Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 17, 2014

Correlations among self-reported driving characteristics and simulated driving performance measures

Abstract

Following a driving simulator experiment investigating anticipatory competence in driving, participants were asked to rate themselves on driving characteristics that are potentially relevant to anticipatory competence. Significant correlations were found among multiple of these characteristics. Furthermore, all participants also completed the Manchester Driving Behaviour Questionnaire (DBQ), so that correlations between these subjective driving characteristics and DBQ categories could also be investigated. Findings showed that both subjective measures were generally aligned in that the DBQ categories correlated with the subjective characteristics describing them. However, no evidence could be found that participants judging themselves as safe drivers kept longer headways and larger times to collision, and no significant correlations were observed between subjective ratings of fuel-efficiency and fuel-consumption observed in the simulated drive. These findings suggest that caution should be taken when using self-reported driving characteristics to predict actual performance, and future research should further investigate the relation between self-reported measures and simulator performance measures.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Dziuban C. D., Shirkey E. C. (1974). When is a correlation matrix appropriate for factor analysis? Some decision rules. Psychological Bulletin, 81(6), 358–361.
Fisher D. L., Laurie N. E., Glaser R., Connerney K., Pollatsek A., Duffy S. A., Brock J. (2002). Use of a fixed-base driving simulator to evaluate the effects of experience and PC-based risk awareness training on drivers’ decisions. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 44(2).
Fuller R. (1984). A conceptualization of driver behavior as threat avoidance. Ergonomics, 27, 1139–1155.
Jackson L., Chapman P., Crundall D. (2009). What happens next? Predicting other road users’ behaviour as a function of driving experience and processing time. Ergonomics, 52(2), 154–164.
Lajunen T., Summala H. (2003). Can we trust self-reports of driving? Effects of impression management on driver behaviour questionnaire responses. Transportation Research Part F, 97–107.
Lawton R., Parker D., Manstead A. S. R., Stradling S. (1997). The role of affect in predicting social behaviours: The case of road traffic violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 27, 1258–1276.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2006). Traffic safety facts 2004: A compilation of motor vehicle crash data from the fatality analysis reporting system and the general estimates system. Washington, DC.
Paulhus D. L., Reid D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 307–317.
Pollatsek A., Narayanaan V., Pradhan A., Fisher D. L. (2006). Using eye movements to evaluate a PC-based risk awareness and perception training program on a driving simulator. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 48(3), 447–464.
Powell D. (2008). Interview: Extreme driver - with a difference. New Scientiest, 200(2679), 42–43.
Reason R., Manstread A., Stradling S., Baxter J., Campbell K. (1990). Errors and violations on the roads: A real distinction? Ergonomics, 33(10-11), 1315–1332.
Stahl P., Donmez B., Jamieson G. A. (in press). Anticipation in driving: The role of experience in the efficacy of pre-event conflict cues. IEEE Transactions on Human Machine Systems.
Stahl P., Donmez B., Jamieson G. A. (2013). Anticipatory driving competence: motivation, definition & modeling. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (286–291). Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Thisjen R., Hofman T., Ham J. (2014). Ecodriving acceptance: An experimental study on anticipation behavior of truck drivers. Transportation Research Part F, 22, 249–260.
Williams A. F., Shabanova V. I. (2003). Responsibility of drivers, by age and gender, for motor-vehicle crash deaths. Journal of Safety Research, 34(5), 527–531.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 17, 2014
Issue published: September 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Request permissions for this article.

History

Issue published: September 2014
Published online: October 17, 2014

Authors

Affiliations

Patrick Stahl
University of Toronto, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada
Birsen Donmez
University of Toronto, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada
Greg A. Jamieson
University of Toronto, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Toronto, ON, Canada

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 50

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Articles citing this one

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

HFES members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

HFES members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub