While Engineering values direct communication, indirect communication produces a kind of literacy salient for engineers that direct communication may not offer in the way indirect communication does. This article emphasizes the inadequacies of overly emphasizing direct communication for Engineering majors and explains how teaching indirect communication in the form of literature has the potential to cover some of the inadequacies one can encounter if one were to overly emphasize direct communication.

Fox, C. (2002, Fall). Beyond the “tyranny of the real”: Revisiting Burke's Pentad as research method for professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 11(4), 365388.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Frye, N. (1964). The educated imagination. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Concluding unscientific postscript to philosophical fragments (Vol. 1). Hong, H. V. & Hong, E. H. (Trans.). New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Google Scholar
Kraemer, W. G. (2009). The hypnotic literary genre: Poetry, trance, and hypnotext. Ann Arbor, MI: Proquest (UMI Microfilm 3376839).
Google Scholar
Kynell, T. (1996). Writing in a milieu of utility: The move to technical communication in American engineering programs, 1850–1950. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Google Scholar
Murphy, J. J. (1990). Roman writing instruction as described by Quintilian. In Murphy, J. J. (Ed.), A short history of writing instruction from ancient Greece to twentieth-century America (pp. 1976). Davis: Hermagoras.
Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. , & Prosch, H. (1975). Meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Google Scholar
Quintillanus, M. F. (1933). The institutio oratoria of Quintilian. (Butler, H. E. , Trans.). London, UK: Heinemann.
Google Scholar
Joseph, Sister M. (2000). The trivium: The liberal arts of logic grammar, and rhetoric. Understanding the nature and function of language. Philadelphia, PA: Paul Dry.
Google Scholar
Taylor, J. L. (1998). Poetic knowledge: The recovery of education. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Google Scholar
Jeyaraj, Joseph . Native informants, ethos, and unsituated rhetoric: Some rhetorical issues in postcolonial discourses. Pretexts: Literary and Cultural Studies, 12(1), 2003.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Jeyaraj, Joseph . Liminality and othering: The issue of rhetorical authority in technical discourse in a special issue on theory in the Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20(10), 2004.
Google Scholar
Jeyaraj, Joseph . Grammar gurus and essayists in colonial India: A short study on writing practices. The Knowledge Society Journal, 2(2), 2006.
Google Scholar
Jeyaraj, Joseph . Technical communication and cross cultural miscommunication: User culture and the outsourcing of writing. In Grady, H. & Heyhoe, G. (Eds.), Connecting people with technology: Issues in professional communication (pp. 8697). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
Google Scholar
Jeyaraj, Joseph . Modernity and empire: A modest analysis of early colonial writing practices. College Composition and Communication, 60(2), 2009.
Google Scholar
Jeyaraj, Joseph . British Indian grammar, writing pedagogies, and writing for the professions: Classical pedagogy in British India. Technical Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 2010.
Google Scholar | Crossref
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JTW-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0