Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online September 8, 2016

Towards Mitigating Teenagers’ Distracted Driving Behaviors: Comparison of Real-Time and Post-Drive Feedback in a Simulator Study

Abstract

Distraction contributes significantly to teens’ crash risks. Previous studies show that feedback can help mitigate distraction among young and adult drivers; however, the type of feedback that is effective for teenagers remains unexamined. This paper investigates whether real-time and post-drive feedback can mitigate teens’ driver distraction and reports preliminary findings from an ongoing simulator study. Data reported was collected in a between-subjects experiment with three conditions: real-time (n= 8), post-drive (n= 8), and no feedback (n= 9). Real-time feedback was provided as auditory warnings when teens had long offroad glances (>2 sec). Post-drive feedback was an end-of-trip report on teens’ off-road glances and driving performance provided on an in-vehicle display. Compared to no feedback, real-time feedback resulted in significantly smaller number of long off-road glances (>2 sec), smaller average duration of off-road glances, and smaller standard deviation of lane position. The effects observed for post-drive feedback were relatively minor.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

AAMI. (2012). Young Driver’s Annual Road Safety Index. Australia: AAMI.
Atchley P., Atwood S., Boulton A. (2011). The choice to text and drive in younger drivers: behavior may shape attitude. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(1), 134–142.
Carter P. M., Bingham C. R., Zakrajsek J. S., Shope J. T., Sayer T. B. (2014). Social norms and risk perception: predictors of distracted driving behavior among novice adolescent drivers. Journal of Adolescent Health, 54(5), S32–S41.
Klauer S. G., Dingus T. A., Neale V. L., Sudweeks J., Ramsey D. J. (2006). The Impact of Driver Inattention on Near-crash/Crash Risk: An Analysis Using the 100-car Naturalistic Driving Study Data, DOT HS 810 594. Washington D.C.
Donmez B., Boyle L., Lee J. D. (2009). Designing feedback to mitigate distraction. In Regan M. A., Lee J. D., Young K. L. (Eds.), Driver Distraction: Theory, Effects, and Mitigation (pp. 519–532). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Donmez B., Boyle L. N., Lee J. D. (2007). Safety implications of providing real-time feedback to distracted drivers. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 39(3), 581–590.
Donmez B., Boyle L. N., Lee J. D. (2008). Mitigating driver distraction with retrospective and concurrent feedback. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 40(2), 776–786.
Ferguson S. A. (2003). Other high-risk factors for young drivers—how graduated licensing does, doesn’t, or could address them. Journal of Safety Research, 34(1), 71–77.
Forehand R., Wierson M. (1993). The role of developmental factors in planning behavioral interventions for children: Disruptive behavior as an example. Behavior Therapy, 24(1), 117–141.
Horrey W. J., Wickens C. D. (2007). In-vehicle glance duration: Distributions, tails, and model of crash risk. Transportation Research Record, 2018(1), 22–28.
Igra V. C. E. I. Jr (1996). Theories of Adolescent Risk-Taking Behavior. In DiClemente R. J., Hansen W. B., Ponton L. E. (Eds.), Handbook of Adolescent Health Risk Behavior (pp. 35–51). Springer US.
Lee J. D., Moeckli J., Brown T., Roberts S. C., Schwarz C., Yekhshatyan L., Davis C. (2013). Distraction Detection and Mitigation Through Driver Feedback (No. DOT HS 811 547A). National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Martens M. H. (2007). The danger of incorrect expectations in driving: the failure to respond. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. Stevenson, Washington.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2013a). Distracted Driving2011 (No. DOT HS 811 737).
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2013b). Distraction Detection and Mitigation Through Driver Feedback (No. DOT HS 811 547A).
Pradhan A., Simons-Morton B., Lee S., Klauer S. (2011). Hazard perception and distraction in novice drivers: Effects of 12 months driving experience. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design. Iowa City, Iowa.
SAE International. (2015). Operational Definitions of Driving Performance Measures and Statistics: SAE J 2944.
Shope J. T., Bingham C. R. (2008). Teen driving: Motor-vehicle crashes and factors that contribute. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(3, Supplement), S261–S271.
Sivak M. (1996). The information that drivers use: is it indeed 90% visual? Perception, 25(9), 1081–1089.
Subramanian R. (2012). Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes as a Leading Cause of Death in the United States, 2008 and 2009. Washington, DC. NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics and Analysis.
Weilenmann A., Larsson C. (2002). Wireless World. In Brown B., Green N. (Eds.), (pp. 92–107). New York, NY, USA: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.
Williams A. F. (2003). Teenage drivers: patterns of risk. Journal of Safety Research, 34(1), 5–15.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: September 8, 2016
Issue published: September 2016

Rights and permissions

© 2016 by Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Maryam Merrikhpour
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto
Birsen Donmez
Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 109

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

HFES members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

HFES members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB