![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Previous research on televised presidential debates tends to minimize their effectiveness as agents of mass attitude change, suggesting that they serve merely to reinforce existing preferences. Much of this work, though, stems from analyses of vote decisions during the closing stages of the general election campaign when preferences are anchored by 9 months of prior information. Using an experimental design that controls for debate viewership, we assess the impact of an early primary season debate—when voters possess limited information and potentially malleable political attitudes—on a broad range of political predispositions. The results demonstrate that debates possess the capacity to influence viewers' campaign engagement, issue appraisals, and candidate evaluations, suggesting that the impact of debates may be dramatically understated.
|
Bartels, L. M.
(1988). Presidential primaries and the dynamics of public choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Berke, R. L.
(1995, October 12). G.O.P. candidates try to raise voices above Dole's in TV debate. New York Times, p. A16. Google Scholar | |
|
Birdsell, D.
(1994). What should debates be? Standards of public discourse. In A. H. Miller & B. E. Gronbeck (Eds.), Presidential campaigns and American self-images (pp. 118-137). Boulder, CO: Westview. Google Scholar | |
|
Block, J.
(1965). The challenge of response sets. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. Google Scholar | |
|
Campbell, D. T.
, & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally. Google Scholar | |
|
Drew, E.
(1985). Campaign journal: The political events of 1983-1984. New York: Macmillan. Google Scholar | |
|
Geer, J. G.
(1988). The effects of presidential debates on the electorate's preferences for candidates. American Politics Quarterly, 16, 486-501. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Germond, J.
(1981). Blue smoke and mirrors: How Reagan won, and why Carter lost the election of 1980. New York: Viking. Google Scholar | |
|
Gillespie, M. W.
(1977). Log-linear techniques and the regression analysis of dummy dependent variables. Sociological Methods and Research, 6, 103-122. Google Scholar | |
|
Goldman, P. L.
, & Mathews, T. (1989). The quest for the presidency, 1988. New York: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar | |
|
Hellweg, S. A.
, Pfau, M. , & Brydon, S. R. (1992). Televised presidential debates: Advocacy in contemporary America. New York: Praeger. Google Scholar | |
|
Holbrook, T. M.
(1994). The behavioral consequences of vice-presidential debates: Does the undercard have any punch. American Politics Quarterly, 22, 469-482. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Jamieson, K. H.
, & Birdsell, D. S. (1988). Presidential debates: The challenge of creating an informed electorate. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Just, M. R.
, Crigler, A. N. , Alger, D. E. , Cook, T. E. , Kern, M. , & West, D. M. (1996). Crosstalk: Citizens, candidates and the media in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Kraus, S.
(Ed.). (1962). The great debates: Background, perspective, effects. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Kraus, S.
(Ed.). (1979). The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Lanoue, D. J.
(1991). The turning point: Viewers' reactions to the second 1988 presidential debate. American Politics Quarterly, 19, 80-95. Google Scholar | |
|
Lanoue, D. J.
(1992). One that made a difference: Cognitive consistency, political knowledge, and the 1980 presidential debate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 168-184. Google Scholar | |
|
Lanoue, D. J.
, & Schrott, P. R. (1989). The effects of primary season debates on public opinion. Political Behavior, 11, 289-306. Google Scholar | |
|
McGraw, K. M.
, & Hoekstra, V. (1994). Experimentation in political science: Historical trends and future directions. In M. X. Delli Carpini , L. Huddy , & R. Y. Shapiro (Eds.), Research in micropolitics volume 4: New directions in political psychology (pp. 3-29). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Google Scholar | |
|
McGuire, W. J.
(1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed. pp. 233-346). New York: Random House. Google Scholar | |
|
Patterson
. (1993). Out of order. New York: Vintage Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Petty, R.
, & Cacioppo, J. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown. Google Scholar | |
|
Sears, D. O.
(1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influence of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530. Google Scholar | |
|
Sears, D. O.
, & Chaffee, S. H. (1979). Uses and effects of the 1976 debates: An overview of empirical studies. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford, 1976 (pp. 223-261). Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Semetko, H. A.
, Blumler, J. G. , Gurevitch, M. , & Weaver, D. H. (1991). The formation of campaign agendas. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Google Scholar | |
|
Yawn, M.
, Ellsworth, K. , Beatty, B. , & Kahn, K. F. (1998). How a presidential primary debate changed attitudes of audience members. Political Behavior, 20, 155-181. Google Scholar |
