Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 17, 2014

EMG provides an earlier glimpse into the effects of cognitive distraction on brake motor response

Abstract

A driver’s ability to quickly perceive and respond to hazards is critical for traffic safety. With limited cognitive resources, any added distractions are likely to increase response times. This study analyzed the effect of two cognitive distraction tasks, 1-back and countdown, on total brake-response time and its subcomponents: perception and leg movement times (n=6). Participants sat in a stationary vehicle and responded to a light stimulus by moving their foot from the accelerator to the brake pedal as quickly as possible. Electromyography (EMG) recordings of the lower leg muscle provided earlier detection of movement onset compared to accelerator pedal motion. Performing a cognitive task was found to increase perception and total brake-response time compared to the baseline condition. There were no significant differences observed in leg movement time while performing either of the distraction tasks versus the baseline. Implications for areas of improvement and future works are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Bellinger D., Budde B., Machida M., Richardson G., Berg W. (2009). The effect of cellular telephone conversation and music listening on response time in braking. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 12(6), 441–451.
Botwinick J., Thompson L. (1966). Premotor and motor components of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 9–15.
Broen N. L., Chiang D. P. (1996). Braking response times for 100 drivers in the avoidance of an unexpected obstacle as measured in a driving simulator. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 40, 900–904.
Caird J., Willness C., Steel P., Scialfa C. (2008). A metaanalysis of the effects of cell phones on driver performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 40(4), 1282–1293.
Cavanagh P. R., Komi P. V. (1979). Electromechanical delay in human skeletal muscle under concentric and eccentric contractions. European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 42(3), 159–163.
Consiglio W., Driscoll P., Witte M., Berg W. (2003). Effect of cellular telephone conversations and other potential interference on reaction time in a braking response. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35(4), 495–500.
Corcos D. M., Gottlieb G. L., Latash M. L., Almeida G. L., Agarwal G. C. (1992). Electromechanical delay: An experimental artifact. Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology: Official Journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology, 2(2), 59–68.
D’Addario P. (2014). Perception-response time to emergency roadway hazards and the effect of cognitive distraction (Master of Applied Science). University of Toronto.
Fitch G., Blanco M., Morgan J., Wharton A. (2010). Driver braking performance to surprise and expected events. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 54, 2075–2080.
Lee J., McGehee D., Brown T., Reyes M. (2002). Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator. Human Factors, 44(2), 314–334.
Luschei E., Saslow C., Glickstein M. (1967). Muscle potentials in reaction time. Experimental Neurology, 18(4), 429–442.
Marques C., Barreiros J., Cabri J., Carita A., Friesecke C., Loehr J. (2008). Does the brake response time of the right leg change after left total knee arthroplasty? A prospective study. The Knee, 15(4), 295–298.
Mehler B., Reimer B., Coughlin J., Dusek J. (2009). Impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2138, 6–12.
Olson P. (1989). Driver perception response time (890731). Presented at the Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA.
Olson P., Sivak M. (1986). Perception-response time to unexpected roadway hazards. Human Factors, 28(1), 91– 96.
Seto Y., Minegishi K., Yang Z., Kobayashi T. (2004). Research on detection of braking reactions in emergency situations. Vehicle System Dynamics, 41, 784–790.
Spehar B., Kolesarić V. (2010). The effects of stimulus context on components of simple reaction time. Review of Psychology, 17(1), 59–67.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 17, 2014
Issue published: September 2014

Rights and permissions

© 2014 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society.
Request permissions for this article.

History

Issue published: September 2014
Published online: October 17, 2014

Authors

Affiliations

Pamela M. D’Addario
Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto
MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists
Birsen Donmez
Department of Mechanical & Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto
Kurt W. Ising
MEA Forensic Engineers & Scientists

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 72

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Articles citing this one

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 9

  1. DECODING OF SIMPLE HAND MOVEMENTS BY FRACTAL ANALYSIS OF ELECTROMYOGRA...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. FRACTAL-BASED CLASSIFICATION OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY (EMG) SIGNAL BETWEEN ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. DECODING OF HAND GESTURES BY FRACTAL ANALYSIS OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY (EMG...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. FRACTAL-BASED CLASSIFICATION OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY (EMG) SIGNAL IN RESPO...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Does cognitive distraction improve or degrade lane keeping performance...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Does Talking on a Cell Phone, With a Passenger, or Dialing Affect Driv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  7. How drivers fail to avoid crashes: A risk-homeostasis/perception-respo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Simulator study of young driver's instinctive response of lower extrem...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Study of Muscle Activation of Driver’s Lower Extremity at the Collisio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

HFES members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

HFES members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub