![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Researchers have noted a physical resemblance (homophily) between human sex partners. To date, these studies and their related interpretations have been based on heterosexual couples. The present study compared physical resemblances between gay, lesbian, and heterosexual couples, using 40 photographs of each from national newspapers, which were rated by 34 men and 56 women (M age = 53 yr., SD = 12.1). Half the photographs were of actual couples and half were randomly mixed within each group. Actual couples were rated as significantly more similar in appearance than random pairings of people. Ratings of similarity were significantly higher (indicating greater perceived homophily) for gay couples than heterosexual couples, while there was no statistically significant difference in similarity ratings between lesbian couples versus gay and heterosexual couples. The results were interpreted in terms of evolutionary and parental imprinting hypotheses.
References
| Alvarez, L. , & Jaffe, K. (2004) Narcissism guides mate selection: humans mate assortatively, as revealed by facial resemblance, following an algorithm of “self-seeking like.” Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 177–194. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
| Bailey, J. M., Kim, P. Y., Hills, A., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (1997) Butch, femme, or straight acting? Partner preferences of gay men and lesbians. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 960–973. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Bell, A. P., Weinberg, M. S., & Hammersmith, S. K. (1981) Sexual preference: its development in men and women. Bloomington, IN: Indiana Univer. Press. Google Scholar | |
| Bem, D. J. (1996) Exotic becomes erotic: a developmental theory of sexual orientation. Psychological Review, 103, 320–335. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Bereczkei, T., Gyrus, I., & Weisfeld, G. E. (2004) Sexual imprinting in human mate choice. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 271, 1129–1134. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Black, D. L. , & Lichter, D. T. (2004) Homogamy among dating, cohabiting, and married couples. Sociological Review, 45, 719–737. Google Scholar | |
| Daly, M. (1989) On distinguishing evolved adaptation from epiphenomena. Behavior Brain Science, 12, 520. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Hauber, M. E. , & Sherman, P. W. (2001) Self-referent phenotype matching: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence. Trends in Neuroscience, 24, 609–616. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
| Hill, C. T., Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. A. (1976) Breakups before marriage: the end of 103 affairs. Journal of Social Issues, 32, 147–168. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Hinsz, V. B. (1989) Facial resemblance in engaged and married couples. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6, 223–229. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
| Jaffe, K. (2002) On sex, mate selection, and evolution: an exploration. Comments on Theoretical Biology, 7, 91–107. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
| Kerckhoff, A. C , & Davis, K. E. (1962) Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection. American Sociological Review, 27, 295–303. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
| Wiszewska, A., Pawlowski, B., & Boothroyd, L. G. (2007) Father-daughter relationship as a moderator of sexual imprinting: a facialmetric study. Evolutionary and Human Behavior, 28, 248–252. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |
