![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Past research argues that religious commitments shape individuals’ prosocial sentiments, including their generosity and solidarity. But what drives the prosociality of less religious people? Three studies tested the hypothesis that, with fewer religious expectations of prosociality, less religious individuals’ levels of compassion will play a larger role in their prosocial tendencies. In Study 1, religiosity moderated the relationship between trait compassion and prosocial behavior such that compassion was more critical to the generosity of less religious people. In Study 2, a compassion induction increased generosity among less religious individuals but not among more religious individuals. In Study 3, state feelings of compassion predicted increased generosity across a variety of economic tasks for less religious individuals but not among more religious individuals. These results suggest that the prosociality of less religious individuals is driven to a greater extent by levels of compassion than is the prosociality of the more religious.
Keywords
References
|
Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Barclay, P., Willer, R. (2007). Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274, 749–753. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Batson, C. D. (2009). These things called empathy: Eight related but distinct phenomena. In Decety, J., Ickes, W. (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: MIT press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Batson, C. D., Shaw, L. L. (1991). Evidence for altruism: Toward a pluralism of prosocial motives. Psychological Inquiry, 2, 107–122. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Beit-Hallahmi, B. (2009). Morality and immorality among the irreligious. In Zuckerman, P. (Ed.), Atheism and secularity: Volume 1: Issues, concepts, and definitions (pp. 113). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. Google Scholar | |
|
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122–142. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., Gosling, S. D. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical turk. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 3. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Davis, J. A., Smith, T. W. (2005). General social surveys, 1972-2004. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center. Google Scholar | |
|
Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Durkheim, E. (1915). The elementary forms of religious life. New York, NY: Free Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Eisenberg, N., Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., Larkin, G. R. (2003). What good are positive emotions in crises? A prospective study of resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the united states on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 365–376. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Goetz, J. L., Keltner, D., Simon-Thomas, E. (2010). Compassion: An evolutionary analysis and empirical review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 351–374. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Gorsuch, R. L., McFarland, S. G. (1972). Single vs. Multiple-item scales for measuring religious values. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11, 53–64. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Graham, J., Haidt, J. (2010). Beyond beliefs: Religions bind individuals into moral communities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 140–150. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Hout, M., Fischer, C. S. (2002). Why more Americans have no religious preference: Politics and generations. American Sociological Review, 67, 165–190. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods experiments. In Kagel, J. L., Roth, A. E. (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics (pp. 111–194). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Lynn, R., Harvey, J., Nyborg, H. (2009). Average intelligence predicts atheism rates across 137 nations. Intelligence, 37, 11–15. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Norenzayan, A., Shariff, A. F. (2008). The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science, 322, 58. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Omoto, A. M., Malsch, A. M., Barraza, J. A. (2009). Compassionate acts: Motivations for and correlates of volunteerism among older adults. In Fehr, B., Sprecher, S., Underwood, L. G. (Eds.), The science of compassionate love: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 257–282). Malden, MA: Wiley Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
|
Penner, L. A., Dovidio, J. F., Piliavin, J. A., Schroeder, D. A. (2005). Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 365–392. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Piff, P. K., Kraus, M. W., Cote, S., Cheng, B. H., Keltner, D. (2010). Having less, giving more: The influence of social class on prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 771. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Shariff, A. F., Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18, 803–809. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Simpson, B., Willer, R. (2008). Altruism and indirect reciprocity: The interaction of person and situation in prosocial behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 71, 37. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Simpson, B. T. (2003). Sex, fear, and greed: A social dilemma analysis of gender and cooperation. Social Forces, 82, 35–52. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Smith, T. W. (2009). Loving and caring in the United States: Trends and correlates of empathy, altruism, and related constructs. In Fehr, B., Sprecher, S., Underwood, L. G. (Eds.), The science of compassionate love: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 81–120). Walden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Google Scholar | |
|
Snibbe, A. C., Markus, H. R. (2005). You can’t always get what you want: Educational attainment, agency, and choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 703. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Stark, R. (1999). Secularization, R.I.P. Sociology of Religion, 60, 249–273. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Zuckerman, P. (2007). Atheism: Contemporary rates and patterns. In Martin, M. (Ed.), Cambridge companion to atheism (pp. 47–68): New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar |
