe, O. G., Goodliffe, J., Herrnson, P. S., Patterson, K. D. (2003). Agenda setting in Congressional elections: The impact of issues and campaigns on voting behavior. Political Research Quarterly, 56, 419-430. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Alvarez, R. M., Nagler, J. (1995). Economics, issues, and the Perot candidacy: Voter choice in the 1992 election. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 714-744. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Alvarez, R. M., Nagler, J. (1998). Economics, entitlements, and social issues: Voter choice in the 1996 presidential election. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 1346-1363. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Ansolabehere, S. (2010). Cooperative Congressional Election Survey: Common content 2010. Retrieved from http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/cces/home Google Scholar | |
|
Ansolabehere, S., Rodden, J., Snyder, J. M. (2008). The strength of issues: Using multiple measures to gauge preference stability, ideological constraint, and issue voting. American Political Science Review, 102, 215-232. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Ansolabehere, S., Schaffner, B. F. (2011). Re-examining the validity of different survey modes for measuring public opinion in the US: Findings from a 2010 multi-mode comparison (CCES Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: MIT. Google Scholar | |
|
Ansolabehere, S., Snyder, J. M. (2002). The incumbency advantage in US elections: An analysis of state and federal offices, 1942-2000. Election Law Journal, 1, 315-338. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Arceneaux, K. (2006). The federal face of voting: Are elected officials held accountable for the functions relevant to their office? Political Psychology, 27, 731-754. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Atkeson, L. R., Partin, R. W. (1995). Economic and referendum voting: A comparison of gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Political Science Review, 89, 99-107. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Best, S. J. (2010). Why Democrats lost the House to Republicans. CBS News. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com Google Scholar | |
|
Blendon, R. J., Benson, J. M. (2010). Health care in the 2010 Congressional election. New England Journal of Medicine, 10, 30. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Brown, A. (2010). Are governors responsible for the state economy? Partnership, blame, and divided federalism. The Journal of Politics, 72, 605-615. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Carsey, T., Wright, G. C. (1998). State and national factors in gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 994-1002. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Chubb, J. E. (1988). Institutions, the economy, and the dynamics of state elections. American Political Science Review, 82, 133-154. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Conover, P. J., Feldman, S. (1989). Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: Campaigns, cues, and inference processes. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 912-940. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Cook, E. A., Jelen, T. G., Wilcox, C. (1992). Between two absolutes: American public opinion and the politics of abortion. Boulder, CO: Westview. Google Scholar | |
|
Cook, E. A., Jelen, T. G., Wilcox, C. (1994). Issue voting in gubernatorial elections: Abortion and post-Webster politics. The Journal of Politics, 56, 187-199. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Cummins, J. (2009). Issue voting and crime in gubernatorial elections. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 632-651. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Donovan, T., Tolbert, C. J., Smith, D. A. (2008). Priming presidential votes by direct democracy. The Journal of Politics, 70, 1217-1231. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fair, R. C. (1978). The effect of economic events on votes for president. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 159-173. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fiorina, M. P. (1978). Economic retrospective voting in American national elections: A micro-analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 22, 426-443. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Fowler, E. F., Ridout, T. N. (2011). Advertising trends in 2010. The Forum, 8(4). Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Herrnson, P. S., Curry, J. M. (2011). Issue voting and partisan defections in Congressional elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36, 281-307. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hibbing, J. R., Alford, J. R. (1981). The electoral impact of economic conditions: Who is held responsible? American Journal of Political Science, 25, 423-439. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Holbrook, T., Clouse, C., Weinschenk, A. C. (2011). Bringing the president back in: The collapse of Lehman Brothers and the evolution of retrospective voting in the 2008 presidential election. Political Research Quarterly. Accessed on June 16, 2011. doi: 10.1177/106591291139805110.1177/1065912911398051 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Howell, S. E., Sims, R. T. (1993). Abortion attitudes and the Louisiana governor’s election. American Politics Research, 21, 54-64. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Hurley, P. A., Hill, K. Q. (1980). The prospects for issue-voting in contemporary Congressional elections: An assessment of citizen awareness and representation. American Politics Quarterly, 8, 425-448. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Iyengar, S., Kinder, D. R. (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Kaplan, R., House, B. (2010, November 3). Boehner “laying the groundwork” for healthcare repeal. National Journal. Retrieved from http://nationaljournal.com/politics/boehner-laying-the-groundwork-for-healthcare-repeal-20101103 Google Scholar | |
|
Key, V. O. (1966). The responsible electorate. New York, NY: Vintage. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kiewiet, D. R. (1983). Macroeconomics and micropolitics: The electoral effects of economic issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Kinder, D. R. (1998). Opinion and action in the realm of politics. In Handbook of social psychology (pp. 778-867). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Kramer, G. H. (1971). Short term fluctuations in US voting behavior: 1896-1964. American Political Science Review, 65, 131-143. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Lewis-Beck, M. S., Stegmaier, M. (2007). Economic models of voting. In Dalton, R. J., Klingemann, H. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political behavior (pp. 513-538). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Miller, J. M., Krosnick, J. A. (2000). News media impact on the ingredients of presidential evaluations: Politically knowledgeable citizens are guided by a trusted source. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 295-309. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Nicholson, S. P. (2005). Voting the agenda: Candidates, elections, and ballot propositions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Niemi, R. G., Stanley, H. W., Vogel, R. (1995). State economies and state taxes: Do voters hold governors accountable? American Journal of Political Science, 39, 936-957. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Peltzman, S. (1987). Economic conditions and gubernatorial elections. American Economic Review, 77, 293-297. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Petrocik, J. R. (1991). Divided government: Is it all in the campaigns? In Cox, G. W., Kernell, S. (Eds.), The politics of divided government (pp. 13-38). Boulder, CO: Westview. Google Scholar | |
|
Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Popkin, S. L. (1991). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Rahn, W. M. (1993). The role of partisan stereotypes in information processing about political candidates. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 472-496. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rivers, D. (2007, August). Sampling for web surveys. Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings, Salt Lake City, UT. Google Scholar | |
|
Samuelson, D., Bravender, R. (2010). Democrats’ day of reckoning comes for climate vote. Politico. Retrieved from http://www.politico.com Google Scholar | |
|
Simon, D. M. (1989). Presidents, governors, and electoral accountability. The Journal of Politics, 51, 286-304. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Simon, D. M., Ostrom, C. W., Marra, R. F. (1991). The president, referendum voting, and subnational elections in the United States. American Political Science Review, 85, 1177-1192. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Smith, D. A., Tolbert, C. J. (2010). Direct democracy, public opinion, and candidate choice. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74, 85-108. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Stein, R. M. (1990). Economic voting for governor and US senator: The electoral consequences of federalism. The Journal of Politics, 52, 29-53. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Svoboda, C. J. (1995). Retrospective voting in gubernatorial elections: 1982 and 1986. Political Research Quarterly, 48, 135-150. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Teixeira, R., Halpin, J. (2010). Election results fueled by jobs crisis and voter apathy among progressives. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress. Google Scholar | |
|
Tufte, E. (1975). Determinants of the outcomes of midterm Congressional elections. American Political Science Review, 69, 812-826. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., White, I. K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96, 75-90. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Vavreck, L. (2009). The message matters: The economy and presidential campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Vavreck, L., Rivers, D. (2008). The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18, 355-366. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Weiss, D. (2010). A shellacking, or something. Campaigns and Elections. Retrieved from http://www.campaignsandelections.com Google Scholar | |
|
Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref |
