Beliefs shape how people interpret information and may impair how people engage in logical reasoning. In three studies, we show how ideological beliefs impair people’s ability to (1) recognize logical validity in arguments that oppose their political beliefs and (2) recognize the lack of logical validity in arguments that support their political beliefs. We observed belief bias effects among liberals and conservatives who evaluated the logical soundness of classically structured logical syllogisms supporting liberal or conservative beliefs. Both liberals and conservatives frequently evaluated the logical structure of entire arguments based on the believability of arguments’ conclusions, leading to predictable patterns of logical errors. As a result, liberals were better at identifying flawed arguments supporting conservative beliefs and conservatives were better at identifying flawed arguments supporting liberal beliefs. These findings illuminate one key mechanism for how political beliefs distort people’s abilities to reason about political topics soundly.

Cohen, G. L. (2003). Party over policy: The dominating impact of group influence on political beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 808.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Ditto, P. H., Liu, B., Clark, C. J., Wojcik, S. P., Grady, R., Chen, E. E.…Zinger, J . (2018). At least bias is bipartisan: A meta-analytic comparison of partisan bias in liberals and conservatives. Perspectives in Psychological Science. doi: 10.1177/1745691617746796.
Google Scholar | Medline
Evans, J. S. B., Barston, J. L., Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11, 295306.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Feather, N. T. (1964). Acceptance and rejection of arguments in relation to attitude strength, critical ability, and intolerance of inconsistency. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69, 127.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Gervais, W. M., Shariff, A. F., Norenzayan, A. (2011). Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 11891206.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Henle, M., Michael, M. (1956). The influence of attitudes on syllogistic reasoning. The Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 115127.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Janis, I. L., Frick, F. (1943). The relationship between attitudes toward conclusions and errors in judging logical validity of syllogisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33, 73.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Kahan, D. M., Hoffman, D. A., Braman, D., Evans, D. (2012). They saw a protest: Cognitive illiberalism and the speech-conduct distinction. Stanford Law Review, 64, 851.
Google Scholar | ISI
Kahan, D. M., Peters, E., Dawson, E. C., Slovic, P. (2017). Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government. Behavioural Public Policy, 1, 5486.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Lord, C. G., Ross, L., Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Morgan, J. J., Morton, J. T. (1944). The distortion of syllogistic reasoning produced by personal convictions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 3959.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Newstead, S. E., Pollard, P., Evans, J. S. B. T., Allen, J. (1992). The source of belief bias effects in syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 45, 257284.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B., Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 653684.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Oakhill, J. V., Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1985). The effects of belief on the spontaneous production of syllogistic conclusions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 553569.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 369381.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Sells, S. B. (1936). The atmosphere effect: An experimental study of reasoning. Archives of Psychology (Columbia University), 200, 72.
Google Scholar
Smith, C. T., Ratliff, K. A., Nosek, B. A. (2012). Rapid assimilation: Automatically integrating new information with existing beliefs. Social Cognition, 30, 199219.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Thouless, R. H. (1959). Effect of prejudice on reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 50, 289293.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Access Options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here.

Your Access Options


Purchase

SPP-article-ppv for $36.00
Single Issue 24 hour E-access for $203.50