![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
This article investigates whether constituents are able to accurately infer their senators’ votes when the senator frequently votes against the party line. We find that when senators repeatedly vote against the party line, constituents’ ability to correctly identify their senators’ votes drops precipitously while levels of misinformation rise. We then show that citizens represented by senators who tend to vote against the party line are also less able to connect their policy positions with their evaluations of those senators. These findings indicate that there is substantial variation across senators in the ability of their constituents to hold them accountable for their votes while in office. Constituents simply know less about the positions taken by moderate senators and have a harder time aligning their levels of policy agreement with a senator with their evaluation of that senator if she frequently votes against her party.
References
|
Abramowitz, A. I. (1988). Explaining Senate election outcomes. American Political Science Review, 82, 385-403. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Alvarez, R. M., Gronke, P. (1996). Constituents and legislators: Learning about the Persian Gulf War Resolution. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 21, 105-127. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
American Political Science Association, Committee on Political Parties . (1950). Toward a more responsible two-party system. American Political Science Review, 44(3, Supplement), 1-98. Google Scholar | |
|
Ansolabehere, S. (2010a). CCES common content, 2006 (Harvard Dataverse, V4). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/14002 Google Scholar | |
|
Ansolabehere, S. (2010b). CCES, common content, 2008 (Harvard Dataverse, V6). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/14003 Google Scholar | |
|
Ansolabehere, S. (2012). CCES common content, 2010 (Harvard Dataverse, V3). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/17705 Google Scholar | |
|
Ansolabehere, S., Jones, P. E. (2010). Constituents’ responses to congressional roll call voting. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 583-597. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Ansolabehere, S., Schaffner, B. (2013). CCES common content, 2012 (Harvard Dataverse, V7). Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1902.1/21447 Google Scholar | |
|
Arnold, R. D. (1990). The logic of congressional action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Atkeson, L. R., Partin, R. W. (1995). Economic and referendum voting: A comparison of gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Political Science Review, 89, 99-107. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Bafumi, J., Herron, M. C. (2010). Leapfrog representation and extremism: A study of American voters and their members in Congress. American Political Science Review, 104, 519-542. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Barabas, J., Pollock, W., Wachtel, J. (2012, August). Rewarding representation: The effects of roll-call information on voting for congressional incumbents. Paper presented at the APSA Political Communication Pre-Conference Meeting, Baton Rouge, LA. Google Scholar | |
|
Beneson, B. (2006, October 30). Election 2006: Senate’s balance of power in four close races. CQ Weekly, pp. 2870-2871. Retrieved from http://library.cqpress.com/cqweekly/ Google Scholar | |
|
Binder, S., Maltzman, F., Sigelman, L. (1998). Senators’ home-state reputations: Why do constituents love a Bill Cohen so much more than an Al D’Amato? Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23, 545-560. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Brady, D. W., Cogan, J. F., Gaines, B. J., Rivers, D. (1996). The perils of presidential support: How the Republicans took the House in the 1994 midterm elections. Political Behavior, 18, 345-367. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Brown, A. R., Jacobson, G. C. (2008). Party, performance, and strategic politicians: The dynamics of elections for senator and governor in 2006. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 8, 384-409. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Canes-Wrone, B., Brady, D. W., Cogan, J. F. (2002). Out of step, out of office: Electoral accountability and House members’ voting. American Political Science Review, 96, 127-140. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Carsey, T. M., Wright, G. C. (1998). State and national factors in gubernatorial and senatorial elections. American Journal of Political Science, 42, 994-1002. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Carson, J. L., Koger, G., Lebo, M. J., Young, E. (2010). The electoral costs of party loyalty in Congress. American Journal of Political Science, 54, 598-616. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Conover, P. J., Feldman, S. (1989). Candidate perception in an ambiguous world: Campaigns, cues, and inference processes. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 912-940. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dancey, L., Sheagley, G. (2013). Heuristics behaving badly: Party cues and voter knowledge. American Journal of Political Science, 57, 312-325. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Delli Carpini, M. X., Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Erikson, R. S. (1971). The electoral impact of congressional roll call voting. American Political Science Review, 65, 1018-1032. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Feldman, S., Conover, P. J. (1983). Candidates, issues and voters: The role of inference in political perception. The Journal of Politics, 45, 810-839. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fiorina, M. P. (1980). The decline of collective responsibility in American politics. Daedalus, 109(3), 25-45. Google Scholar | ISI | |
|
Fortunato, D., Stevenson, R. T. (2014). Heuristics in context. Retrieved from http://www.davidfortunato.com/senatePaper.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Fridkin, K. L., Kenney, P. J. (2011). The role of candidate traits in campaigns. The Journal of Politics, 73, 61-73. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Harbridge, L., Malhotra, N. (2011). Electoral incentives and partisan conflict in congress: Evidence from survey experiments. American Journal of Political Science, 55, 494-510. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hetherington, M. J. (2001). Resurgent mass partisanship: The role of elite polarization. The American Political Science Review, 95, 619-631. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Highton, B. (2008). Job approval and Senate election outcomes in the United States. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 33, 245-262. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Hurley, P. A., Hill, K. Q. (1980). The prospects for issue-voting in contemporary congressional elections: An assessment of citizen awareness of representation. American Politics Quarterly, 8, 425-448. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Hutchings, V. L. (2001). Political context, issue salience, and selective attentiveness: Constituent knowledge of the Clarence Thomas confirmation vote. The Journal of Politics, 63, 846-868. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Jacobson, G. C. (2013). The politics of congressional elections (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. Google Scholar | |
|
Joesten, D. A., Stone, W. J. (2014). Reassessing proximity voting: Expertise, party, and choice in congressional elections. The Journal of Politics, 76, 740-753. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Jones, P. E. (2011). Which buck stops here? Accountability for policy positions and policy outcomes in congress. The Journal of Politics, 73, 764-782. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Jones, P. E. (2013). The effect of political competition on democratic accountability. Political Behavior, 35, 481-515. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Kahn, K. F., Kenney, P. J. (1999). The spectacle of U.S. Senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Kastellec, J. P., Lax, J. R., Phillips, J. H. (2010). Public opinion and Senate confirmation of Supreme Court nominees. The Journal of Politics, 72, 767-784. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Koger, G., Lebo, M. J. (2012). Strategic party government and the 2010 elections. American Politics Research, 40, 927-945. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Leoni, E. L. (2009). Analyzing multiple surveys: Results from Monte Carlo experiments. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.180.2174&rep=rep1&type=pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Levendusky, M. S. (2010). Clearer cues, more consistent voters: A benefit of elite polarization. Political Behavior, 32, 111-131. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Long, J. S., Freese, J. (2014). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata (3rd ed.). College Station, TX: Stata Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Lupu, N. (2014). Party polarization and mass partisanship: A comparative perspective. Political Behavior, 37, 331-356. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mann, T. E., Ornstein, N. J. (2012). It’s even worse than it looks: How the American constitutional system collided with the new politics of extremism. New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Miller, W. E., Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57, 45-56. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mitchell, D. G. (2009). Perceptions and realities of issue voting. In Mondak, J. J., Mitchell, D. G. (Eds.), Fault Lines: Why Republicans Lost Congress (pp. 111-127). New York: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Nyhan, B., McGhee, E., Sides, J., Masket, S., Greene, S. (2012). One vote out of step? The effects of salient roll call votes in the 2010 election. American Politics Research, 40, 844-879. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Primo, D. M., Jacobsmeier, M. L., Milyo, J. (2007). Estimating the impact of state policies and institutions with mixed-level data. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7, 446-459. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Ramirez, M.D. (2009). The dynamics of partisan conflict on congressional approval. American Journal of Political Science, 53, 681-694. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Schaffner, B. F., Schiller, W. J., Sellers, P. J. (2003). Tactical and contextual determinants of U.S. Senators’ approval ratings. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 38, 203-223. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Schenker, N., Gentleman, J. F. (2001). On judging the significance of differences by examining the overlap between confidence intervals. The American Statistician, 55, 182-186. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Simas, E. N. (2013). Proximity voting in the 2010 U.S. House elections. Electoral Studies, 32, 708-717. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Sulkin, T., Testa, P., Usry, K. (2015). What gets rewarded? Legislative activity and constituency approval. Political Research Quarterly, 68, 690-702. doi:10.1177/1065912915608699 Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Tomz, M., Van Houweling, R. P. (2009). The electoral implications of candidate ambiguity. American Political Science Review, 103, 83-98. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wilson, J. M. (2012, September). Testing the limits of “representation”: The effects of citizen biases on legislative accountability. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA. Google Scholar | |
|
Wilson, J. M., Gronke, P. (2000). Concordance and projection in citizen perceptions of congressional roll-call voting. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 445-467. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wolpert, R. M., Gimpel, J. G. (1997). Information, recall, and accountability: The electorate’s response to the Clarence Thomas nomination. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 22, 535-550. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Wright, G. C., Berkman, M. B. (1986). Candidates and policy in United States Senate elections. American Political Science Review, 80, 567-588. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
