![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
This article describes the need and prospects for alternative assessment approaches in online learning environments within the context of higher education. Assessment in higher education has traditionally focused on retention of knowledge and its application in limited contexts as measured by paper and pencil tests and academic assignments such as writing term papers. Increased interest among academics in what has been labeled “alternative assessment” reflects both dissatisfaction with national approaches to assessment and the desire to assess the attainment of higher order educational goals that involve deep understanding and active use of knowledge in complex, realistic contexts. Concerns about current assessment approaches are increasing as online learning environments become more prevalent in higher education. The article prescribes three different approaches to integrating alternative assessment approaches into online learning environments: 1) cognitive assessment, 2) performance assessment, and 3) portfolio assessment.
References
| 1. | Schilling, K. M. and Schilling, K. L. , Proclaiming and Sustaining Excellence: Assessment as a Faculty Role, Association for the Study of Higher Education and ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education, Washington, D.C.,1998. Google Scholar |
| 2. | Lucas, C. J. , Crisis in the Academy: Rethinking Higher Education in America, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1996. Google Scholar |
| 3. | Morris, K. , Wiring the Ivory Tower, Business Week, pp. 90–92, August 9, 1999. Google Scholar |
| 4. | Katz, R. N. , Dancing with the Devil: Information Technology and the New Competition in Higher Education, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1999. Google Scholar |
| 5. | Jones, G. R. , Cyberschools: An Education Renaissance, Jones Digital Century, Englewood, Colorado, 1997. Google Scholar |
| 6. | Daniel, J. S. , Mega-Universities and Knowledge Media: Technology Strategies for Higher Education, Kogan Page, London, 1998. Google Scholar |
| 7. | Noble, D. F. , Digital Diploma Mills: The Automation of Higher Education. FirstMonday, 3: 1, 1998 (http://firstmonday.dk/issues/issue3_1/noble/index.html). Google Scholar |
| 8. | American Association of Higher Education , Nine Principles of Good Practice for Assessing Student Learning, AAHE, Washington, D.C. (http://www.aahe.org/). Google Scholar |
| 9. | Reeves, T. C. and Okey, J. , (1996). Alternative Assessment for Constructivist Learning Environments, in Constructivist Learning Environments, Wilson, B. (ed.), Educational Technology, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 191–202, 1996. Google Scholar |
| 10. | Wiggins, G. P. , Assessing Student Performance: Exploring the Purpose and Limits of Testing, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1993. Google Scholar |
| 11. | Magner, D. K. , The Graying Professorate, The Chronicle of Higher Education, XLVI: 2, pp. A18–A21, September 3, 1999. Google Scholar |
| 12. | Terenzini, P. T. , Assessment with Open Eyes: Pitfalls in Studying Student Outcomes, The Journal of Higher Education, 60: 6, pp. 644–664, 1989. Google Scholar | ISI |
| 13. | Diamond, R. M. , Designing and Assessing Courses and Curricula: A Practical Guide, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1993. Google Scholar |
| 14. | Angelo, T. A. and Cross, K. P. , Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers (2nd Edition.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1997. Google Scholar |
| 15. | Cambridge, B. L. , Introduction: Learning about Assessment, in Learning through Assessment: A Resource Guide for Higher Education, Gardiner, L., Anderson, C., and Cambridge, B. L. (eds.), American Association for Higher Education, Washington, D.C., 1997. Google Scholar |
| 16. | Dehoney, J. and Reeves, T. C. , Instructional and Social Dimensions of Class Web Pages, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 10: 2, pp. 19–41, 1999. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 17. | Senge, P. M. , The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of Learning Organization, Doubleday Books, New York, 1994. Google Scholar |
| 18. | Merluzzi, T. V., Glass, C. R., and Genest, M. (eds.), Cognitive Assessment, New York University Press, New York, 1986. Google Scholar |
| 19. | Novak, J. D. and Gowin, D. R. , Learning How To Learn, Cambridge Press, New York, 1984. Google Scholar | Crossref |
| 20. | Jonassen, D. H., Reeves, T. C., Hong, N., Harvey, D., and Peters, K. , Concept Mapping as Cognitive Learning and Assessment Tools, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 8: 3/4, pp. 289–308, 1997. Google Scholar |
| 21. | Haertel, E. , Performance Measurement, in Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Alkin, M. C. (ed.), Macmillan, New York, 1992. Google Scholar |
| 22. | Linn, R. L., Baker, E. L., and Dunbar, S. B. , Complex, Performance-Based Assessment: Expectations and Validation Criteria, Educational Researcher, 20: 8, pp. 15–21, 1991. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |
| 23. | Knight, M. E. , Portfolio Assessment: Application of Portfolio Analysis, University Press of America, Lanham, Maryland, 1994. Google Scholar |
| 24. | Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. (eds.), How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1999. Google Scholar |
| 25. | Duderstadt, J. J. , Can Colleges and Universities Survive in the Information Age, in Dancing with the Devil: Information Technology and the New Competition in Higher Education, Katz, R. N. (ed.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 1–25, 1999. Google Scholar |
| 26. | Khan, B. H. (ed.), Web-Based Instruction, Educational Technology, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1997. Google Scholar |
